throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: July 2, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, L.P.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TECHNICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00860
`Patent 7,552,640 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, BRYAN F. MOORE, and
`JASON J. CHUNG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00860
`Patent 7,552,640 B2
`
`
`
`I. BACKGROUND
`
`This Order is being entered to dispose of certain claims and grounds
`
`of challenge the parties have agreed to exclude from further consideration in
`
`this trial.
`
`The Petition (Paper 1) requested inter partes review of claim 1–20 of
`
`U.S. Patent No 7,552,640 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’640 patent”). In our
`
`Institution Decision (Paper 14), we determined that Petitioner had
`
`demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it would establish that at least one
`
`of the challenged claims of the ’640 patent is unpatentable. Paper 14, 2. We
`
`therefore instituted inter partes review of certain challenged claims. Id.
`
`On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court held that a final written
`
`decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) must decide the patentability of all claims
`
`challenged in the petition. SAS Inst., Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348, 1355
`
`(2018). We modified our Institution Decision to institute trial on all of the
`
`challenged claims and all of the grounds presented in the Petition. See id.
`
`Specifically, we modified our Institution Decision to include the following
`
`additional grounds:
`
`Claim(s)
`
`Basis
`
`References
`
`3, 12
`
`§ 102(b) Lam
`
`5, 7,14, 16
`
`§ 103(a) Lam and Assanelli
`
`3, 5, 7, 12, 14,
`16
`
`
`
`§ 103(a) Assanelli and Lam
`
`Paper 36. An Oral Hearing in this case was held on May 17, 2018. The
`
`Hearing Transcript (“Tr.”) is included in the record as Paper 38. At the
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00860
`Patent 7,552,640 B2
`
`
`hearing, the Board and the parties reached agreement on the disposition of
`
`certain claims and grounds.
`
`
`
`
`
`II. CLAIMS 3 AND 12
`
`In its Response to the Petition (Paper 18), Patent Owner stated:
`
`“Patent Owner advises the Board that it will now disclaim Claims 3 and 12
`
`of the ‘640 patent.” Paper 18, 11. At the oral argument this statement was
`
`discussed with the parties. See Tr. 1:3–5:2; 6:4–8; 60:6–10. Patent Owner
`
`confirmed its intention to disclaim claims 3 and 12. Id. at 6:6–8. After
`
`initially requesting that the Patent Owner file a request for adverse judgment
`
`on those claims, the Board later concluded that Patent Owner’s
`
`representations at the hearing and in its Response were sufficient: “We will
`
`enter an order on that issue. You have made the representation on the record.
`
`I think that will be sufficient.” Tr. 60:8–10.
`
`
`
`
`
`III. ADDITIONAL GROUNDS
`
`At the oral hearing, the parties agreed to limit the case to the grounds
`
`on which the Board initially instituted the proceeding. Tr. 5:3–6:2. After
`
`the agreement was reached, the Board stated it would follow up with an
`
`order. Id. at 6:1–4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IV. ORDER
`
`In view of the foregoing, it is:
`
`ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 42.73 (b), adverse judgment
`
`is entered as to claims 3 and 12 of the ’640 patent;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, trial is
`
`terminated as to all grounds not included in the trial in the Institution
`
`Decision;
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00860
`Patent 7,552,640 B2
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that only the following grounds remain in the
`
`trial:
`
`Claim(s)
`
`Basis
`
`References
`
`9, 11, 18, 20
`5, 7, 9, 11, 14,
`16, 18, 20
`9,11,18, 20
`
`§ 102(b) Assanelli
`
`§ 103(a) Kiefer and Assanelli
`
`§ 103(a) Lam and Assanelli
`
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Robert M. Bowick, Jr.
`Bradford T. Laney
`RALEY & OWICK, L.L.P.
`rbowick@raleybowick.com
`blaney@raleybowick.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Ted M. Anthony
`BABINEAUX, POCHÉ, ANTHONY & SLAVICH, L.L.C.
`tanthony@bpasfirm.com
`
`Joseph L. Lemoine, Jr.
`LEMOINE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
`joe@lemoine.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket