throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 48
`Entered: June 6, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00861 (Patent 7,627,708 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00864 (Patent 7,523,243 B2)1
`
`____________
`
`Before BRIAN J. McNAMARA, DANIEL N. FISHMAN, and
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FISHMAN, Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are the same in both identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00861 (Patent 7,627,708 B2)
`IPR2017-00864 (Patent 7,523,243 B2)
`
`
`Both parties requested oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a).
`Papers 33, 34.2 The requests are granted and each party will be allotted
`sixty (60) minutes for argument.
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM ET, on Thursday,
`June 14, 2018, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany
`Street, Alexandria, Virginia. The hearing will be open to the public for in-
`person attendance that will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served
`basis. The Board will provide a court reporter, and the reporter’s transcript
`will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s
`patent claims at issue are unpatentable. Petitioner will proceed first to
`present its case with respect to the challenged patent claims and grounds
`with respect to which the Board instituted. Petitioner may reserve some of
`its argument time to respond to Patent Owner’s presentation. Thereafter,
`Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s arguments. Lastly, Petitioner may
`make use of the time it has reserved, if any, to rebut Patent Owner’s
`opposing presentation regarding patentability.
`Demonstrative exhibits must be served on the opposing party at least
`five (5) business days before the hearing date. 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). The
`parties also shall provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to
`the Board at least five (5) business days prior to the hearing by emailing
`them to Trials@uspto.gov. Despite the requirement in § 42.70(b) to file
`demonstratives, the parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`this proceeding without prior authorization from the Board.
`
`
`2 Citations are to IPR2017-00861 unless otherwise noted.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00861 (Patent 7,627,708 B2)
`IPR2017-00864 (Patent 7,523,243 B2)
`
`
`The parties should note that at least one member of the panel will be
`attending the hearing electronically from a remote location. The parties are
`reminded that each presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`document, exhibit, or demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript and for the benefit of judges participating electronically
`from remote locations.
`The parties must file any objections to the demonstrative exhibits with
`the Board at least three (3) business days before the hearing. Any objection
`to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference call to address them, if deemed necessary. Otherwise,
`the Board will reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument.
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The
`Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB
`January 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content
`of demonstrative exhibits.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made five (5)
`business days in advance of the hearing date. The request is to be sent to
`Trials@uspto.gov or should be directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. If
`the request is not received timely, the equipment may not be available on the
`day of the hearing.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00861 (Patent 7,627,708 B2)
`IPR2017-00864 (Patent 7,523,243 B2)
`
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the
`hearing, although lead or back-up counsel of record may make the
`presentation. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not attend
`the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`with the Board no later than two (2) business days prior to the oral hearing to
`discuss the matter.
`The parties are reminded that, at the oral argument, they “may rely
`upon evidence that has been previously submitted in the proceeding and
`may only present arguments relied upon in the papers previously submitted.”
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768
`(Aug. 14, 2012). “No new evidence or arguments may be presented at the
`oral argument.” Id.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that oral argument will commence at 1:00 PM ET,
`on Thursday, June 14, 2018, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East,
`600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`PETITIONER:
`Scott A. McKeown
`James L. Davis, Jr.
` ROPES & GRAY LLP
`Scott.McKeown@ropesgray.com
` james.l.davis@ropesgray.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Bruce W. Slayden II
`R. Beard
`SLAYDEN GRUBERT BEARD PLLC
`bslayden@sgbfirm.com
`wbeard@sgbfirm.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket