`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 29
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00912
`U.S. Patent No. 8,745,149 B2
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`PATENT OWNER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`Patent Owner BlackBerry Ltd.
`Google LLC v. BlackBerry Ltd.
`IPR2017-00911, -00912
`U.S. Patent No. 8,745,149
`
`May 30, 2018
`
`1
`
`
`
`Overview of 149 IPRs
`
`IPR2017-00911
`Appelman and Toshio
`Claims 1-5, 9-13, and 17
`Claims 1, 5-7, 9, 13-15, and 17 Appelman and Milton
`Claims 8 and 16
`Appelman, Toshio, and MacPhail
`Claims 8 and 16
`Appelman, Milton, and MacPhail
`
`IPR2017-00912
`Claims 1, 5, 7, 9, 13, 15, and 17 Graham, with or without Deshpande
`Claims 1, 5-7, 9, 13-15, and 17 Graham and Milton, with or without Deshpande
`Claims 1-5, 9-13, and 17
`Graham and Toshio, with or without Deshpande
`Claims 8 and 16
`Graham and MacPhail, with or without Deshpande
`Claims 8 and 16
`Graham, Toshio, and MacPhail, with or without
`Deshpande
`Graham, Milton, and MacPhail, with or without
`Deshpande
`
`Claims 8 and 16
`
`2
`
`
`
`Overview of 149 Issues
`
`• “Automatically Changing … and Displaying”
`
`- Construction
`
`- Toshio, Milton, and Graham’s Manually-Initiated Functionality
`
`- Google’s “Backup” Argument
`
`• Milton is Non-Analogous Art
`
`• Nonobviousness of Appelman Combinations
`
`• Graham’s Use of Email for Mixed-Media
`Embodiment
`
`3
`
`
`
`Construction of
`“Automatically Changing … and Displaying”
`
`4
`
`
`
`“Automatically Changing … and Displaying”
`
`’149 Patent
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1001 (149 Patent), Figs. 9-10; 911 POR at 3-4
`
`5
`
`
`
`“Automatically Changing … and Displaying”
`
`’149 Patent
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1001 (149 Patent), 7:37-8:5; 911 POR at 4-5
`
`6
`
`
`
`Prosecution History
`
`Lapuyade
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2002 (Lapuyade), Fig. 7; 911 POR at 7
`
`7
`
`
`
`Prosecution History
`
`File History
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1004 (149 FH), 233, 236; 911 POR at 7-8
`
`8
`
`
`
`Institution Decisions
`
`911 Institution Dec.
`
`d
`
`911 Dec. 8, 15
`
`9
`
`
`
`“Automatically Changing … and Displaying”
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 39:7-40:3; 911 POR at 19
`
`10
`
`
`
`“Automatically Changing … and Displaying”
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 41:7-42:16; 911 POR at 19
`
`11
`
`
`
`Toshio Discloses a
`Manually-Initiated Display Operation
`
`12
`
`
`
`Toshio’s Display Functionality
`
`911 Petition
`
`d
`
`Toshio
`
`d
`
`911 Pet. 20-21; Ex. 1007, 230-31; 911 POR at 22
`
`13
`
`
`
`Toshio: “depending on the user’s need”
`
`Toshio
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1007, 230-31; 911 POR at 22-23
`
`14
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert on Toshio
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶58; 911 POR at 22
`
`15
`
`
`
`Toshio – Field of Invention + Means for Solving
`
`Toshio
`
`d
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1007, 229-30; Ex. 2006, 181:19-182:24; 911 POR at 23-24
`
`16
`
`
`
`Dr. Olsen on “Selective Call Receiver”
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 171:17-172:8, 188:6-10; 911 POR 25-26
`
`17
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Arguments
`
`911 Reply
`
`d
`
`911 Reply at 14
`
`18
`
`
`
`Milton Discloses a
`Manually-Initiated Display Operation
`
`19
`
`
`
`Milton’s Report Functionality
`
`Milton
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1006, 3:48-63, Fig. 4; 911 POR at 28-30
`
`20
`
`
`
`Milton’s Report Functionality
`
`911 Petition
`
`d
`
`911 Pet. 42
`
`21
`
`
`
`Dr. Olsen on Milton
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 160:11-161:11; 911 POR at 32
`
`22
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Arguments
`
`911 Reply
`
`d
`
`911 Reply at 17
`
`23
`
`
`
`Graham Discloses a
`Manually-Initiated Display Operation
`
`24
`
`
`
`Graham’s “Time Information”
`
`912 Petition
`
`d
`
`912 Pet. 17
`
`25
`
`
`
`Graham’s Elapsed Time
`
`Graham
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1005, 10:29-37, Fig. 5; 912 POR at 33
`
`26
`
`
`
`Graham’s Illuminable Input Key
`
`Graham
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1005, 13:1-12, 8:27-39; 912 POR at 37
`
`27
`
`
`
`Graham’s Abstract
`
`Graham
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1005, Abstract; 912 POR at 34-35
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dr. Olsen on Graham
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex 2006, 244:12-245:9; 912 POR at 35
`
`29
`
`
`
`Graham’s Elapsed Time
`
`Graham
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1005, 11:14-19; 912 POR at 36
`
`30
`
`
`
`Related European Prosecution
`
`PO Sur-Reply
`
`d
`
`912 Paper 27 at 1
`
`31
`
`
`
`Google’s Backup Argument for
`“Automatically Changing and Displaying”
`
`32
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Backup Argument
`
`911 Petition
`
`d
`
`911 Pet. 24-25; see also 911 Pet. 44-45; 912 Pet. 25-26
`
`33
`
`
`
`Dr. Olsen – No Backup Theory
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 197:6-200:19, 207:5-11, 211:19-24; 911 POR at 34
`
`34
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Backup Argument
`
`911 Petition
`
`d
`
`“[T]he Board cannot accept general conclusions
`about what is ‘basic knowledge’ or ‘common sense’
`as a replacement for documentary evidence for core
`factual findings in a determination of patentability.”
`
`K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Wear Techs., LLC, 751 F.3d
`1362, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`911 Pet. 25 n.11; 911 POR at 36
`
`35
`
`
`
`Milton is Non-Analogous Art
`
`36
`
`
`
`Non-Analogous Art
`
`“Two separate tests define the scope of analogous
`prior art:
`(1) whether the art is from the same field of
`endeavor, regardless of the problem addressed and,
`(2) if the reference is not within the field of the
`inventor's endeavor, whether the reference still is
`reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with
`which the inventor is involved.”
`
`In re Bigio, 381 F.3d 1320, 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2004)
`
`911 POR at 47
`
`37
`
`
`
`’149 Patent’s Field of Endeavor: Handheld Messaging UI
`
`’149 Patent
`
`d
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1001, 1:19-24: Ex. 2006, 29:18-23; 911 POR at 48
`
`38
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert on Milton
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`dd
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶¶75-76; 911 POR at 48
`
`39
`
`
`
`Milton’s Field of Endeavor: Voicemail
`
`Milton
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1006, 1:6-26; 911 POR at 48
`
`40
`
`
`
`’149 Patent’s Field of Endeavor
`
`911 Petition
`
`d
`
`911 Pet. 5, 41
`
`41
`
`
`
`Problem: Displaying Time Data on Small Displays
`
`’149 Patent
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1001, 1:65-2:5, 8:6-36; 911 POR at 50-51
`
`42
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert on Milton
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`dd
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶¶77-78; 911 POR at 50-51
`
`43
`
`
`
`Nonobviousness of Appelman and Toshio
`
`44
`
`
`
`Appelman: Dynamic, Urgent, Interactive Messaging
`
`Appelman
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1012, 2:12-24, 3:9-12; 911 POR at 40
`
`45
`
`
`
`Appelman : Dynamic, Urgent, Interactive Messaging
`
`Appelman
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1012, 10:12-22, 8:21-26; 911 POR at 40-41
`
`46
`
`
`
`Toshio: a Selective Call Receiver
`
`Toshio
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1007, 230-31; 911 POR at 42
`
`47
`
`
`
`Nonobviousness of Appelman and Toshio
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`dd
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶65; 911 POR at 40-43
`
`48
`
`
`
`Nonobviousness of Appelman and Toshio
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`dd
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶66; 911 POR at 45
`
`49
`
`
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Obviousness Opinions
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 194:9-195:22, 276:7-19; 911 POR at 47 n.5
`
`50
`
`
`
`Nonobviousness of Appelman and Milton
`
`51
`
`
`
`Nonobviousness of Appelman and Milton
`
`Appelman
`
`d
`
`Milton
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1006, 1:6-61; Ex. 1012, 2:12-24; 911 POR at 40
`
`52
`
`
`
`Nonobviousness of Appelman and Milton
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`dd
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶83; 911 POR at 53
`
`53
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Arguments
`
`911 Reply
`
`d
`
`911 Petition
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2007, ¶83; 911 POR at 53
`
`54
`
`
`
`Graham’s Mixed-Media Embodiment
`Uses Email, Not Instant Messaging
`
`55
`
`
`
`Graham’s “Instant Messaging,” i.e., SMS
`
`912 Petition
`
`d
`
`912 Pet. 14-15
`
`56
`
`
`
`Graham’s “Instant Messaging,” i.e., SMS
`
`Graham
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1005, 11:20-21, 7:4-8, 10:65-11:1; 912 POR at 21
`
`57
`
`
`
`Graham’s Mixed-Media Messaging, i.e., e-mail
`
`Graham
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1005, 14:15-24, Figs. 13a-d; 912 POR at 22
`
`58
`
`
`
`Dr. Olsen on Figures 13a-d
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 2006, 281:2-17; 912 POR at 22
`
`59
`
`
`
`Email is not “Instant Messaging”
`
`’149 Patent
`
`d
`
`Dr. Olsen’s Dep.
`
`d
`
`Ex. 1001, 1:40-44; Ex. 2006, 142:19-25; 912 POR at 25
`
`60
`
`
`
`Deshpande Grounds
`
`912 Petition
`
`d
`
`912 Pet. 60
`
`61
`
`
`
`Deshpande Grounds
`
`912 Petition
`
`d
`
`912 Pet. 61-62
`
`62
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert on Deshpande
`
`Dr. Ligler
`
`dd
`
`912 Ex. 2007, ¶72; 912 POR at 31
`
`63
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Arguments
`
`912 Reply
`
`d
`
`912 Reply at 14-15
`
`64
`
`
`
`6565
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), this is to certify that on May 22, 2018, I
`
`caused to be served a true and correct copy of the foregoing and any accompanying
`
`exhibits by electronic mail on the following counsel:
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph E. Palys
`Phillip W. Citroën
`John S. Holley
`PH-Google-Blackberry-IPR@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`/Ching-Lee Fukuda/
`Ching-Lee Fukuda
`Reg. No. 44,334
`Sidley Austin LLP
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019
`P: (212) 839-7364
`F: (212)839-5599
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
