`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., AMAZON
`FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC., HULU, LLC, and NETFLIX, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE: IPR2017-00948
`Patent No. 8,566,960
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before DAVID C. MCKONE, BARBARA A. PARVIS, and MICHELLE N.
`WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`LEGAL139288117.1
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`U.S. Patent No. 8,566,960
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order dated August 14, 2017 (Paper 11),
`
`Petitioners Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Fulfillment
`
`Services, Inc., Hulu, LLC and Netflix, Inc. (“Petitioners”) respectfully requests
`
`oral argument, currently scheduled for May 8, 2018.
`
`5
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Petitioners request the oral argument to dis-
`
`cuss the issues raised in the parties’ filings in the on-going review, including but
`
`not limited to, the following items:
`
`• whether claims 1-25 of U.S. Patent No. 8,566,960 are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103;
`
`10
`
`• whether the amended claims in Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion
`
`•
`
`•
`
`to Amend are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 103, and 112;
`
`the issues raised in the Petition, including all exhibits thereto;
`
`the issues raised in Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Re-
`
`sponse, Contingent Motion to Amend, and Reply in Support of the
`
`15
`
`Motion to Amend, including all exhibits thereto;
`
`•
`
`the issues raised in Petitioner’s Reply and Opposition to the Con-
`
`tingent Motion to Amend, including all exhibits thereto;
`
`• rebuttal to the Patent Owner’s presentation on all issues; and
`
`• any other issues related to invalidity that the Board deems neces-
`
`20
`
`sary for issuing a final written decision.
`
`LEGAL139288117.1
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`U.S. Patent No. 8,566,960
`
`Petitioners request permission to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstratives and exhibits.
`
`Petitioners ask the Board to decide the length of time for the requested oral
`
`argument for each party. Petitioners suggest that 45 minutes per side should be ad-
`
`5
`
`equate to cover the arguments in this case. Petitioners currently plan to bring two
`
`individuals to the hearing.
`
`This request is timely filed by Due Date 4 pursuant to the Scheduling Order
`
`dated August 14, 2017 (Paper 11).
`
`
`
`Dated: April 4, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`3150 Porter Dr.,
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`(650)838-4300
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Daniel T. Shvodian /
`
`Lead Counsel
`Daniel T. Shvodian, Reg. No. 42,148
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Sarah E. Stahnke, Reg. No. 54,854
`
`Attorneys for AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.,
`AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES,
`INC., HULU, LLC, and NETFLIX, INC.
`
`
`LEGAL139288117.1
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`U.S. Patent No. 8,566,960
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing PETI-
`
`TIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT has been served in its entirety
`
`this 4th of April, 2018, via email and the PTAB E2E System to Patent Owner’s
`
`counsel of record at the following:
`
`Brett A. Mangrum (brett@etheridgelaw.com)
`Jeff Huang (jeff@etheridgelaw.com)
`
`Etheridge Law Group, PLLC
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120/324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Daniel T. Shvodian /
`Lead Counsel
`Daniel T. Shvodian, Reg. No. 42,148
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Sarah E. Stahnke, Reg. 54,854
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for AMAZON.COM, INC., AM-
`AZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., AMA-
`ZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC.,
`HULU, LLC, and NETFLIX, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LEGAL139288117.1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
