`____________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`BOYDSTUN EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COTTRELL, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00962
`U.S. Patent No. 7,585,140
`____________________
`
`PATENT OWNER COTTRELL, INC.’S
`MOTION FOR KYLE M. AMBORN TO
`APPEAR PRO HAC VICE UNDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Cottrell, Inc. (“Cottrell”) hereby moves the Board to admit
`
`IPR2017-00962
`Patent No. 7,585,140
`
`Kyle M. Amborn, pro hac vice, in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`Petitioner has confirmed that it does not oppose this Motion.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may admit counsel pro hac vice for
`
`good cause, so long as lead counsel is a registered practitioner and subject to any
`
`other conditions the Board requires. This motion satisfies the requirements of
`
`Section 42.10(c), because:
`
`1.
`
`Lead counsel, Ryan J. McBrayer, is a registered practitioner.
`
`2. Mr. Amborn is an experienced patent litigator with an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue here, as shown in his Declaration. See
`
`Cottrell Exhibit 2001.
`
`3.
`
`In particular, Mr. Amborn has been an attorney specializing in patent
`
`litigation for over nine years. Amborn Decl. ¶¶ 2, 4. He is a member in good
`
`standing of the Bar of the State of Washington, as well as the District of
`
`Columbia, and is admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
`
`Circuit. Id. at ¶ 5. Mr. Amborn also has a technical background, having earned a
`
`computer science degree from Washington University in St. Louis. Id. at ¶ 3.
`
`3. Mr. Amborn is also familiar with the subject matter of this case,
`
`having reviewed U.S. Patent No. 7,585,140, its prosecution history and the prior
`
`art of record. Id. at ¶ 10. Mr. Amborn has also reviewed the IPR Petition, the
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subsequent filings, and the declaration offered in support of Boydstun’s petition.
`
`IPR2017-00962
`Patent No. 7,585,140
`
`Id. He is therefore familiar with the underlying technology and the prior art at
`
`issue in this matter. Id. at ¶ 10.
`
`4.
`
`The remaining information required by the “Order, Authorizing
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, 37 C.F.R. §42.10” in Case IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7, is set forth in Mr. Amborn’s Declaration. See Amborn Decl. ¶¶ 1–10.
`
`The undersigned attorney welcomes a telephone call should the Office have
`
`any requests or questions.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 26, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` /s/ Ryan J. McBrayer
`Ryan J. McBrayer, Reg. No. 54,299
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-359-3073
`Fax: 206-359-4073
`Email: RMcBrayer@perkinscoie.com
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner Cottrell, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 26, 2017, copies of the
`
`IPR2017-00962
`Patent No. 7,585,140
`
`foregoing document was served on Petitioner at the following email addresses:
`
`
`
`Stephen Joncus
`Joncus Law LLC
`P.O. Box 838
`Clackamas, OR 97015
`Phone: 971.236.1200
`Email: steve@joncus.net
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David Madden
`Mersenne Law
`9600 SW Oak Street, Ste. 500
`Tigard, OR 97223
`Phone: 503.679.1671
`Email: dhm@mersenne.com
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Ryan J. McBrayer
`Ryan J. McBrayer, Reg. No. 54,299
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-359-3073
`Fax: 206-359-4073
`Email: RMcBrayer@perkinscoie.com
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
