throbber
Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
` ---oOo---
`
`WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE
`TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
`(d/b/a WABTEC CORPORATION)
` Plaintiff,
` C.A. No.
`v. 17-1687 (LPS) (CJB)
`SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.,
` Defendant.
`___________________________/
`
`VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JOHN D. LOUD, MSEE, PE, CFEI
` SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
` FRIDAY, JUNE 1, 2018
`
`BY: ANDREA M. IGNACIO, CSR, RPR, CRR, CCRR,
` CLR ~ CSR LICENSE NO. 9830
` JOB NO. 142615
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`9
`10
`
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`WABTEC CORP. EXHIBIT 1036
`Wabtec Corp. v. Siemens Industry, Inc.
`IPR2017-00981
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
` ---oOo---
`
`WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE
`TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
`(d/b/a WABTEC CORPORATION)
` Plaintiff,
` C.A. No.
`v. 17-1687 (LPS) (CJB)
`SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.,
` Defendant.
`___________________________/
`
` Videotaped Deposition of John D. Loud, MSEE,
` PE, CFEI taken on behalf of Plaintiffs, on June 1,
` 2018, at K&L Gates, Four Embarcadero Center,
` San Francisco, California, beginning 9:06 a.m., and
` commencing at 2:57 p.m., Pursuant to Notice, and
` before me, ANDREA M. IGNACIO, CSR, RPR, CRR, CLR ~
` License No. 9830.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`9
`10
`
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` FOR THE PETITIONER:
` K&L GATES
` By: BENJAMIN WEED, Esq.
` JASON ENGEL, Esq.
` 70 West Madison Street
` Chicago, Illinois 60602
`
` FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
` CROWELL & MORING
` By: MARK SUPKO, Esq.
` 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
` Washington, DC 20004
`
` ALSO PRESENT: Dave Swafford, Videographer
` ---oOo---
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

` SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
` FRIDAY, JUNE 1, 2018
` 9:06 a.m.
`
`Page 4
`
` (Documents marked Exhibit 433 - 436
` for identification.)
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the start of video
`labeled No. 1 in the deposition of John Loud. In the
`matter: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies
`Corporation, et al., versus Siemens Industry
`Incorporated.
` In the United States District Court, for the
`District of Delaware. Case No. 17-1687-LPS-CJB.
` This deposition is being held at
`Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2- -- 1200,
`San Francisco, California, on June 1st, 2018, at
`approximately 9:06 a.m.
` My name is Dave Swafford, from TSG Reporting
`Incorporated, and I'm a legal video specialist.
` Our court reporter today is Andrea M.
`Ignacio, in association with TSG Reporting.
` Will counsel please introduce yourself.
` MR. WEED: Ben Weed from K&L Gates on behalf
`of the plaintiffs, and with me is Jason Engel from K&L
`Gates.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`Page 5
` MR. SUPKO: Mark Supko from Crowell & Moring,
`representing Siemens Industry, Inc., and Mr. Loud.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`please swear in our witness.
`
` JOHN D. LOUD, MSEE, PE, CFEI,
` having been sworn as a witness,
` by the Certified Shorthand Reporter,
` testified as follows:
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: You may now proceed.
`
` EXAMINATION
` BY MR. WEED:
` Q Good morning, Mr. Loud.
` A Good morning.
` Q Would you please state and spell your name
`for this record.
` A John David Loud. Spelled J-O-H-N, and last
`name is L-O-U-D.
` Q Okay. I've put in front of you a handful of
`exhibits already. If you would pull out the one
`numbered 433, please.
` A I got it.
` Q And feel free to look through it as much as
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`Page 42
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q No. Sure. There's no reason to ask
`questions about it either.
` A It's your deposition. Whatever works.
` Q When we -- when we talked the last time, you
`mentioned some -- I asked you a question about whether
`you could recall any trial testimony you had given in
`a patent matter.
` A Yes.
` Q And I think the one that you can recall at
`that time involved a personal watercraft --
` A Oh, yes.
` Q -- controller?
` A Yamaha versus Bombardier, yes. I remember
`that.
` Q And that was trial testimony; correct?
` A So, I don't know. It was --
` Q It was in court testimony; is that right?
` A In court, yes. It was in the Trade
`Commission --
` Q Okay.
` A -- before a judge, so I assume that's --
` Q Sure.
` A Yeah.
` Q For purposes, it was not a deposition?
` A No, but -- but there is no jury.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`Page 43
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q Right.
` A So I don't know.
` Q Right.
` A I think that fits your description.
` Q Yeah.
` And so, I guess my question is: What --
`what, in your technical training, prepared you to
`testify about personal watercraft controllers in that
`case?
` A Oh, this is quite a few years ago.
` So, my background is electrical engineering
`and railroad and control systems, so I've done a lot
`of work in control systems, and repairing them from
`the perspective of locomotives, and designing and
`building motor controllers for the -- my master's
`thesis, and I've done a lot of work in different
`controller applications. Failure investigations with
`controllers.
` So I am qualified to offer opinions on
`control systems and controllers. And so, while I
`wouldn't say I had extensive experience in personal
`watercraft, per se, it was only the control aspects
`and the electronics that I was offering opinions
`about, and in that I was qualified
` Q Okay. And do you recall having any trouble
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`Page 44
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`understanding the technology involved in that case?
` A No, no. I understood it very well.
` Q Okay. And I -- this is going to test your
`memory, but do you have any recollection of the
`vintage of the patent that was at issue in that case,
`in terms of filing date?
` A No.
` Q Okay. Do you remember how long ago the
`testimony occurred?
` A I'd have to go through my testimony records,
`but over ten years ago.
` Q Okay. Do you know if -- might it have been
`in the '90s? Or was it some time in the 2000s?
` A It seems that it was most likely in the
`2000s, but I wouldn't want to rule out the possibility
`that it was -- I mean, I started in '95. Unlikely it
`was in the '90s.
` Q Okay. And I may have asked you this before:
`Do you remember, in that case, whether you gave
`testimony about issues related to validity, or issues
`related to infringement, or both?
` A I -- I remember we had claim charts. And I
`remember we were -- I was specifically working on
`infringement and whether or not the Bombardier
`watercraft infringed Yamaha's patents. I remember
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket