throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 9
`Entered: September 20, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COSMO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01034
`Patent 8,784,888 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, ZHENYU YANG, and
`KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SAWERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate
`Due to Settlement Prior to Institution
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01034
`Patent 8,784,888 B2
`
`
`
`On September 20, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate
`the instant proceeding (Paper 7), accompanied by a true copy of a settlement
`agreement (Ex. 2001), and a joint request to treat the agreement as business
`confidential information, to be kept separate from the patent file, pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 8).
`The parties indicate in their joint motion to terminate that they have
`reached an agreement resolving their current dispute involving U.S. Patent
`No. 8,784,888 B2 (“the ’888 patent”). Paper 7, 2. The parties request
`termination, stating that “[t]he settlement agreement was entered into in
`contemplation of termination of this proceeding.” Id. at 5. Additionally, the
`parties state that “[u]nder the terms of the settlement agreement, Patent
`Owner agrees to dismiss its infringement claim of [the ’888 patent] against
`Petitioner following termination of this IPR proceeding.” Id. at 2.
`This proceeding is in a preliminary stage. Patent Owner did not file a
`Preliminary Response, and no decision on whether to institute trial has been
`issued. Under the circumstances presented here, we determine that it is
`appropriate to terminate this preliminary proceeding with respect to both
`Petitioner and Patent Owner. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ joint
`motion to terminate. We also grant the parties’ joint request to treat their
`agreement as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the
`patent file.
`Accordingly, it is
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01034
`Patent 8,784,888 B2
`
`
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the proceedings is
`GRANTED;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request to treat the parties’
`agreement as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the
`patent file, is GRANTED; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the instant proceeding is TERMINATED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01034
`Patent 8,784,888 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jitendra Malik
`H. James Abe
`Lance Soderstrom
`Joseph Janusz
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`jitty.malik@alston.com
`james.abe@alston.com
`lance.soderstrom@alston.com
`joe.janusz@alston.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Gary Frischling
`Yite Lu
`Irell & Manella LLP
`gfrischling@irell.com
`yjlu@irell.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket