throbber

`
`Paper 22
`Entered: January 5, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LSI CORPORATION and
`AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01068
`Patent 5,859,601
`____________
`
`
`
`Before ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, and
`JACQUELINE T. HARLOW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01068
`Patent 5,859,601
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`On January 3, 2018, Judges Weinschenk, Boudreau, and Harlow held
`a telephone conference call with counsel for LSI Corp. and Avago
`Technologies U.S., Inc. (“Petitioners”) and counsel for Regents of the
`University of Minnesota (“Patent Owner”). A court reporter was present on
`the conference call. This Order summarizes statements made during the
`conference call. A more complete record may be found in the court
`reporter’s transcript, filed by Patent Owner as Exhibit 2003.
`II. ANALYSIS
`Patent Owner requested that we stay the instant proceeding pending
`appellate review of the Order Denying Patent Owner’s Motion to Dismiss
`(Paper 19) based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. Petitioners opposed
`Patent Owner’s request. After considering the respective positions of the
`parties, we hereby authorize Patent Owner to file a motion to stay, and we
`adopt a briefing schedule consistent with that outlined during the conference
`call. Specifically, we authorize Patent Owner to file a 10-page motion to
`stay by January 9, 2018; Petitioners to file a 10-page opposition to Patent
`Owner’s motion to stay by January 16, 2018; and Patent Owner to file a 3-
`page reply to Petitioners’ opposition by January 23, 2018.
`III. ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file a 10-page motion
`to stay by January 9, 2018;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners are authorized to file a 10-
`page opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to stay by January 16, 2018;
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01068
`Patent 5,859,601
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file a 3-
`page reply to Petitioners’ opposition by January 23, 2018; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Patent Owner to file a
`Preliminary Response in this proceedings is suspended pending our ruling
`on Patent Owner’s motion to stay.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01068
`Patent 5,859,601
`
`
`PETITIONERS:
`Kristopher Reed
`Edward Mayle
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
`tmayle@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Patrick McElhinny
`Mark Knedeisen
`K&L GATES LLP
`patrick.mcelhinny@klgates.com
`mark.knedeisen@klgates.com
`
`Richard Giunta
`Gerald Hrycyszyn
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`rgiunta-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`ghrycyszyn-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket