throbber
From: Gerald Hrycyszyn <Gerald.Hrycyszyn@WolfGreenfield.com>  
`Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 3:16 PM 
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com; LSI601IPR@kilpatricktownsend.com; TMayle@kilpatricktownsend.com; 
`dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com; Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com; Patrick.McElhinny@klgates.com; RGiunta‐
`PTAB@WolfGreenfield.com; GHrycyszyn‐PTAB@WolfGreenfield.com; Edward Gates 
`<Edward.Gates@WolfGreenfield.com>; Charles Steenburg <Charles.Steenburg@WolfGreenfield.com> 
`Subject: IPR2017‐01068 (LSI v. Regents of the university of Minnesota ) ‐ Request for Conference Call 
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Standard Operating Procedure 9 at 16-17 (discussing the handling of a case where a
`petition for certiorari is filed), the University of Minnesota (“UMN”) requests a conference call with the Board
`to request a “stay of proceedings on remand” pending final resolution by the Supreme Court of UMN’s
`forthcoming appeal on the applicability of sovereign immunity to IPR. Petitioner does not oppose.
`
`Continued Stay of the Proceedings
`UMN’s unopposed proposal is that the Board order a similar suspension to the one the Board recently ordered in
`four IPRs involving the Board of Regents, The University of Texas System (order attached). Specifically, UMN
`requests that the Board:
`
`(1) order this proceedings be suspended until the earlier of the expiration of a deadline to file, or the final
`disposition of, a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court for Regents of the
`University of Minnesota v. LSI Corp., Case No. 2018-1599; and
`
`(2) if the Supreme Court denies the petition for cert or ultimately rules against UMN on the merits, the
`deadline for UMN to file any Preliminary Response in this proceedings be set for two months from
`the denial of the petition for cert or the Supreme Court’s decision on the merits.
`
`Other IPRs Pending Against UMN
`Patent owner is requesting a similar suspension in ten other pending UMN IPRs. See IPR2017-01186, -01197, -
`01200, -01213, -01214, -01219, (Ericsson v. Regents of the University of Minnesota) (unopposed); IPR-2017-
`01712, -01753, -02004, -02005 (Gilead v. Regents of the University of Minnesota) (opposed).
`
`1
`
`

`

`Ericsson does not oppose a continued suspension of the six IPRs Ericsson filed against UMN. Gilead does oppose
`a continued suspension of the four IPRs Gilead filed against UMN.
`
`Availability For A Conference Call
`The parties to the LSI IPR are conferring on their availability next week. The parties will follow-up with the
`Board to provide available dates and times for a telephone conference.
`
`Respectfully submitted,


`
`Gerald B. Hrycyszyn | Shareholder
`Gerald.Hrycyszyn@WolfGreenfield.com
`617.646.8313 | fax 617.646.8646 
`Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, MA 02210
`405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174
`http://www.wolfgreenfield.com | 
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
`immediately by replying to this message. Please destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
`

`From: Hrycyszyn, Gerald B.  
`Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 2:52 PM 
`To: trials@uspto.gov 
`Cc: 'kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com' <kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com>; 'LSI601IPR@kilpatricktownsend.com' 
`<LSI601IPR@kilpatricktownsend.com>; 'TMayle@kilpatricktownsend.com' <TMayle@kilpatricktownsend.com>; 
`'dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com' <dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com>; 'Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com' 
`<Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com>; 'Patrick.McElhinny@klgates.com' <Patrick.McElhinny@klgates.com>; PTAB Rich 
`Giunta <RGiunta‐PTAB@WolfGreenfield.com>; PTAB Gerald Hrycyszyn <GHrycyszyn‐PTAB@WolfGreenfield.com>; 
`Gates, Edward <Edward.Gates@WolfGreenfield.com>; Steenburg, Charles <Charles.Steenburg@WolfGreenfield.com> 
`Subject: IPR2017‐01068 (LSI v. Regents of the university of Minnesota ) ‐ Apprising the Board of Developments in 
`Related Appellate Proceedings  

`Dear Board, 

`The Federal Circuit issued its mandate in Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. LSI Corporation case today.  UMN intends to 
`file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court.    

`There are eleven IPRs pending involving the University of Minnesota (UMN) that are currently all stayed, including the 
`one IPR referenced above.  UMN has reached out to the petitioners in all eleven cases to meet and confer about 
`whether petitioners agree with UMN that the stays of the IPRs should be maintained pending Supreme Court review of 
`the Federal Circuit’s decision, as was recently ordered in four IPRs involving the Board of Regents, The University of 
`Texas System (order attached). 

`Subject to other guidance from the Board, UMN will inform the Board of the results of the meet and confer after it has 
`taken place. 

`Respectfully submitted, 


`
`2
`
`

`

`Gerald B. Hrycyszyn | Shareholder
`Gerald.Hrycyszyn@WolfGreenfield.com
`617.646.8313 | fax 617.646.8646 
`Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, MA 02210
`405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174
`http://www.wolfgreenfield.com | 
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
`immediately by replying to this message. Please destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
`

`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket