throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________________________________
`
`WARGAMING GROUP LIMITED and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`GAME AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`––––––––––
`Case IPR2017-01082
`Patent 7,682,243
`
`___________________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO LIMIT BRIEFING AND EVIDENCE
`AS TO GROUND 2 OF THE PETITION
`
`

`

`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Petitioners Wargaming Group Limited and Activision Blizzard, Inc. and
`
`Patent Owner Game and Technology Co., Ltd. jointly request that the Board limit
`
`the briefing and evidence considered for Ground 2 of this proceeding to the
`
`briefing and evidence that was submitted prior to the Board’s institution of this
`
`inter partes review on October 6, 2017. Limiting the briefing and evidence as to
`
`Ground 2 will ensure the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of this
`
`proceeding because the deadline for Petitioners’ reply brief was imminent when
`
`Ground 2 was instituted by the Board in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in
`
`SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, and therefore briefing and discovery were largely
`
`complete at that time.
`
`The Board authorized the filing of this motion on the May 15, 2018
`
`conference call that was convened pursuant to the Board’s order dated May 3,
`
`2018 (Paper 47).
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`On March 13, 2017, Petitioner Wargaming filed a petition seeking inter
`
`partes review for claims 1-7 of the ’243 Patent. Paper 1. On October 6, 2017, the
`
`Board instituted inter partes review as to Ground 1 but not as to Ground 2. Paper
`
`14. Both Grounds 1 and 2 allege that claims 1–7 of the ’243 Patent are obvious,
`
`but each ground relies on a materially different combination of prior art. Ground 1
`
`1
`
`

`

`is based on the combination of the Dungeons and Dragons Player’s Handbook with
`
`the Levine Patent Application. Ground 2 is based on the combination of the
`
`Masters of Orion Strategy Guide with the Levine Patent Application.
`
`On May 3, 2018, the Board issued an order modifying the “institution
`
`decision to institute on all of the challenged claims and all of the grounds presented
`
`in the Petition” pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute, Inc. v.
`
`Iancu, 2018 WL 1914661, at *10 (U.S. Apr. 24, 2018). Paper 47. At the time of
`
`the Board’s order, Petitioner Wargaming was preparing its reply brief in support of
`
`the petition, and Petitioner Wargaming was not planning to submit a reply
`
`declaration by its expert.1 In the absence of the Board’s order, briefing and
`
`discovery in this briefing would have been substantially completed. The oral
`
`hearing is scheduled for July 11, 2018.
`
`III.
`
`JOINT AGREEMENT TO LIMIT BRIEFING AND EVIDENCE
`
`The parties jointly move to limit the briefing and evidence for Ground 2 to
`
`the briefing and evidence that was submitted prior to the Board’s October 6, 2017
`
`institution decision. Limiting the briefing and evidence for Ground 2 will allow
`
`the proceeding to continue according to the previously agreed schedule, which has
`
`the oral hearing set for July 11, 2018.
`
`1 On May 3, 2018, Petitioner Activision Blizzard, Inc. was added as a petitioner to
`
`this proceeding.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Given the late stage of the proceeding and considering the extensive briefing
`
`and discovery that has been completed, limiting the briefing and evidence for
`
`Ground 2 at this juncture promotes the efficient use of the Board’s resources and
`
`saves additional expense for the parties. While the parties understand that the
`
`Board’s final written decision may substantially incorporate its findings on Ground
`
`2 as set forth in the Board’s institution decision, the parties’ agreement to forego
`
`further briefing and evidence should not be considered a default or waiver of any
`
`rights, and the parties retain all rights to appeal any final written decision on all
`
`instituted grounds.
`
`May 22, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Harper Batts/
`Harper Batts, Reg. No. 56,160
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on May 22,
`
`2018, a complete and entire copy of the foregoing was filed electronically and
`
`served via email to all parties to this proceeding at the addresses indicated:
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Joseph J. Zito
`Richard Castellano
`DNL ZITO CASTELLANO
`jzito@dnlzito.com
`rcastellano@dnlzito.com
`
`William H. Mandir
`Peter S. Park
`John M. Bird
`Christopher Bezak
`Fadi Kiblawi
`SUGHRUE MION PLLC
`gat@sughrue.com
`jbird@sughrue.com
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`pspark@sughrue.com
`cbezak@sughrue.com
`fkiblawi@sughrue.com
`
`May 22, 2018
`
`FOR ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`Sharon Israel
`John D. Garretson
`Tanya Chaney
`SHOOK HARDY & BACON
`sisrael@shb.com
`jgarretson@shb.com
`tchaney@shb.com
`
`/Harper Batts/
`Harper Batts
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket