throbber

`
`Paper 54
`Entered: May 30, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`WARGAMING GROUP LIMITED and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GAME AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01082
`Patent 7,682,243 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before STACEY G. WHITE, DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Limit Briefing and Evidence
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.1(b), 42.71(a)
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01082
`Patent 7,682,243 B2
`
`
`
`The Institution Decision in this case instituted trial on one of the two
`grounds of unpatentability raised in the Petition. Paper 14. Subsequently,
`on April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court held that a decision to institute under
`35 U.S.C. § 314 may not institute on fewer than all claims challenged in the
`petition. SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348, 1359–60 (2018). By
`our Order of May 3, 2018, we modified our institution decision to institute
`on all of the grounds presented in the Petition. Paper 47.
`A conference call was held with the parties on May 16, 2018, to
`discuss the parties’ proposed approach to proceed with the case.
`Subsequently, via email, we authorized the parties to file a Joint Motion to
`Limit Briefing and Evidence as to Ground 2 of the Petition, which is the
`subject of this Order. Paper 52 (“Mot.”). Ground 2 is a ground of
`unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on the combination of the
`Master of Orion II Strategy Guide (Ex. 1009) and U.S. Patent Application
`Publication No. 2003/0177187 (Ex. 1004). Paper 1, 6–7.
`In their Joint Motion, “[t]he parties jointly move to limit the briefing
`and evidence for Ground 2 to the briefing and evidence that was submitted
`prior to the Board’s October 6, 2017 institution decision.” Mot. 2. The
`parties further state:
`Given the late stage of the proceeding and considering the
`extensive briefing and discovery that has been completed,
`limiting the briefing and evidence for Ground 2 at this juncture
`promotes the efficient use of the Board’s resources and saves
`additional expense for the parties. While the parties understand
`that the Board’s final written decision may substantially
`incorporate its findings on Ground 2 as set forth in the Board’s
`institution decision, the parties’ agreement to forego further
`briefing and evidence should not be considered a default or
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01082
`Patent 7,682,243 B2
`
`
`
`waiver of any rights, and the parties retain all rights to appeal any
`final written decision on all instituted grounds.
`Mot. 3.
`We agree with the parties that their proposed approach promotes
`efficiency, and, therefore, the approach furthers the Office’s policy of
`“secur[ing] the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every
`proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.1(b). Furthermore, by proposing this approach,
`we do not deem the parties to have conceded patentability or unpatentability
`based on Ground 2 or to have waived any arguments based on that ground of
`unpatentability.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that parties’ joint motion to limit the briefing and
`evidence for Ground 2 to the briefing and evidence that was submitted prior
`to the Board’s October 6, 2017 institution decision is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that we do not deem the parties to have
`conceded patentability or unpatentability based on Ground 2 or to have
`waived any arguments based on that ground of unpatentability.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01082
`Patent 7,682,243 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Harper Batts
`Jeffrey Liang
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`harper.batts@bakerbotts.com
`jeffrey.liang@bakerbotts.com
`
`Sharon A. Israel
`John D. Garretson
`Tanya Chaney
`SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
`sisrael@shb.com
`jgarretson@shb.com
`tchaney@shb.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph J. Zito
`Richard Castellano
`DNL ZITO CASTELLANO
`jzito@dnlzito.com
`rcastellano@dnlzito.com
`
`William H. Mandir
`Peter S. Park
`John M. Bird
`Christopher J. Bezak
`Fadi N. Kiblawi
`SUGHRUE MION PLLC
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`pspark@sughrue.com
`jbird@sughrue.com
`cbezak@sughrue.com
`fkiblawi@sughrue.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket