throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 36
`
`Entered: June 26, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`T-MOBILE US, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BARKAN WIRELESS ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2017-01099
`Patent 9,042,306 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, JOHN A. HUDALLA, and
`SHARON FENICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FENICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01099
`Patent 9,042,306 B2
`
`
`On April 24 2018, the Supreme Court held that, in a decision to institute an
`inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 314, the Board is not authorized to order a
`trial to proceed on fewer than all claims challenged in a petition. SAS Inst., Inc. v.
`Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018). On April 27, 2018, we modified our institution
`decision to institute on all of the challenged claims, inter alia, presented in the
`Petition (Paper 2). Paper 26.
`Petitioner previously requested (Paper 18) and received (Paper 20) a refund
`in the amount of $7,600.00 of the post-institution fee paid in connection with
`nineteen patent claims that were denied review in our institution decision. The
`introduction of newly instituted claims at this stage of the proceeding requires
`repayment of the refund. Accordingly, we require Petitioner to repay the post-
`institution fee that was refunded in the amount of $7,600.00. Paper 20.
`Repayment of the refunded post-institution fee in the amount of $7,600.00 is due
`within five (5) business days of the date of this Order. Given that our authority to
`institute review is limited to a “binary choice” between proceeding on all, or none,
`of the claims challenged in a petition (SAS at 1355), if repayment of the refunded
`post-institution fee is not timely made, the Board shall terminate this
`proceeding in its entirety.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner is required to repay the refunded post-institution
`fee in the amount of $7,600.00;
`FURTHER ORDERED that repayment of the refunded post-institution fee is
`due within five (5) business days of the date this Order;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, if repayment of the refunded post-institution
`fee is not timely made, this proceeding shall be terminated in its entirety.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01099
`Patent 9,042,306 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Chun M. Ng
`Miguel Bombach
`John Esterhay
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`cng@perkinscoie.com
`mbombach@perkinscoie.com
`jesterhay@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert D. Katz
`KATZ, PLLC
`rkatz@katzfirm.com
`
`Spencer C. Patterson
`spatterson@gchub.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket