throbber
=aaa
`
`Page 351 of 1365
`
`Page 351 of 1365
`
`
`

`

`CROSS REFERENCE(S)
`
`SUBCLASS (ONE SUBCLASS PER BLOCK) _
`
` 1-
`
`|]4 i
`
`| 15{$
`
`
`
`
`~[ISSUECLASSIFICATION]
`AY
`
`
`.eyJogaleteign seerences penn
`BkKenneth einciar
`Mefeee
`
`. Digital amplification
`ity
`5
`PTO-2040
`,
`,
`ba
` ’ 1212
`
`
`
`o+teeemakeTsbialeneereceienemeneenene
`
`Continued on Issue Siip Insida File Jacket
`
`tetoe
`CLAIMS ALLOWED
`DRAWINGS
`.
`| yTERMINAL
`
`
`DISCLAIMER SheetsDrag, ]Dnvg.[PrintFig. TotalClaims PrintClaimforO.G. |
`
`
`Gy |
`|
`(lowe.
`|
`NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED
`|
`
`CO the term ofthis patent
`subsequent to
`:
`| has been disclalmed.
`
`(date) .{
`
`megetcenaemnerreeanette$bantlnaener02
`
`i.-ATtangsigiSeptomgt
`iaeawmer+.WSS,
`7Se_.
`
`| WARNING:
`fl The Information discinsed herain may be restricled. Unauthorized disclosure may be prohibited by tha United States CodaTila 35, Ssetiane 122, 161 and 368.
`Possession outaide tha is. Patent & TredamarkOifice is restricted to suthorizedemployees and contractors only.
`amen
`FILEDwmf pisk(oar) [_JricHe [_]co-nom
`
`
`ForelBenedogs(_.._.2hle)sft
`yny
`
`} C1) The teem of this patent shall
`not extend beyond the expirationdatef
`f of U.S Patent. No.
`
`se
`
`months af
`| [1 Theterminal
`this patent have been disclalmad.
`
`,
`
`t
`ot
`an
`-4
`1
`Page 35
`
`|
`
`2 of 1365
`
`Page 352 of 1365
`
`

`

`
` 076 13826_—‘ape 2
`
`“jeB69 Ws pT3
`097613826
`SL\CONTENTS
`
`Bats Recelved
`(nel. G. of 04)
`or
`Bate Malled
`
`
`
`Bulyahoo
`nmatsJE
`
`Date Reselved
`(ct. C. of 1)
`or
`Dats Haliod
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`.
`-
`)
`
`
`i -20yd
`
`43,
`
`=
`aetna2:
`PoeaenerOnee
`
`
`
`e
`
`4
`
`‘
`
`w
`
`
`
`
`
`wraruteUTI
`
`
`
`atenementeensHei
`
`
`of1365
`
`(LEFT OUTSIDE)
`
`Page 353 of 1365
`
`

`

`
`
`
`SEARCH NOTES
`(INCLUDING SEARCH STRATEGY)
`
`puel
`
`
`id
`ansla beeen
`
`beehanpom
`
`
`falls hep tf =
`
`qhofpor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.4
`
`:
`
`{TERFERENGESEARSEARCHED
`
`
`Pr[soneTe
`
`
`
`3ftaloz
`
`Page 354 of 1365
`
`(RIGHT OUTSIDE)
`
`Page 354 of 1365
`
`

`

`ISSUE SLIP STAPLEAREA (for additional cross references)
`
`
`
`
`<&
`
`| FEE DETERMINATION
`Gul
`.£,€. CLASSIFIER
`FORMALITY REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
` 38a3ZeeZE2
`
`
`Heeeeeea:weeas:eee,SOneeataeneahuemieweoeseneenteeemcee
`atereasigenactnaseacathE=
`
`acageshamanbe..«..
`
`
`i1acecesemepamacomamed!HaeBssoeReopenReaTadstalgyAafaeMeeaOeareeaatneenB
`
`“.2eosocastepPeneannnnanaetnameee“
`neakeads.-=BBatMhRess”
`peetecateseesunssnonsatomymetate
`
` ween’
`
`EECee|A0EEaeerieeleleleale
`CHaeeeeeeTRETEEEELE
`!eeeretaloveateSteSESSSeannMaeaeASREEEMEMSsSSEMSSSh]
`
`SmetTTITITittLlillliiiltttititittiiitiiitiirrPr
`eldCOCCPPETe
`eoalPETEE
`
`8PmlsLETTYTTTTTTitirrrirrrrrTrrtdesesisreca
`
`
`
`
`
`£|_eusuo)(2(2/s(SleSlels[ssspeermere&(F/S[e|SRe[Slele18[5[8[2/s/8leisla/2/sla/s/2(3(3/815[8/812
`
`LLLP8PEEPHERECECEECHH
`maeeeeee
`eeeee
`CTOeeCoCPCECEeeeere
`LOTPPCECeECP
`ANepeeCr
`eee
`eaveieeemeee]TEPyyaer
`
`[TtttreerrryyPoiee
`
`
` SSSiileateetatotefomTSSTeeeeSn:
`
`
`wbuCye|™-2\=wielhSISeerietSfe
`
`CTTTTiaeTet
`o:.~
`
`‘‘
`meneeereerere
`
`-_. Objected
`
`
`
`INDEX OF CLAIMS
`Rejected
`...
`wwe Allowed
`A...
`an (Throughnumeral)... Canceled
`6
`Restricted
`
`
`
`NI
`
`ARS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If more than 150 claims or 10 actions
`staple additional sheet here
`
`(LEFT INSIDE)
`
`3ie
`
`fyg
`t
`
`eee355 of 1365
`
`Page 355 of 1365
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`seems
`
`
`Unrrep Srares Parent AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`COMMISSIONER POR PATENTS
`Unive StaTes PATENT AND TRAGEMARK OFFICE
`Vasuiuoms, 0.0. 20231
`wa.uspagoy
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`EMMERIENE
`
`Bib Data Sheet
`
`FILING DATE |
`ATTORNEY
`
`GROUPART UNIT|
`DOCKET NO.
`SERIAL NUMBER
`07/11/2000
`1632
`09/613,826
`01107.00031
`RULE
`
`CONFIRMATION NO. 9893
`
`|
`
`for following:
`
`Te —
`Beri Vogelstein, Baltimore, MD;
`Kenneth W.Kinzler, BelAlr, MD;
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`id CONTINUING DATA Seibiarsstehamechahasags
`THIS APPLN CLAIMS BENEFIT GF 60/146,702 08/02/1899
`
`h EQREIGN APPLICATIONS **s*tessseomssanates
`
`IF REQUIRED, FOREIGN FILING LICENSE
`08/20/2000
`
`* SMALL ENTITY **
`
`SHEETS
`STATE OR|
`COUNTRY| DRAWING
`
`MG FEE }
`eVED |
`
`S: Authority has been given in Paper
`to charge/credit DEPOSIT ACCOUNT |
`
`Page 356 of 1365
`
`Page 356 of 1365
`
`

`

`hutp/fneo:8000/preexemy/JavaProxy/jsp/bibdate/transforni
`
`«.
`
`COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS *
`Unarep Srares Parent ano TRADEMARK OFFICE
`WASHINGTON, D.G. BO23I
`wurst
`
`CONFIRMATION NO. 9893
`
`GROUP ART UNIT
`1637
`
`ATTORNEY
`DOCKET NO.
`01107.00034
`
`
`
`Unrrep Stiares Parenr AnD TrapemarK OFFrice
`
`ce
`
`*BIBDATASHEERT*
`lb D:*
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`09/613,826
`
`07/11/2000
`
`RULE
`
`APPLICANTS
`
`Bert Vogelstein, Baltimore, MD;
`
`Kenneth W.Kinzler, BetAlr, MD;
`
`CONTINUING DATA St*tet#tettansseeseraavas
`THIS APPLN CLAIMS BENEFIT OF 60/146,782 08/02/1999
`
`* FOREIGN APPLICATIONS “***teteerteeneneee
`
`gat FILING DATE
`
`FILING FEE {FEES: Authority has been given in Peper
`No.
`to charge/credit DEPOSIT ACCOUNT
`RECEIVED §No.
`for fallawing:
`
`Cl st Fees
`HCl 1.16 Fees ( Filing)
`a 1.17 Fees ( Processing Ext. of
`__jitime)
`Cl 1.18 Fees{Issue )
`
`p
`
`lof2
`
`Page 357of 1365
`
`.
`
`3/21/02 7:00 AM
`
`
`Page 357 of 1365
`
`

`

`DIGITAL AMPLIFICATION
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The identification of pre-defined mutations expected to be presentin
`a minor fraction of a cell population is important for a variety of basic
`research and clinical applications. The exponential, analog nature of the
`polymerase chain reaction is transformed into a linear, digital signal
`suitable for this purpose. Single molecules can be isolated by dilution and
`individually amplified; cach product is then separately analyzed for the
`presence of mutations: The process providesa reliable and quantitative
`measure of the proportion of variant sequences within a DNA sample.
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`32
`
`Page 358 of 1365
`
`meee weee pete
`
`Page 358 of 1365
`
`

`

`
`
`DIGITAL AMPLIFICATION
`
`This application claims the benefit ofU.S. Serial No. 60/146,792,filed
`
`August 2, 1999.
`
`The U.S. governmentretains certain rights in this invention by virtue
`ofits support of the underlying research, supported by grants CA 43460, CA
`
`
`
`In classical genetics, only mutations of the germ-line were considered
`important for understanding disease. With the realization that somatic
`mutations are the primary cause of cancer (1), and may also play a role in
`aging (2,3), new genetic principles have arisen. These discoveries have
`provided a wealth of new opportunities for patient managementas wellas for
`basic research into the pathogenesis of neoplasia. However, many of these
`opportunities hinge upon detection of a sniall number of mutant-containing
`cells among a large excess of normal cells. Examples include the detection of
`neoplastic cells in urine (4), stool (5,6), and sputum (7,8) of patients with
`cancers of the bladder, colorectum, and lung, respectively. Such detection has
`
`been shown in some cases to be possible at a stage when the primary tumors
`
`are still curable and the patients asymptomatic. Mutant sequences from the
`
`DNAofneoplastic cells have also been found in the blood of cancer patients
`(9-11). The detectionofresidual disease in lymph nodes or surgical margins
`
`10
`
`15
`
`1 D
`
`ind
`
`mn
`fod
`LJ
`
`i i
`
`n
`‘4
`‘al
`jaz
`keE*
`
`al
`
`ed
`
`Page 359 of 1365
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` /
`
`||
`\||''
`
`||'i
`
`a m
`
`ay be useful in predicting which patients might benefit most from further
`
`therapy (12-14). From a basic research standpoint, analysis of the early
`
`effects of carcinogens is often dependent on the ability to detect small
`
`populations of mutant cells (15-17).
`
`Because of the importance of this issue in so many settings, many
`
`useful techniques have been developed for the detection of mutations. DNA
`sequencing is the gold standard for the detection of germ line mutations, but
`
`is useful only when the fraction of mutated alleles is greater than ~20%
`
`(18,19). Mutant-specific oligonucleotides can sometimes be used to detect
`mutations present in a minor proportion ofthe cells analyzed, but the signal
`to noise ratio distinguishing mutant and wild-type (WT) templates is variable
`
`(20-22), The use of mutant-specific primers or the digestion of polymerase
`chain reaction (PCR) products with specific restriction endonucleases are
`
`extremely sensitive methods for detecting such mutations,butit is difficult to
`
`quantitate the fraction of mutant molecules in the starting population with
`
`these techniques (23-28). Other innovative approachesfor the detection of
`
`somatic mutations have been reviewed (29-32). A general problem with these
`
`methods is that it is difficult or impossible to independently confirm the
`
`existence of any mutationsthat are identified.
`Thus there is a need in the art for methods for accurately and
`
`quantitatively detecting genetic sequences in mixed populations ofsequences.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`It is an object of the present invention to provide methods for
`determining the presence of a selected genetic sequence in a population of
`
`10
`
`15
`
`[as
`
`25
`
`genetic sequences.
`
`It is another object of the present invention to provide molecular
`beacon probes useful in the methodofthe invention.
`These and other objects of the invention are achieved by providing a
`
`30
`
`method for determiningthe presence of a selected genetic sequence in a
`population ofgenetic sequences. A biological sample comprising nucleic acid
`template molecules is diluted to form a set of assay samples. The template
`
`molecules within the assay samples are amplified to form a population of
`
`1)
`
`Page360of1365
`
`Page 360 of 1365
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`‘amplifiedmolecules in the assay samples of the set. The amplified molecules
`in the assay samples of the set are then enalyzed to determinea first number
`
`of assay samples which contain the selected genetic sequence and a second
`
`numberof assay samples which contain a reference genetic sequence. The
`
`first number is then compared to the second numberto ascertain a ratio which
`
`reflects the composition of the biological sample.
`
`Another embodimentofthe inventionis a method for determining the
`
`ratio of a selected genetic sequence in a population of genetic sequences.
`
`Template molecules within a set comprising a plurality of assay samples are
`
`amplified to form a population of amplified molecules in each of the assay
`
`samples of the set. The amplified molecules in the assay samples of the set
`
`are analyzed to determine a first number of assay samples which contain the
`
`selected genetic sequence and a second number of assay samples which
`
`contain a reference genetic sequence. The first number is compared to the
`
`15
`
`second number to ascertain a ratio which reflects the composition of the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`biological sample.
`
`According to another embodiment of the invention, a molecular
`
`beacon probe is provided. It comprises an oligonucleotide with a stem-loop
`
`structure having a photoluminescent dye at one of the 5' or 3' ends and a
`
`quenching agentat the opposite 5' or 3’ end. The loop consists of 16 base
`
`pairs and has a T,, of 50-51°C. The stem consists of 4 base pairs having a
`
`sequence 5'-CACG-3'.
`
`A second type of molecular beacon probe is provided in another
`
`It comprises an oligonucleotide with a stem-loop structure
`embodiment.
`having @ photoluminescent dye at one of the 5' or 3' ends and a quenching
`
`agentat the opposite 5' or 3' end. The loop consists of 19-20 basepairs and
`has a T,, of 54-56°C. The stem consists of 4 base pairs having a sequence 5'-
`CACG-3.
`
`Another embodiment provides the two types of molecular beacon
`
`iW
`
`s
`hn
`fake
`had
`
`a r
`
`u
`tf
`°3
`‘ad
`bspe
`
`ma
`i
`
`30
`probes, either mixed together or provided inadivided container as a kit.
`
` Page 361 of 1365
`
`Page 361 of 1365
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` t| | ||
`
`The invention thus provides the art with the means to obtain
`quantitative assessments of particular DNA or RNA sequences in mixed
`populations of sequences using digital (binary) signals.
`
`BRIGE DESCRIPTION OF
`THE DRAWINGS
`Fic. 1. Schemdtic of experimental design. (A) The basic twosteps involved:
`PCR on diluted NA samples is followed by addition of fluorescent probes
`which discriminate
`between WT and mutant alleles and subsequent
`
`In the stem-loop
`ciple of molecular beacon analysis.
`fluorometry. (B)
`configuration, fluoreskence from a dye at the 5' end of the oligonucleotide
`probe is quenched by a Qabcyl group at the 3‘ end. Upon hybridization to a
`template, the dye is sepayated from the quencher, resulting in increased
`fluorescence. Modified
`Marras ef al. . (C) Oligonucleotide design.
`Primers FI and R1 are used to
`4mplify the genomic region of interest. Primer
`INT is used to produce single stranded DNA from the original PCR products
`during a subsequent asymmetric
`step (see Materials and Methods).
`
`whether it is WI or mutant at the
`
`queried codons. MB-GREENis a
`
`be
`i
`
`15
`
`datects the WT PCR product.
`
`Molecular Beacon which preferentially
`
`
`
`Gly12Ser and Gly12Asp,there were apparently two ofgore alleles ofmutant
`c-Ki-Ras for every WT allele; both these tumors were aneuploid.
`
`Fic. 3. Detecting Dig-PCR products with MB-RED.Specific Fluorescence
`Avaits ofrepresentative wells from an experiment employing colorectal cancer
`
`30
`
`Page 362 0f 1365.
`
`Page 362 of 1365
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cells with Gly12Asp or Gly13Asp mutations ofthe c-Ki-Ras gene, Wells with
`values >10,000 are shaded yellow. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic
`analyses of the PCR products from selected wells are shown, Wells with
`fluorescence values <3500 had no PCR productof the correct size while wells
`with fluorescence values >10,000 SFU always contained PCR products of 129
`
`bp. Non-specific products generated during the large number of cycles
`required for Dig-PCR did not affect the fluorescence analysis. M1 and M2 are
`molecular weight markers used to determine the size of fragments indicated
`
`on the left (in base pairs).
`
`20
`
`25
`
`equivalents of BNA from normal cells. Each of these registered positive with
`MB-REDand the RED/GREENratios were 1.0 +/- 0,1 (mean +/- 1 standard
`
`deviation). The wells cajored yellow contained no template DNA and each
`was negative with MB-RED\(i.c., fluorescence <3500 fluorescence units.),
`The other 288 wells contained diiyted DNA from the steol sample prepared
`
`(Rubeck et al, 1998, BioTechniques 25:588-592.)
`by alkaline extraction.
`Those registering as positive with MB-RED were colored either red or green,
`depending on their RED/GREEN ratios,
`Those registering negative with
`MB-RED were colored white. PCR products frota the indicated wells were
`
`used for automated sequence analysis.
`
`
`
`Page 363 of 1365
`
`Page 363 of 1365
`
`

`

`The method devised by the present inventors involves separately
`
`amplifying small numbers oftemplate molecules so that the resultant products
`have a proportion of the analyte sequence which is detectable by the detection
`
`means chosen. Atits limit, single template molecules can be amplified so that
`
`the products are completely mutant or completely wild-type (WT). The
`
`homogeneity of these amplification products makes them trivial to distinguish
`
`through existing techniques.
`
`The method requires analyzing a large number of amplified products
`
`simply and reliably. Techniques for such assessments were developed, with
`
`the output providing a digital readout of the fraction of mutantalleles in the
`analyzed population.
`The biological sampleis diluted to a point at which a practicafly usable
`
`number of the diluted samples contain a proportion of the selected genetic
`
`sequence (analyte) relative to total template molecules such that the analyzing
`
`10
`
`ad
`
`15
`
`technique being used can detect the analyte. A practically usable number of
`
`diluted samples will depend on cost of the analysis method. Typically it
`
`would be desirable that at least 1/50 of the diluted samples have a detectable
`
`proportion of analyte, Atleast 1/10, 1/5, 3/10, 2/5, 1/2, 3/5, 7/10, 4/5, or 9/10
`
`of the diluted samples may have a detectable proportion of analyte. The
`
`higher the fraction of samples which will provide useful information, the
`more economical will be the overall assay. Over-dilution will also lead to
`aloss of economy, as many samples will be analyzed and provide no signal,
`
`A particularly prefered degree ofdilution is to a point where each of the assay
`
`samples has on average one-half of a template. The dilution can be performed
`
`from more concentrated samples. Alternatively, dilute sources of template
`nucleic acids can be used. All of the samples may contain amplifable
`template molecules, Desirably each assay sample prior to amplification will
`
`contain less than a hundred or less than ten template molecules.
`
`Digital amplification can be used to detect mutations present at
`
`25
`
`30
`
`relatively low levels in the samples to be analyzed. Thelimit of detection is
`
`defined by the number of wells that can be analyzed and the intrinsic mutation
`rate of the polymerase used for amplification. 384 well PCR plates are
`
`eeeteee,
`
`i
`
`Page 3640/1365
`
`Page 364 of 1365
`
`

`


`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`commercially available and 1536 well plates are on the horizon,theoretically
`allowing sensitivities for mutation detection at the ~0.1% level. It is also
`possible that Digital Amplification can be performed in microarray format,
`potentially increasing the sensitivity by another order of magnitude. This
`sensitivity may ultimately be limited by polymerase errors. The effective
`error rate in PCR as performed under our conditions was <0.3%,
`i.e. in
`control experiments with DNA from normal cells, none of 340 wells
`containing PCR products exhibited RED/GREEN ratios >3.0. Any individual
`mutation (such as a G- to C- transversion at the second position of codon 12
`of c-Ki-ras) is expected to occur in <I in 50 polymerase-generated mutants
`(there are at least 50 base substitutions within or surrounding codons 12 and
`13 that should yield high RED/GREEN ratios). Determining the sequence of
`the putative mutarits in the positive wells, by direct sequencing as performed
`here or by any of the other techniques, provides unequivocal validation of a
`prospective mutation: a significant fraction of the mutations found in
`individual wells should be identical if the mutation occurred in vivo.
`Significance can be established through rigorous statistical analysis, as
`positive signals should be distributed according to Poisson probabilities.
`Moreover,the error rate in particular Digital Amplification experiments can
`be precisely determined through performance of Digital Amplification on
`DNAtemplates from normal cells.
`Digital Amplification is as easily applied to RT-PCR products
`generated from RNA templates as it is to genomic DNA. For example, the
`fraction of alternatively spliced or mutanttranscripts from a gene can be easily
`determined using photoluminescent probes specific for each of the PCR
`, products generated. Similarly, Digital Amplification can be used to quantitate
`relative levels of gene expression within an RNA population. For this
`amplification, each well would contain primers which are used to amplify a
`reference transcript expressed constitutively as well as primers specific for the
`experimental transcript. One photoluminescentprobe would then be used to
`detect PCR products
`from the reference transcript and a second
`photoluminescent probe used for the test transcript. The number of wells in
`
`7
`
`ad
`
`i‘
`
`hi
`IsBs
`id
`te
`fig
`it
`its
`
`td
`‘af
`[aBs
`jac
`id
`tee
`
`
`
`Page365°6f T3657 *
`
`
`
`Page 365 of 1365
`
`

`

`1
`
`which the test transcript is amplified divided by the number of wells in which
`the reference transcript is amplified provides a quantitative measure of gene
`expression. Another group of examplesinvolves the investigations of allelic
`status when two mutations are observed upon sequence analysis of a standard
`DNA sample. To distinguish whether one variantis present in each allele (vs.
`both occurringin oneallele), cloning ofPCR products is generally performed.
`The approach described here would simplify the analysis by eliminating the
`need for cloning. Other potential applications of Digital Amplification are
`listed in Table 1, When the goal is the quantitation of the proportion of two
`relatively commonalleles or transcripts rather than the detection of rare
`alleles, techniques such as those émploying TaqMan and real time PCR
`provide an excellent alternative to use of molecular beacons. Advantages of
`real time PCR methods include their simplicity and the ability to analyze
`multiple samples simultaneously. However, Digital Amplification may prove
`useful for these applications when the expected differences are small,(¢.g.,
`only ~2-fold, such as occurs with allelic imbalances (55)),
`The ultimate utility of Digital Amplification lies in its ability to
`convert the intrinsically exponentialnatureofPCR. to a linear one. It should
`therebyproveuseful forexperiments requiringtheinvestigation ofindividual
`alleles, rare variants/mutations, orquantitativeanalysisofPCRproducts,
`In one preferred embodiment each diluted sample has on average one
`halfa template molecule. This is the same as dne halfofthediluted samples
`having one template molecule. This can be empirically determined by
`amplification. Hither the analyte (selected genetic sequence) or the reference
`genetic sequence can be used for this determination. Ifthe analysis method
`being used can detect analyte when presentat a level of 20%, then one must
`dilute such that a significant numberof diluted essay samples contain more
`than 20% of analyte. If the analysis method being used requires 100% analyte
`to detect, then dilution down to the single template molecule level will be
`
`required.
`To achieve a dilution to approximately a single template molecule
`level, one can dilute such that between 0.1 and 0.9 ofthe assay samplesyield
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`o
`an
`Md
`e
`ih
`“5
`2
`S
`ry
`
`Page 366 of 1365
`
`8
`
`(/
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`
`|
`
`Page 366 of 1365
`
`

`

` I|| ||: || ||i:
`
`an amplification product. More pteferably the dilution will be to between 0.1
`and 0.6, more preferably to between 0.3 and 0.5 of the assay samples yielding
`
`an amplification product.
`
`The digital atoplification method requires analysis of a large number
`
`of samples to get meaningful results. Preferably at least ten diluted assay
`
`samples are amplified and analyzed. More preferably at least 15, 20, 25, 30,
`
`40, 50, 75, 100, 500, or 1000 diluted assay samples are amplified and
`
`analyzed. As in any method, the accuracy of the determination will improve
`as the numberof samples increases, up to a point. Because a large number of
`samples must be analyzed,it is desirable to reduce the manipulative steps, —
`especially sample transfer steps. Thus it is preferred that the steps of
`
`amplifying and analyzing ace performed in the same receptacle. This makes
`
`the method an in situ, or “one-pot” method,
`
`The numberof different situations in which the digital amplification
`
`method will find application is large. Some of these are listed in Table 1. As
`
`shown in the examples, the method can be used to find a tumor mutation in a
`
`population of cells which is not purely tumor cells. As described in the
`examples, a probe for a particular mutation need not be used, but diminution
`
`in binding to a wild-type probe can be used as an indicator of the presence of
`one or more mutations. Chromosomaltranslocations which are characteristic
`
`of leukemias or lymphomas can be detected as a measure of the efficacy of
`
`therapy. Gene amplifications are characteristic of certain disease states.
`These can be measured using digital amplification. Alternatively spliced
`
`forms of a transcript can be detected and quantitated relative to other forms of
`
`the transcript using digital amplification on CDNA made from mRNA.
`
`es
`iG
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Similarly, using cDNA made from mRNA one can determinerelative levels
`of transcription of two different genes. One can usedigital amplification to
`
`distinguish betweena situation where oneallele carries two mutations and one
`mutation is carried on each of two alleles in an individual. Allelic imbalances
`
`30
`
`often result from a disease state.
`
`Thése can be detected using digital
`
`preOTEECTEFETEre
`
`STrwSeeEencratsetvtentseotkey
`
`amplification.
`
`Page 367 of 1365
`
`Page 367 of 1365
`
`

`

`Biological samples which can be used as the starting material for the
`analyses may be from any fissue or body sample fram which DNA or mRNA
`can be isolated. Preferred sources include stool, blood, and lymph nodes.
`
`Preferably the biological sample is a cell-free lysate.
`
`i)
`Ct
`
`i
`
`fou
`
`10
`
`Page’368 of T3657 ~”
`
`~~
`
`Page 368 of 1365
`
`

`

`jouedsomoneWoysouenbeswooydureangisouenbas
`
`
`
`Q]STTepswwoojsmenpoweoo[smen10jeoRIOu
`
`
`Woa-TiqJosuoneonddyyenusog*]sqeL
`
`UOPRINM!GUO“SAPSENUTSs[STTBjWAIS_IPOAL,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JoYNQ)Adzroipioypesy[soeleRMayTeNpIsey
`
`
`DonEogydurejo1u2jxeJosouesaidsuyuLss}9q]
`omdiomsjod-nouwisiskeaesaneynuEng
`
`poordsApoaneuayejoUOTSey]suTIS}Eq,
`
`
`(CYNQ)o008cmeswayqdiosien
`
`
`So[9TT2OMYJOYORSTh
`Ajoanraryy|enmanta|SUOREDOSTEH
`HODETROMOSTDOFT
`peoyds
`souepeqarTey
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sjonpoidydLAAsapoyreLAAJOyuwnuydurdy‘pool‘[oo%sursuoNEINMIsNe8JeouRDnOnMAsSGnsoseg
`
`Page 369 of 1365
`
`qat
`
`“yo |
`
`ed
`
`
`
`
`
`GSS,3825.2F74200
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TigsulosOouOIysoares
`
`Ssopoyye
`
`(VN
`
`sapou
`
`suonBING
`
`jewosomoryD
`
`
`
`smoOsoulonpsmosomon)
`
`SICHIEU
`
`il
`
`
`
`oasyJOTorssaidxeJoseas]SANE]ayOUNEIZOC]oudutsosueysao
`
`(YNRDseued
`
`uorssaidxa
`
`Page 369 of 1365
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`b
`a
`BCS
`5
`ie
`"5
`a
`je
`‘3
`
`20
`
`Molecular beacon probes according to the present invention can utilize
`
`any photoluminescent moiety as a detectable moiety. Typically these are
`
`dyes. Often these are fluorescent dyes. Photoluminescence is any process
`
`in which a material is excited by radiation such as light, is raised to an
`‘excited electronic or vibronic State, and subsequently re-emits that
`excitation energy as a photonoflight, Such processes include fluorescence,
`
`which denotes emission accompanying descent from an excitedstate with
`
`paired electrons (a "singlet" state) or unpaired electrons {a "triplet" state)
`
`to a lower state with the same multiplicity, i.¢., a quantum-mechanically
`“allowed” transition. Photoluminescence also includes phosphorescence
`
`which denotes emission eccompanying descent from an excited triplet or
`
`singlet state to a lower state of different multiplicity, 1.2, a quantum
`mechanically "forbidden" transition. Compared to “allowed"transitions,
`“forbidden” transitions are associated with relatively longer excited state
`lifetimes.
`Thequenching ofphotoluminescencemay be analyzedbya variety of
`methods which vary primarily in terms of signal transduction. Quenching
`may be transduced as changes in the intensity ofphotoluminescence or as
`changes in the ratio of photoluminescence intensities at two different
`wavelengths, or as chatiges in photoluminescence lifetimes, or even as
`changes in the polarization (anisotropy) of photoluminescence. Skilled
`practitioners will recognize that instrumentation for the measurement of
`these varied photoluminescent responses are known. The particular
`
`tatiometric methods for the analysis of quenching in the instant examples
`
`25
`
`should not be construed as limiting the invention to any particular form of
`
`signal transduction. Ratiometric measurements of photoluminescence
`
`in intensity,
`intensity can include the measurement of changes
`photoluminescence lifetimes, or even polarization (anisotropy).
`
`Although the working examples demonstrate the use of molecular
`
`30
`
`beacon probes as the meansof analysis of the amplified dilution samples,
`other techniques can be used as well. These include sequencing, gel
`
`12
`
`tf
`
`Page 3700f1365
`
`2 =
`
`~~. __
`
`a
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Page 370 of 1365
`
`

`

`TagMan™ (dual-labeled fluorogenic) probes (Perkin Elmer Corp/Applied
`Biosystems, Foster City, Calif), pyrene-labeled probes, and other
`biochemical assays.
`
`The above disclosure generally describes the present invention. A
`more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following
`specific examples which ere provided herein for purposes of illustration
`only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
`
`Step 1: PCR amplifications, The optimal conditions for PCR described
`in this section were determined by varying the parameters described in the
`Results. PCR was performed in 7 ul volumes in 96 well polypropylene
`PCR plates (Marsh Biomedical Products, Rochester, NY).
`The
`composition of the reactions was: 67 mM Tris, pH 8.8, 16.6 mM NH,SO,
`6.7 mM MgCl,, 10 mM B-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM dATP, 1 mM dCTP,1
`mM dGTP, 1 mM TTP, 6% DMSO,1 uM primer F1, 1 uM primer RI, 0.05
`units/ul Platinum Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.), and “one-half
`genome equivalent” of DNA. To determine the amount of DNA
`corresponding to one-half genomeequivalent, DNA samples were serially
`diluted and tested via PCR. The amount that yielded amplification
`products in half the wells, usually ~1.5 pg of total DNA, was defined as
`"one-half genome equivalent” and used in each well of subsequent Digital
`Amplification experiments. Fifty ul light mineral oil (Sigma M-3516) was
`added to each well and reactions performed in a HybAid Thermal cycler
`at the following temperatures: denaturation at 94° for one min; 60 cycles
`of 94° for 15 sec, 55° for 15 sec., 70° for 15 seconds; 70° for five minutes.
`
`Reactions were read immediately or stored at room temperature for up to
`
`36 hours before fluorescence analysis.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`led
`
`3W
`
`i
`fab
`
`Page 371 of 1365
`
`13
`
`I
`
`EXAMPLE1
`
`
`
`Page 371 of 1365
`
`

`

`EXAMPLE2
`
`
`
`
`
`EXAMPLE3
`
`
`
`creatntae
`
`||
`
`|
`
`Step 2: Fluorescence analysis. 3.5 ul of a solution with the following
`
`composition was added to each well: 67 mM Tris, pH 8.8, 16.6 mM
`NH,SO,6.7 mM MgCl, 10 mM §-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM dATP, 1 mM
`dCTP, 1 mM dGTP, 1 mM TTP, 6% DMSO, 5 uM primer INT, 1 uM
`
`MB-GREEN, 1 uM MB-RED,0,1 units/u] Platinum Taq polymerase. The
`
`plates were centrifuged for 20 seconds at 6000 g and fluorescence read at
`excitation/emission wavelengths of 485 nm/530 nm for MB-GREEN and
`
`530 nm/590 nm for MB-RED.The fluorescence in wells without template
`
`was typically 10,000 to 20,000 fluorescence "units", with about 75%
`emanating from the fluorometer background and the remainder from the
`
`MB probes. The plates were then placed in a thermal cycler for asymmetric
`
`amplification at the following temperatures: 94° for one minute; 10 - 15
`cycles of 94° for 15 sec, 55° for 15 sec., 70° for 15 seconds; 94° for one
`minute; and 60° for five minutes. The plates were then incubated atroom
`femperaturé for ten to sixty minutes and fluorescence measured as
`described above. Specific fluorescence was defined as the difference in
`fluorescence before and after the asymmetric amplification. RED/GREEN
`ratios were defined as the specific fluoreacence of MB-RED divided by
`that of MB-GREEN, RED/GREEN ratios were normalized to the ratio
`
`exhibited by the positive controls (25 genome equivalents of DNA from
`normal cells, as defined above in Example 1). We found that the ability of
`
`MB probesto discriminate between WT and mutant sequences under our
`conditions could not be reliably determined from experiments in which
`
`they were tested by hybridization to relatively short complementary single
`stranded oligonucleotides, and that actual PCR products had to be used for
`validation.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`id
`
`2w
`
`i
`fa
`iJ
`mn
`fu
`wf
`
`i“
`
`i
`jab
`
`a“
`
`j
`i
`
`30ra
`
`Oligonucleotid
`
`and
`
`DNA
`
`sequencing.
`
`Primer
`
`§'-CATGTTCTAATATAGTCACATTTICA-3;
`
`Primer
`
`FI:
`
`RI:
`
`5'-TCTGAATTA
`
`GTATCGTCAAGG-3';
`
`Primer
`
`INT:
`
`Page 372 of 1365
`
`14
`
`a
`
`Page 372 of 1365
`
`

`

`5'-TAGCTGTATCGTCAAGGCAC-3';
`
`MB-RED:
`
`§'.Cy3-CACGGGCCTGCTGAAAATGACTGCGTG-Dabcyl-3';
`M
`B
`-
`G
`R
`EB
`EB
`N
`
`5'-Fluorescein-CACGGGAGCTGGTGGCGTAGCGTG-Dabcyl-3'.
`
`Molecular Beacons (33,34) were synthesized by Midland Scientific and
`
`other oligonucleotides were synthesized by Gene Link (Thornwood, NY).
`All were dissolved at 50 uM in TE (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0/ 1 mM EDTA) and
`
`kept frozen and in the dark until use. PCR products were purified using
`QlAquick PCR purification kits (Qiagen).
`In the relevant experiments
`describedin the text, 20% ofthe product from single wells was used for gel
`
`electrophoresis and 40% was used for each sequencing reaction. The
`primer
`used
`for
`sequencing
`was
`5-CATTATTITTATTATAAGGCCTGC-3'. Sequencing was performed
`
`using fluorescently-labeled ABI Big Dye terminators and an ABI 377
`
`automated sequencer.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`wt
`
`EXAMPLE4
`
`Principles underlying experiment. The experimentis outlined in Fig.
`1A. First, the DNA is diluted into multiwell plates so that there is, on
`
`average, one template molecule per two wells, and PCR is performed.
`Second, the individual wells are analyzed for the presence ofPCR products
`of mutant and WT sequence using fluorescent probes.
`
`As the PCR products resulting from the amplification of single
`template molecules should be homogeneous in sequence, a variety of
`standard techniques could be used to assess their presence. Fluorescent
`
`probe-based technologies, which can be performed on the PCR products
`“in situ" (i.e. in the same wells) are particularly well-suited for this
`application (31, 33-40). We chose to explore the utility of one such
`technology, involving Molecular Beacons (MB),for this purpose (33,34).
`MB probes are oligonucleotides with

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket