`Tel: 571.272.7822
`
`Paper 20
`Entered: October 31, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`R2 SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00705; Case IPR2017-00706
`Case IPR2017-00707; Case IPR2017-00708
`Case IPR2017-01123; Case IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JEAN R. HOMERE and JENNIFER S. BISK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BISK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705; IPR2017-00706
`IPR2017-00707; IPR2017-00708
`IPR2017-01123; IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`
`On October 27, 2017, counsel and the panel discussed changes in the
`briefing schedules in these cases1 to accommodate the Federal Circuit’s decision in
`Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, No. 2015-1177, 2017 WL 4399000 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4,
`2017). As discussed, this order (1) resets the due dates set in Paper 11 and
`modified in Papers 12 and 19, and (2) changes the default maximum pages in the
`briefing related to the motion to amend.
`
`The parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE DATES 1–6, with the
`exception that the due date for the request for oral argument may not be extended
`past March 26, 2018. The parties are encouraged to work together to
`accommodate any further changes, including the distribution of allowed pages in
`the briefing on the motion to amend. If the parties cannot agree on a change that
`one party feels is warranted, the parties should contact the Board with several
`proposed times for a conference call to address the issue.
`
`DUE DATE 1 .................................................................. November 20, 2017
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend—no more than 12 pages
`
`DUE DATE 2 ....................................................................... January 31, 2018
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s response to the motion to amend—no more than 25 pages
`
`
`1 This order refers to papers in IPR2017-00705, but also applies to the
`corresponding papers in the other listed cases.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705; IPR2017-00706
`IPR2017-00707; IPR2017-00708
`IPR2017-01123; IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`DUE DATE 3 ........................................................................... March 2, 2018
`
` Patent Owner’s reply to the motion to amend—no more than 25 pages
`
`DUE DATE 3B ........................................................................ March 23, 2018
`
` Petitioner’s sur-reply to the motion to amend—no more than 12 pages
` Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................. April 2, 2018
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................... April 16, 2018
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ........................................................................... April 23, 2018
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 .............................................................................. May 1, 2018
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705; IPR2017-00706
`IPR2017-00707; IPR2017-00708
`IPR2017-01123; IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Richard Goldenberg
`Donald Steinberg
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`don.steinberg@wilmerhale.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Glass
`John McKee
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`imglass@quinnemanuel.com
`ohnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
