throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 62
`571-272-7822
`
`Entered: September 25, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VIDSTREAM, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, and
`JESSICA C. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order will be entered in each case. The parties are not authorized to
`use this caption style.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have each filed requests for oral hearing
`in the above captioned proceedings, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70.
`IPR2017-01131, Papers 58, 61.2 Both parties propose that the hearing for
`these cases be combined and that each party be allocated sixty (60) minutes
`to present its argument for the combined hearing. Paper 58, 2; Paper 61, 1.
`The requests are granted according to the terms set forth in this Order.
`The combined oral hearing will commence at approximately 3:15 PM
`Eastern Time3 on Friday, October 19, 2018, in Hearing Room B on the ninth
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`Each party will have sixty (60) minutes total time to present its arguments in
`the above-captioned proceedings. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of
`proof that the claims at issue in these reviews are unpatentable. Therefore,
`at oral argument, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case regarding
`the challenged patent claims and the grounds on which the Board instituted
`trial. Petitioner may reserve some (but not more than half) of its argument
`time to respond to arguments presented by the Patent Owner. After
`Petitioner’s initial presentation, Patent Owner will be given an opportunity
`to respond and also may reserve some of its argument time for sur-rebuttal.
`Thereafter, Petitioner may use any reserved time to reply to Patent Owner’s
`presentation, and finally, Patent Owner may present a brief sur-rebuttal if it
`has reserved time.
`
`
`2 For convenience, we cite to papers in IPR2017-01131. Similar papers
`were filed in IPR2017-01133.
`3 Upon conclusion of the hearing for IPR2017-00829 and IPR2017-00830,
`there will be a short recess, followed by the commencement of the hearing
`for IPR2017-01131 and IPR2017-01133.
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)
`
`
`New arguments not previously presented in the parties’ substantive
`papers in these proceeding shall not be raised at oral hearing, and no live
`testimony from any witness will be taken at the oral argument. The hearing
`will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Please be advised,
`available seating is limited. The Board will provide a court reporter, and the
`reporter’s transcript shall constitute the official record of the oral hearing.
`The parties shall serve any demonstrative exhibits on opposing
`counsel at least seven business days before the hearing or at least seven
`business days before the pre-hearing conference if one is scheduled. The
`parties shall also provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to
`the Board no later than five business days before the hearing, or five
`business days prior to a pre-hearing conference if one is scheduled, by
`emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov. In addition, the parties shall file any
`demonstrative exhibits in these proceedings within two days of the hearing.
`Demonstrative exhibits are not evidence and are intended only to assist the
`parties in presenting their oral argument to the panel. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27,
`2014) (Paper 65) for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits. The parties shall confer with each other regarding
`any objections to demonstrative exhibits. For any issue that cannot be
`resolved after conferring, the parties may each send by email to
`Trials@uspto.gov a one-page list of objections at least two business days
`before the hearing if no pre-hearing conference is requested or two business
`days before a pre-hearing conference if one is scheduled. The list should
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)
`
`identify with particularity which demonstrative exhibits are subject to
`objection and include a short statement of the reason for each objection and
`the reason the other party opposes the objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and, if no
`pre-hearing conference is requested, may schedule a telephone conference if
`deemed necessary. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not
`timely presented may be considered waived.
`No later than DUE DATE 6, either party may request a pre-hearing
`conference, which if requested, will be held at 12:00 PM Eastern Time on
`Tuesday, October 16, 2018. Prior to such a request, the parties shall meet
`and confer to discuss potential issues for the pre-hearing conference. The
`parties shall then send a joint request to the Board by email to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Such a request shall include a bullet list of items the
`parties would like to discuss with the panel, which may include:
`• a brief preview (but not argument) as to issues the parties plan
`to address at the oral hearing;
`• issues for which the parties would like the panel’s guidance on
`whether to address at the oral hearing;
`• a limited number of objections in the parties’ motions to
`exclude for which a party seeks early resolution; and
`• any motions to strike.
`If the parties are unable to agree on the issues to be addressed at the
`pre-hearing conference, the joint request shall specify which issues are
`disputed and provide a brief statement (not to exceed one sentence) of the
`opposing party’s objection.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)
`
`
`The panel may, at its discretion, indicate certain issues during the pre-
`hearing conference that it wishes the parties to emphasize at the oral hearing.
`Although the parties and the panel may discuss issues for the oral hearing at
`the pre-hearing conference, the issues discussed at the pre-hearing
`conference do not limit the scope of the oral hearing. Instead, the parties
`remain free to address at the oral hearing any issue properly raised during
`the trial, and the panel may ask questions on issues other than those
`identified at the pre-hearing conference. The parties may also discuss
`objections to demonstrative exhibits at the pre-hearing conference, but the
`panel may reserve ruling on such objections until a later time.
`The parties are reminded that, at the oral hearing, the presenter must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript, and to assist Judge Boudreau who will
`join the hearing remotely from San Jose, California, and Judge Kaiser who
`will join the hearing remotely from Denver, Colorado. Judge Boudreau and
`Judge Kaiser will be unable to view images projected in the hearing room.
`Similarly, to ensure presenters may be heard by Judge Boudreau and Judge
`Kaiser, the parties are reminded to speak only when standing at the hearing
`room podium and toward the attached microphone. No live testimony from
`any witness will be taken at the oral argument. The Board expects lead
`counsel for each party to be present in person at the oral hearing. Any
`counsel of record, however, may present the party’s argument. If either
`party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be attending the oral argument,
`the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the Board no
`later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)
`
`
`The parties may request the use of audio-visual equipment during the
`oral hearing. Such requests should be directed to Trials@uspto.gov at least
`five business days in advance of the hearing date. If the request is not
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the
`hearing.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the oral arguments for IPR2017-01131 and IPR2017-
`01133 will be consolidated,4 and the consolidated oral argument shall take
`place on Friday, October 19, 2018, in Hearing Room B on the ninth floor of
`Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, at approximately
`3:15 PM Eastern Time; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties should note that arguments
`made at the consolidated oral hearing shall have application only in
`proceeding(s) the record of which supports the argument.
`
`
`
`
`4 The proceedings, however, have not been consolidated.
`6
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01131 (Patent 8,464,304 B2)
`IPR2017-01133 (Patent 8,601,506 B2)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Todd Siegel A
`Andrew Mason
`Robert T. Cruzen
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`Todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`Andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`Rob.cruzen@klarquist.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Eagle Robinson
`Eric Hall
`Eric Green
`NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
`eagle.robinson@nortonrosefulbright.com
`eric.hall@nortonrosefulbright.com
`eric.green@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket