throbber
One World Technologies, Inc. (Petitioner)
`v.
`The Chamberlain Group, Inc. (Patent Owner)
`Patent Owner Demonstratives
`Case Nos. IPR2017-01132 / IPR2017-01137
`U.S. Patent No. 6,998,977
`Before Hon. Joni Y. Chang, Justin T. Arbes, and Jon M. Jurgovan
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`1
`
`CG 2002
`Techtronic v. Chamberlain
`IPR2017-01132
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`
`Section
`Introduction
`Menard does not anticipate independent claims 1 and 12
`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`Menard does not anticipate Claim 14
`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`Menard does not anticipate Claim 18
`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`Kennametal does not permit missing elements in the prior art
`to be filled in
`
`Slide
`3
`11
`23
`29
`36
`50
`54
`63
`70
`
`2
`
`

`

`Introduction
`
`Introduction
`
`3
`
`

`

`Instituted Grounds
`IPR2017-01132
`• Ground 1 – Claims 12-21 anticipated by Menard
`• Ground 2 – Claims 13 and 21 obvious over Menard in view of Lee
`
`IPR2017-01137
`• Ground 1 – Claims 1-4, 6-11 and 22-25 anticipated by Menard
`• Ground 2 – Claims 11 and 25 obvious over Menard in view of Lee
`• Ground 3 – Claim 5 obvious over Menard in view of Held
`• Ground 4 – Claim 5 obvious over Menard in view of HomeRF
`
`4
`
`

`

`Independent Claim 12
`
`‘977 Patent, claim 12
`
`5
`
`

`

`Independent Claim 1
`
`‘977 Patent, claim 1
`
`6
`
`

`

`Menard, paragraph 50
`
`Menard, ¶ 50
`
`7
`
`

`

`Dependent Claim 9
`
`Dependent Claim 9
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Dependent Claim 14
`
`Dependent Claim 14
`
`14. A method of claim 12 further comprising the step of
`
`?
`
`9
`
`

`

`Dependent Claims 17-20
`
`Dependent Claims 17-20
`
`17. The method of claim 12—
`_
`
`'18. The apparatus of claim '17—
`
` 10
`
`10
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate
`Independent claims 1 and 12
`
`11
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`
`‘977 Patent, claim 1
`
`12
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`
`‘977 Patent, claim 12
`
`13
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Petition, p. 19
`
`14
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`
`Menard, ¶ 50
`
`‘977 patent, claim 12
`
`15
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Patent Owner:
`
`Menard – the source of the “inquiry” is not express
`
`POR, pp. 4-5
`
`16
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Patent Owner:
`
`Menard – the source of the “inquiry” is not inherent
`
`POR, pp. 9-10:
`
`17
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Patent Owner:
`
`Menard – the “inquiry” is not inherently over the network;
`other possibilities exist
`
`POR, p. 12:
`
`18
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Patent Owner:
`
`Menard – other possible sources of the “inquiry”
`
`POR, p. 12:
`
`19
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Patent Owner:
`Menard – other
`possible sources of
`the “inquiry”
`
`POR, pp. 12-13
`
`20
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Menard – other possible sources of the “inquiry”
`
`Reply, p. 13, note 7
`
`21
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claims 1 & 12
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 12:
`
`22
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`
`23
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`
`24
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Petition, p. 39:
`
`25
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 26:
`
`26
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 26:
`
`27
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 9
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 26:
`
`28
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 14
`
`29
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 14
`
`30
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 14
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 19
`
`31
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 14
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 20
`
`32
`
`

`

`Claim 14: ReFLEX
`
`Petitioner argues:
`Claim 14: ReFLEX
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`When combined with the optional PocketGenie
`
`Internet service package, the pager could navigate and display webpages at least as
`
`early as 2001. Ex.1014fl55. Patent-Owner’s expert has taken the position that
`
`(Motorola). . ..”), 110043 (disclosing “ReFLEX (by Motorola)”); Ex.1014‘|l5 8.
`
`“Menard includes no express disclosure describing” such a pager. Ex.20011l43.
`
`This.» however, is also incorrect,as—
`
`See Ex.1003110049 (“Examples of two way pager protocols include ReFLEXTM
`
`Reply, p. 23
`
`33
`
`

`

`Claim 14: ReFLEX
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Citing Menard:
`
`Reply, p. 23
`
`Menard, ¶ 49
`
`Menard, ¶ 43
`
`34
`
`

`

`Claim 14: ReFLEX
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Reply, p. 23
`
`Citing Lipoff:
`
`Ex. 1014, ¶ 58
`
`35
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`36
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`37
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`38
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Petition, p. 37:
`
`39
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 21:
`
`40
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Reply, p. 25
`In support Petitioner cites the ‘977 patent:
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘977 patent), 1:55-60
`
`41
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Citing ‘977 patent:
`
`Reply, p. 25
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘977 patent), claim 12
`
`42
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Reply, p. 25
`
`43
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 21
`
`44
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`Patent Owner cites:
`
`POR, p. 21
`
`45
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 21
`
`46
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Reply, p. 24
`
`47
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`
`But Petitioner also argues:
`
`Reply, p. 4
`
`Reply, p. 4
`
`48
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 17
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`Reply, p. 25
`
`POR, p. 21
`
`49
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 18
`
`50
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 18
`
`51
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 18
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Menard states:
`
`Reply, p. 25:
`
`Menard, ¶ 69
`
`52
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 18
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 23
`
`53
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`54
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`55
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`56
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Petition, p. 39:
`
`57
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 25
`
`58
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`Menard states:
`
`Menard, ¶ 50
`
`59
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`Menard states:
`
`Menard, ¶ 48
`
`60
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Reply, p. 26
`
`61
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 19
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`Reply, p. 26
`
`POR, p. 21
`
`62
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`
`63
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`
`64
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`
`65
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Petition, p. 39:
`
`66
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`POR, p. 26:
`
`67
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Reply, p. 26
`
`68
`
`

`

`Menard does not anticipate Claim 20
`Petitioner argues:
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`Reply, p. 26
`
`POR, p. 21
`
`69
`
`

`

`Kennametal does not permit missing
`elements in the prior art to be filled in
`
`70
`
`

`

`Kennametal (Fed. Cir. 2015)
`
`* Quotes from Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co. Ltd., 851 F.3d 1270, 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
`(cited at POR, pp. 27-28)
`
`71
`
`

`

`Nidec (Fed. Cir. 2017)
`
`Nidec (Fed. Cir. 2017)
`
`‘—
`
`-. Rather, Kennametal addresses Whether the disclosure
`
`of a limited number of combination possibilities discloses one of
`
`the possible combinations.” Nidec at 1274.
`
`
`
`_ [] simply because a skilled artisan would
`
`immediately envision them.” Nidec at 1274 (internal quotes and
`
`72
`
`cites omitted).
`
`

`

`WesternGeco (Fed. Cir. May 2018)
`
`73
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket