throbber
i t
`
`h
`
`d't.|
`
`firsnns
`
`
`
`EhT
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.(If:.579:1"..inSlgtallwul55.1.51»...
`
`Exhibit 1022
`U.S. Patent No. 6,108,388
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`"-7:"mp13‘$1-'fi‘nlu-r-rig—fitl‘fm'wmmmzaJenna—u...
`
`
`
`
`
`Published in the USA and
`Canada by Halsted Press,
`a Division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`New York
`
`© Copyright J. D. Parsons, 1992
`
`
`
`many“'.'..'.'.'
`3:31ngI.‘4+m-_.__
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`Parsons, J. D. (John David)
`The mobile radio propagation channel / J.D. Parsons.
`p.
`cm.
`includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-470-21824-X
`2. Radio--Transmitters and
`1. Mobile radio stations.
`transmission.
`3. Radio wave propagation.
`I. Title.
`TK6570.M6P38
`1991
`621.3845--dc20
`
`91-31593CIP
`
`Printed in Great Britain by BPCC Wheatons Ltd, Exeter
`
`
`
`

`

`The figbile Radio
`Progagatior; {Zhagrgel
`
`]. D. i’arsons, DSdEng), FEng, FlEE
`Professor of Electrical Engineering, University of Liverpool
`
`Halsted Press: a division of
`jOHN WILEY & SONS
`New York=Toronto
`
`
`
`

`

`Contents
`
`1
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.1 Background
`1.2 Modes of propagation and the uses of different frequency bands
`1.2.1 VLF
`1.2.2 LF and MF
`1.2.3 HF
`1.2.4 VHF and UHF
`1.2.5 SHF
`1.2.6 EHF
`1.3 Choice of operating frequency for mobile radio systems
`1.3.1 Radio links
`
`1.3.2 Area coverage
`References
`
`2
`2.1
`2.2
`2.3
`
`FUNDAMENTALS OF VHF AND UHF PROPAGATION
`Introduction
`Propagation in free space
`Propagation over a reflecting surface
`2.3.1 The reflection coefficient of the earth
`2.3.2 Propagation over a curved reflecting surface
`2.3.3 Propagation over a plane reflecting surface
`2.4 Ground roughness
`2.5 The effect of the atmosphere
`2.5.1 Atmospheric ducting and non-standard refraction
`References
`
`3
`PROPAGATION OVER IRREGULAR TERRAIN
`3.1
`Introduction
`3.2 Huygen’s Principle
`3.3 Diffraction over terrain obstacles
`3.3.1 Fresnel-zone ellipsoids
`3.3.2 Diffraction losses
`3.4 Multiple knife-edge diffraction
`3.4.1
`Bullington’s equivalent knife-edge
`3.4.2
`The Epstein-Peterson method
`3.4.3
`The Japanese method
`3.4.4
`The Deygout method
`Comparison
`
`3.4.5_
`
`
`
`MNOOONNQONONUI-PF—‘F‘
`
`r—i—H—n
`
`51
`
`l6
`16
`17
`19
`20
`22
`24
`26
`28
`31
`34
`
`35
`35
`36
`37
`39
`40
`48
`48
`48
`49
`50
`
`

`

`viii
`
`3.5
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Path loss prediction models
`3.5.1 The Egli model
`3.5.2 The JRC method
`
`3.5.3 The Blomquist — Ladell model
`3.5.4 The Longley — Rice models
`3.5.5 CCIR methods
`3.5.6 The BBC method
`3.5.7 Other methods
`Discussion
`
`References
`
`PROPAGATION IN BUILT-UP AREAS
`Introduction
`
`Built-up areas: a classification problem
`4.2.1 A classification approach
`4.2.2 Classification methods: a brief review
`Propagation prediction techniques
`4.3.1 Young’s measurements
`4.3.2 Allsebrook’s method
`4.3.3 The Okumura method
`4.3.4 The Ibrahim and Parsons method
`4.3.5 Lee’s model
`4.3.6 Other methods
`
`4.4
`
`Microcellular systems
`4.4.1 Microwave measurements
`4.4.2 UHF measurements
`
`References
`
`CHARACTERISATION OF MULTIPATH PHENOMENA
`Introduction
`
`The nature of multipath propagation
`Short-term fading
`‘
`5.3.1
`The scattering model
`Angle of arrival and signal spectra
`The received signal envelope
`The received signal phase
`Envelope autocorrelation and baseband power spectrum
`Level crossing rate and average fade duration
`The PDF of phase difference
`Random FM
`
`Rician fading
`Spatial correlation of field components
`5.12.1 Cross-coreelation
`
`The signal received at the base station
`5.13.1 Vertically separated antennas
`5.13.2 Horizontally separated antennas
`The magnetic field components
`Signal variability
`5.15.1 Statistics of the fast fading
`5.15.2 Statistics of the local mean
`
`5.10
`5.11
`5.12
`
`5.13
`
`53
`54
`55
`56
`57
`61
`64
`64
`66
`69
`
`72
`72
`73
`74
`75
`78
`79
`80
`83
`90
`93
`96
`98
`99
`103
`106
`
`108
`108
`110
`113
`114
`116
`120
`122
`123
`125
`130
`131
`134
`136
`138
`140
`142
`143
`145
`148
`149
`151
`
`
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`
`5.15.3 Large area statistics
`References
`
`WIDEBAND CHANNEL CHARACTERISATION
`Introduction
`
`Frequency-selective fading
`6.2.1 Channel characterisation
`Characterisation of deterministic channels
`6.3.1 Time-domain function
`
`6.3.2 Frequency-domain function
`6.3.3 Time-variant transfer function
`6.3.4 Delay/Doppler-spread function
`6.3.5 Relationships between system functions in different domains
`Characterisation of randomly time-variant linear channels
`6.4.1 Channel correlation functions
`
`6.4.2 Relationships between channel correlation functions
`Classification of practical channels
`6.5.1 The wide-sense stationary channel
`6.5.2 The uncorrelated scattering channel
`6.5.3 The wide—sense stationary uncorrelated scattering channel
`Channel characterisation using the scattering function
`6.6.1 The point-scatterer description
`6.6.2 Statistical point-scatterer model
`6.6.3 The scattering function
`Mobile radio channel characterisation
`6.7.1
`Small-scale channel characterisation
`
`6.4
`
`6.5
`
`6.6
`
`6.7
`
`Large—scale channel characterisation
`6.7.2
`References
`
`FURTHER MOBILE RADIO CHANNELS
`Introduction
`
`Building penetration losses
`Propagation inside buildings
`7.3.1 Propagation characteristics
`7.3.2 Wideband measurements
`
`Radio propagation in tunnels
`Propagation in rural areas
`7.5.1
`Introduction
`
`75.2 Signal statistics
`7.5.3 Comparison of various distributions to model the small-scale
`signal variations
`References
`
`SOUNDING, SAMPLING AND SIMULATION
`Channel sounding
`Narrowband channel-sounding techniques
`Signal sampling
`Sampled distributions
`8.4.1
`Sampling to obtain the local mean value
`8.4.2 Sampling 3 Rayleigh-distributed variable
`
`ix
`
`153
`159
`
`161
`161
`162
`164
`165
`165
`166
`167
`168
`168
`169
`170
`171
`172
`172
`173
`175
`176
`176
`178
`179
`182
`183
`187
`188
`
`189
`189
`190
`194
`195
`197
`200
`201
`201
`203
`
`206
`209
`
`212
`212
`212
`214
`215
`216
`217
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`8.5
`
`8.6
`8.7
`8.8
`
`8.9
`
`8.10
`
`Mean signal strength
`8.5.1 Confidence interval
`Normalisation revisited
`
`Wideband channel sounding
`Wideband sounding techniques
`8.8.1
`Periodic pulse sounding method
`8.8.2 Pulse compression techniques
`8.8.3 Convolution matched-filter technique
`8.8.4 The swept time—delay cross-correlation method
`System requirements
`8.9.1 Dynamic range
`8.9.2 Multipath resolution
`8.9.3 Scaling factor for the STDCC
`8.9.4 Doppler-shift resolution
`8.9.5 Accuracy of frequency standards
`8.9.6 Phase noise in signal sources
`8.9.7
`Improved sounder design
`Experimental data processing
`8.10.1 Frequency-domain characterisation
`8.10.2 Large-scale characterisation
`8.10.3 Summary
`Radio channel simulation
`Hardware simulation of narrowband channels
`Wideband channels
`8.13.1 Software simulation
`8.13.2 Hardware simulation
`
`References
`
`MAN-MADE NOISE AND INTERFERENCE
`Introduction
`
`The Nature of impulsive noise
`Characterisation of pulses
`9.3.1 The spectrum amplitude of a rectangular pulse
`9.3.2
`Impulse generators
`Characterisation of impulsive noise
`9.4.1 Measurement parameters
`Measuring equipment
`9.5.1 Bandwidth considerations
`
`9.5.2 Dynamic range considerations
`9.5.3 Receiver sensitivity and noise figure considerations
`9.5.4
`Impulse response considerations
`Practical measuring systems
`Measurement of noise amplitude distribution
`Statistical characterisation of noise
`
`Impulsive noise measurements
`9.9.1 Measurements using NAD
`9.9.2 Measurements using APD
`Discussion
`
`Prediction of performance degradation
`
`9.6
`9.7
`9.8
`9.9
`
`9.10
`9.11
`
`217
`218
`220
`221
`223
`223
`224
`225
`226
`229
`230
`230
`230
`231
`231
`232
`233
`235
`236
`237
`237
`238
`239
`243
`243
`247
`252
`
`255
`255
`257
`258
`258
`259
`260
`260
`266
`266
`266
`267
`268
`269
`273
`273
`275
`276
`277
`289
`291
`
`

`

`’i
`
`lntrsénetion
`
`1.1 BACKGROUND
`
`to the origins of
`The history of mobile radio goes back almost
`radiocommunication itself. The very early work of Hertz in the 1880’s showed
`that electromagnetic wave propagation was possible in free space and hence
`demonstrated the practicality of radiocommunications. In 1892, less than 5
`years later, a paper written by the British scientist Sir William Crookes [I]
`predicted telegraphic communication over
`long distances using tuned
`receiving and transmitting apparatus and this early work was soon turned
`into the first practical communication system by the entrepreneur Marconi
`[2]. He established a radio link over a distance of a few miles in 1895 using
`two elevated antennas and progress was such that only two years later, he
`succeeded in communicating from The Needles, Isle of Wight, to a tugboat
`over a distance of some 18 miles. Although it seems highly unlikely that
`Marconi thought of this experiment in terms of mobile radio, mobile radio
`it certainly was!
`Nowadays the term mobile radio is deemed to embrace almost any
`situation where the transmitter or receiver is capable of being moved —
`whether it actually moves or not. It therefore encompasses satellite-mobile,
`aero-mobile and maritime-mobile, as well as cordless telephones, radio
`paging, traditional private mobile radio (PMR) and cellular systems. Any
`book which attempted to cover all these areas would, of necessity, be very
`bulky and the present volume will therefore be concerned only with the latter
`categories of use which are covered by the generic term ‘Land Mobile Radio’.
`This, however, is not a book that deals with the systems and techniques that
`are used in land mobile communications, it is restricted to a discussion of
`the radio channel — the transmission medium — a vital and central feature
`which places fundamental limitations on the performance of radio systems.
`The majority of the book is concerned with the way in which the radio
`channel affects the signal that propagates through it, but there are further
`chapters, one concerned with topics such as channel sounding, channel
`simulation and signal sampling and the other devoted to characterisation of
`the noise environment.
`they can be left until
`It is not profitable, at this point, to discuss details
`later. Suflice it to say at the beginning that in the vast majority of cases,
`because of complexity and variability,
`a deterministic approach to
`establishing the parameters of the propagation channel is not feasible. Almost
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`2
`
`THE MOBILE RADIO PROPAGATION CHANNEL
`
`invariably it is necessary to resort to measurements and to the powerful tools
`of statistical communication theory. One point worth clarifying at this stage,
`however, is that signal transmission over a mobile radio path is reciprocal
`in the sense that
`the locations of the transmitter and receiver can be
`
`interchanged without changing the received signal characteristics. The
`discussion can therefore proceed on the basis of transmission in either
`direction without loss of generality. However, a word of caution is needed.
`The ambient noise levels at the two ends of the link may not be the same
`and so reciprocity with respect to the signal characteristics does not imply
`reciprocity with respect to the signal—to-noise ratio.
`If this book had been written some years ago its primary concern would
`undoubtedly have been the propagation aspects related to traditional mobile
`radio services which are based on the concept of an elevated base station,
`located on a good site, communicating with a number of mobiles in the
`surrounding area. Such systems, known as private mobile radio (PMR)
`systems, developed rapidly following World War 11, particularly so when
`after the invention of the transistor it became possible to design and build
`compact, lightweight equipment that could easily be installed in a vehicle
`and powered directly from the vehicle battery. They are often termed
`‘Dispatch Systems” because of their popularity with police forces,
`taxi
`companies and service organisations who operate fleets of vehicles. The
`frequency bands used for such systems lie in the range 70~47O MHz and have
`been chosen because the propagation characteristics are suitable, antennas
`are of a convenient size and adequate radio frequency (RF) power can be
`generated easily and efficiently. The operational strategy used is to divide
`the available spectrum into convenient channels with each user, or user
`group, having access to one or more of these channels in order to transmit
`a message, usually speech, by means of either amplitude or frequency
`modulation. The technique of providing a service to a number of users in
`this way is known as frequency division multiple access (FDMA) and because
`each channel carries only one message, the term single channel per carrier
`(SCPC) is also used. In the early post-war days, channels were spaced by
`100 kHz, but advances in technology, coupled with an ever-increasing
`demand for licences, has lead to several reductions to the point where
`currently in the UK, channels in the VHF band (30—300 MHz) are 12.5 kHz
`apart, whilst 25 kHz separation is still used for some channels in the UHF
`band (300—3000 MHZ).
`For these PMR systems, indeed, for any mobile radio system with a similar
`operating scenario, the major propagation-related factors that have to be
`taken into consideration are the effect of irregular terrain and the influence
`on the signal of trees, buildings and other natural and man-made obstacles.
`In recent years, however, expanded services have become available, for
`example radio pagers, which are now in common use. Hand-portable, rather
`than vehicle-borne equipment is also being used by security guards, policemen
`and, more recently by subscribers to cellular radio telephone systems. Such
`equipment can easily be taken into buildings, so a book concerned with
`propagation must consider additionally, the properties of the signal inside
`buildings and in the surrounding areas. For cordless telephones and the like,
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`
`3
`
`there is also a need to study propagation totally within buildings. Neither
`can we restrict attention to frequencies below 470MHz; current telepoint
`and cellular radio services operate at frequencies up to 900 MHZ, and the
`first generation of
`‘personal’ communication systems
`is
`likely to be
`developed using frequencies around 1.8GHz. In the future even higher
`frequencies will probably be used to implement microcellular schemes and
`in order to ease spectrum congestion.
`What
`then are the matters of primary concern? In connection with
`transmissions of the traditional type in which the signals are restricted to
`fairly narrow radio channels, important factors which have to be quantified
`include:
`
`(1) The median signal strength, and
`(2) The signal variability.
`
`large to be economically covered using a single base station and various
`
`The ability to predict the minimum power it is necessary to radiate from a
`given transmitter to provide an acceptable quality of coverage over a
`pre-determined service area and to estimate the likely effect of such
`transmissions on services in adjacent areas is critical in improving frequency
`re-use techniques, in implementing band-sharing schemes between different
`services and for the success of radio telephone systems. This is not easy and
`there is a vital need for a better understanding of the influence of the different
`urban and terrain factors on the mobile radio signal.
`As far as signal variability is concerned, it is often convenient to separate
`the effects, on a basis of scale, into those which occur over a short distance
`and those which are apparent only over much longer distances. The former
`category includes the rapid fading caused by multipath propagation in urban
`areas whilst the much slower variations in average signal strength as the
`receiver moves from one area to another lie in the latter category.
`For the future, digital techniques are of increasing interest and in the new
`Pan-European Cellular Radio Scheme [3] which will become operational in
`the early 1990s, digitised speech will be used. At carrier frequencies above
`lGHz, and with digital
`techniques,
`it may no longer be convenient or
`desirable to use the FDMA/SCPC systems previously described and spectrum
`efficiency may be substantially improved by allowing each user access to a
`very wide radio channel
`(perhaps several MHz) but only for a small
`percentage of the time. This strategy is known as time division multiple
`access (TDMA). The characterisation of wideband channels will be discussed
`in Chapter 6; for the present it will be sufficient to point out that if digital
`(pulse) signals propagate in an environment where more than one path exists
`between the transmitter and the receiver, then interference can occur between
`a given pulse and a delayed version of an earlier pulse (an echo) that has
`travelled via a longer path. This is known as intersymbol interference (181)
`and can cause errors. The extent of the problem can be quantified by
`propagation studies which measure parameters such as the average delay
`and the spread of delays.
`Finally, in this introductory section, it is worth making two further points.
`Firstly, the geographical service area of many mobile radio systems is too
`
`

`

`4
`
`THE MOBILE RADIO PROPAGATION CHANNEL
`
`methods exist to provide ‘area coverage’ using a number of transmitters.
`We will return to this topic in Section 1.3.2. Secondly, in order to maximise
`the use of the available spectrum, channels that are allocated to one user in
`a certain geographical area are re-allocated to a different user in another
`area some distance away. The most common example of this is cellular radio,
`which relies on frequency re—use to achieve high spectrum efficiency. However,
`whenever frequencies are reallocated, there is always the possibility that
`interference will be caused and it should therefore be understood that
`adequate reception conditions require not only an acceptable signal-to-noise
`ratio but also, simultaneously, an acceptable signal-to-interference ratio. This
`subject will be treated in Chapter 9. Throughout the book the term ‘base
`station’ will be used when referring to the fixed terminal and the term
`‘mobile’ to describe the moving terminal, whether it be hand-portable or
`installed in a vehicle.
`
`1.2 MODES 0F PROPAGATION AND THE USES OF
`DIFFERENT FREQUENCY BANDS
`
`Having set the scene for the book, we can now move on to discuss some of
`the topics in a little more detail. It is very important to understand the
`manner in which radio frequency energy propagates and in preparation for
`a brief general discussion of that topic let us define more clearly what is
`meant by the term radio wave and how waves of different frequencies are
`classified.
`The part of the electromagnetic spectrum that includes radio frequencies
`extends from about 30 kHz to 300 GHz, although radio wave propagation
`is actually possible at frequencies down to a few kHz. By international
`agreement the radio frequency spectrum is divided into ‘bands’, each band
`being given a designatory name as in Table 1.1.
`Electromagnetic energy in the form of radio waves propagates outwards
`from a transmitting antenna and there are several ways in which these waves
`travel, much depending on the transmission frequency. Waves propagated
`via the layers of the ionosphere are known as ionospheric waves or sky-waves.
`
`Table 1.1 DESIGNATION OF FREQUENCY BANDS
`————————_‘__________
`Frequency band
`Frequency range
`
`< 3 kHz
`Extremely low frequency (ELF)
`3—30 kHz
`Very low frequency (VLF)
`30—300 kHz
`Low frequency (LF)
`300 kHz—3 MHz
`Medium frequency (MP)
`3—30 MHZ
`High frequency (HF)
`30—300MHZ
`Very high frequency (VHF)
`300 MHz—3 GHZ
`Ultra high frequency (UHF)
`3-30 GHZ
`Super high frequency (SHF)
`30—300 GHz -
`Extra high frequency (EHF)
`————————________________
`
`
`
`
`E—m—Smn
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`
`5
`
`Radiowaves
`
`
`
`Ionospheric or
`sky-waves
`
`Ground anes
`
`Tropospheric waves
`
`Space waves
`
`Surface waves
`
`Direct waves
`
`Ground-reflected
`waves
`
`Fig. 1.1 Modes afradiowave propagation
`
`Those that propagate over other paths in the lower atmosphere (the
`troposphere) are termed tropospheric waves whilst those that propagate very
`close to the Earth’s surface are known by the generic term ground-waves.
`Ground waves can be conveniently divided into space waves and surface
`waves and space waves can be further sub-divided into direct waves which
`propagate via the direct path between transmitting and receiving antennas
`and ground-reflected waves that reach the receiving antenna after reflection
`from the ground. Figure 1.1 gives a simple picture. The surface waves are
`guided along the earth’s surface and because the earth is not a perfect
`conductor, energy is extracted from the wave, as it propagates, to supply
`losses in the ground itself. The attenuation of this wave (sometimes known
`as the ‘Norton surface wave’) is therefore directly affected by the ground
`constants (conductivity and dielectric constant) along the transmission path.
`The importance of each of these waves in any particular case depends upon
`the length of the propagation path and the frequency of transmission. We
`can now discuss each frequency band in turn.
`
`
`
`1.2.1 VLF
`
`In the VLF range the wavelength is very long, typically 105 m, and antennas
`are therefore very large. They are of necessity very close to the earth and
`are often actually buried in the ground. The radio waves are reflected from
`the ionosphere and a form of earth/ionosphere waveguide exists that guides
`the wave as it propagates. Because of diurnal variations in the height of the
`D-layer the effective height of the terrestrial waveguide also varies around
`
`

`

`6
`
`THE MOBILE RADIO PROPAGATION CHANNEL
`
`the surface of the earth. The uses of VLF include long distance worldwide
`telegraphy and navigation systems. Frequencies in the VLF range are also
`useful for communication with submerged submarines, as higher frequencies
`are very rapidly attenuated by conducting sea water. Digital transmissions
`are always used but the available bandwidth in this frequency range is very
`small and the data rate is therefore extremely low.
`
`1.2.2 LF and MF
`
`At frequencies in the range between a few kHz and a few MHz (the LF and
`MF bands) groundwave propagation is the dominant mode and the radiation
`characteristics are strongly influenced by the presence of the earth. At LF,
`the surface wave component of the ground wave is successfully utilised for
`long distance communication and navigation. Physically, antennas are still
`quite large and high power transmitters are used. The increased bandwidth
`available in the MF band allows it
`to be used for commercial AM
`
`broadcasting and although the attenuation of the surface wave is higher than
`in the LF band, broadcasting over distances of several hundred miles is still
`possible particularly during the daytime. At night, skywave propagation Via
`the ionospheric D-layer is possible in the MF band and this leads to the
`possibility of interference between signals arriving at a given point, one via
`a groundwave and the other via a skywave path.
`Interference can be
`constructive or destructive depending upon the phases of the incoming waves
`and temporal variations in the height of the D-layer, which are apparent
`over periods measured in tens of seconds, cause the signal to be alternatively
`strong and weak. This phenomenon, termed fading, can also be produced
`by several other mechanisms and always occurs when energy can propagate
`via more than one path. It is an important effect in Mobile Radio as will be
`seen later.
`
`1.2.3 HF
`
`Groundwave propagation also exists in the HF band, but here the ionospheric
`or skywave is often the dominant feature. For reasons which will become
`apparent later, the HF band is not used for civilian land mobile radio and
`it is therefore inappropriate to go into details of the propagation phenomena.
`Suffice it to say that the layers of ionised gases within the ionosphere (the
`so-called D, E and F layers) exist at heights up to several hundred kilometres
`above the earth’s surface and single and multiple hops via the various
`ionospheric layers permit almost worldwide communications. The height of
`the different layers varies with the time of day, the season of the year and
`the geographical
`location [4];
`this causes severe problems which have
`attracted the attention of researchers over many years and are still of great
`interest.
`
`___..___._.n_....-MV
`
`i
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`
`7
`
`1.2.4 VHF and UHF
`
`Frequencies in the VHF and UHF bands are usually too high for ionospheric
`propagation to occur and communication takes place via the direct and
`ground-reflected components of the spacewave. In these bands antennas are
`relatively small
`in physical size and can be mounted on masts several
`wavelengths above the ground. Under these conditions the spacewave is
`predominant. Although the spacewave is often a negligible factor
`in
`communication at lower frequencies, it is the dominant feature of groundwave
`communication at VHF and UHF. The bandwidth available is such that
`
`high quality FM radio and television channels can be accommodated but
`propagation is normally restricted to points within the radio horizon and
`coverage is therefore essentially local. The analysis of spacewave propagation
`at VHF and UHF needs to take into acount the problems of reflections both
`from the ground and from natural and man-made obstacles. Diffraction over
`hill tops and buildings, and refraction in the lower atmosphere are also
`important.
`
`directly relevant to current mobile radio systems. However, Fig. 1.2 shows
`
`The term millimetre wave (mm-wave) is often used to describe frequencies
`in the EHF band between 30 and 300 GHz. By comparison with lower
`frequencies, enormous bandwidths are available in this part of the spectrum.
`Line of sight propagation is now predominant and although interference
`from ground-reflected waves is possible, it is often insignificant, because the
`roughness of the ground is now much greater in comparison with the
`wavelength involved. It is only when the ground is very smooth, or a water
`surface is present, that the ground-reflected waves play a significant role.
`This topic will be treated in Chapter 2. In the min—wave band the most
`important effects that have to be taken into account are scattering by
`precipitation (rain and snow) and at certain frequencies, absorption by fog,
`water vapour and other atmospheric gases. A detailed treatment ofmm-wave
`propagation is well beyond the scope of this book and, in any case, is not
`
`1.2.5 SHF
`
`Frequencies in the SHF band are commonly termed microwaves and this
`term is sometimes used, in addition, to describe that part of the UHF band
`above about 1.5GHz. Propagation paths must have line.of.sight between
`the transmitting and receiving antennas, otherwise losses are extremely high.
`At these frequencies it is possible to design compact high-gain antennas
`normally of the reflector-type which concentrate the radiation in the required
`direction. Microwave frequencies are used for satellite communication (since
`they penetrate the ionosphere with little or no effect), point-to-point terrestrial
`links, radars and short-range communication systems.
`
`1.2.6 EHF
`
`L______ _
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`8
`
`THE MOBILE RADIO PROPAGATION CHANNEL
`
`dB/km
`
`Attenuation,
`
`3
`
`6
`
`15
`
`60
`3O
`Frequency, GHz
`
`150
`
`300
`
`Fig. 1.2 Attenuation by oxygen and water vapour at sea level. T = 20°C. Water content: 7.5 g/m3
`
`the attenuation by oxygen and uncondensed water vapour [5] as a function
`of frequency. It can be seen that at some frequencies there are strong
`absorption lines, for example the water-vapour absorption at 22 GHz and
`the oxygen absorption at 60 GHZ. However, between these lines there are
`windows where the attenuation is much less. Specialised applications such
`as very short range secure communication systems and satellite-to-satellite
`links are where mm—waves find application but the absorption bands have
`some potential for microcellular mobile communications in the future. At
`present there is no volume market in this frequencies range so component
`and system costs are very high.
`
`13 CHOICE OF OPERATENG FREQUENCY FOR MOBILE
`RADIO SYSTEMS
`
`There are several factors that have to be taken into account in deciding what
`frequency band should be used for a particular type of radio communications
`service. For the specific application of interest,
`two-way mobile radio
`operations, communication is required over ranges that do not normally
`exceed a éew tens of km — indeed it would cause unnecessary interference to
`other users if the signals propagated too far. It is also evident that if mobiles
`are to communicate freely with their base, or with each other, throughout a
`given area (which may or may not be the total service area of the system) _
`the transmitters involved must be able to provide an adequate signal strength
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`
`9
`
`over the entire area concerned. Operating frequencies must be chosen in a
`region of the RF spectrum where it is possible to design efficient antennas
`of a size suitable for mounting on base station masts, on vehicles, and on
`hand-portable equipment. Since the mobiles can move around freely within
`the area covered by the radio system, their exact location is unknown and
`the antennas must therefore radiate energy uniformly in all directions in the
`horizontal (azimuth) plane - technically this is known as ‘omni-directional’
`radiation*. It is also vital that the frequencies chosen are such that the
`transmitters used at base stations and mobiles can generate the necessary
`RF power whilst remaining fairly small in physical size.
`For two-way mobile radio, particularly in urban areas, it is seldom that the
`mobile antenna has a direct line-of-sight path to the base station. Radio
`waves will penetrate into buildings to a limited extent and, because of
`diffraction, appear to bend slightly over minor undulations or folds in the
`ground. Fortunately, due to multiple scattering and reflection, the waves
`also propagate into built up areas, and although the signal strength is
`substantially reduced by all these various effects, sensitive receivers are able
`to detect the signals even in heavily built-up areas and within buildings. The
`choice of frequency is therefore limited by the need to minimise the losses
`due to buildings whilst continuing to satisfy the other constraints mentioned
`above.
`
`For these reasons, traditional two-way mobile radio has developed almost
`exclusively around the VHF and latterly UHF bands. In a city, for example,
`there are many mobile radio users such as emergency services, taxi companies
`and the like. The central police control room receives reports of incidents
`in the city area — often by emergency telephone calls. The control room radio
`operator puts out a call to a police officer, believed to be in the appropriate
`area, who may be on foot with a personal radio, or in a vehicle equipped
`with mobile radio. On receipt of the call
`the officer acknowledges it,
`investigates the incident and reports back by radio. Because of the
`FDMA/SCPC method of operation, police forces have radio channels
`exclusively allocated for their use and there is no mutual interference between
`them and other users such as taxis who have been allocated different channels
`in the same frequency band. All police oflicers on duty, however, who carry
`a receiver tuned to the appropriate frequency will hear the calls as they are
`broadcast.
`
`The range over which signals propagate is also a fundamental consideration
`since in order to use the available spectrum efficiently,
`it is necessary to
`re-allocate radio channels to other users operating some distance away. If
`in the example given above the message had been radiated on HF, then it
`is possible that the signals could have been detected at distances of several
`hundred km, which is unnecessary, undesirable and in any case, would cause
`interference to other users. The VHF and UHF bands therefore represent
`an optimum choice for mobile radio because of their relatively short-range
`propagation characteristics and because radio equipment designed for these
`bands is reasonably compact and inexpensive. Vertical polarisation is always
`
`* Omni-directional is not to be confused with isotropic, which means “in all directions’.
`
`.W3Z'Q’A’”
`
`,...,.,._,...-p...-.__4,..._mflm
`
`-—«-—~-..-...-u'.
`
`

`

`l
`
`
`
`10
`
`THE MOBILE RADIO PROPAGATION CHANNEL
`
`used for mobile communications. At frequencies in the VHF band it is better
`than horizontal polarisation because it produces a higher field strength near
`the ground [6]. Furthermore, mobile and hand-portable antennas for vertical
`polarisation are more robust and more convenient to use. In an overall plan
`for frequency re-use, no worthwhile improvement can be achieved by
`employing both polarisations (as used in television broadcasting) because
`scattering in urban areas tends to cause a cross-polar component to appear.
`Although this may have some advantages, for example it is often inconvenient
`to hold the antenna of a hand-portable radio telephone in a truly vertical
`position,
`it
`is apparent
`that no general benefit would result from the
`transmission of horizontally polarised signals.
`There are many other services, however, which also operate in the VHF
`and UHF bands for example, television, domestic radio, citizens-band radio,
`marine radio, aero-mobile radio (including instrument lan

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket