throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 60
`Entered: July 31, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ASPHALT PRODUCTS UNLIMITED, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BLACKLIDGE EMULSIONS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Cases IPR2017-01241 and -01242
`Patents 7,503,724 B2 and 7,918,624 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY and TIMOTHY J. GOODSON,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WEATHERLY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`Inter partes reviews IPR2017-01241 and -01242 were instituted on
`
`October 24, 2017. IPR2017-01241, Paper 23; IPR2017-01242, Paper 23. A
`
`Scheduling Order was issued on the same day, which set the date for oral
`
`hearing to August 8, 2018, if hearing were requested by the parties and
`
`granted by the Board. IPR2017-01241, Paper 24; IPR2017-01242, Paper 24.
`
`Both parties have requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01241 and -01242
`Patent 7,503,724 B2 and 7,918,624 B2
`
`IPR2017-01241, Papers 58, 59; IPR2017-01242, Papers 60, 61. Petitioner’s
`
`and Patent Owner’s requests for oral hearing are granted. Although these
`
`cases are not consolidated, the hearing for the cases will be held together and
`
`a single transcript will be provided for both cases.
`
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 p.m. EDT, on August 8, 2018, on
`
`the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`
`Virginia. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`
`Each party will have one hour to present arguments. Petitioner bears
`
`the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s claims at issue in these
`
`proceedings are unpatentable. Patent Owner has filed a motion to amend.
`
`IPR2017-01241, Paper 33; IPR2017-01242, Paper 33. Petitioner will open
`
`the hearing by presenting its case regarding the patentability of any claim at
`
`issue in the proceedings including original claims and any claims proposed
`
`in Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend. Patent Owner will then respond to
`
`Petitioner’s argument and also argue in support of its motion to amend
`
`claims. Petitioner may reserve time to respond to arguments presented by
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding are not evidence and are
`
`intended only to assist the parties in presenting their oral argument to the
`
`panel. Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits shall be served
`
`on opposing counsel at least seven (7) business days before the oral hearing,
`
`and filed as an exhibit no later than the time of the oral hearing. The parties
`
`also shall provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01241 and -01242
`Patent 7,503,724 B2 and 7,918,624 B2
`
`Board at least three (3) business days prior to the oral hearing by emailing
`
`the exhibits to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties are directed to St. Jude
`
`Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University
`
`of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27, 2015) (Paper 65), for
`
`guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits, which
`
`must include citations to the record.
`
`If either party objects to demonstrative exhibits, the parties shall meet
`
`and confer in good faith to resolve any such objections. A party may file a
`
`paper addressing any unresolved objections to demonstrative exhibits with
`
`the Board no later than three (3) business days before the oral hearing. The
`
`paper shall include a single sentence per objection stating the basis for that
`
`objection and be accompanied by a copy of the allegedly objectionable
`
`demonstrative exhibit that identifies the objectionable portion of the exhibit
`
`with particularity. No further argument or explanation is permitted. We will
`
`consider the objections and, if we deem it necessary, we will further address
`
`the objections in a conference call or at the oral hearing. Otherwise, we will
`
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral hearing.
`
`Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made no later than
`
`five (5) days in advance of the hearing date via email to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`If the request is not received timely, the equipment may not be available on
`
`the day of the hearing.
`
`We expect lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the
`
`oral hearing. However, lead or backup counsel may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`
`attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01241 and -01242
`Patent 7,503,724 B2 and 7,918,624 B2
`
`conference with the panel no later than two (2) business days prior to the
`
`oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01241 and -01242
`Patent 7,503,724 B2 and 7,918,624 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert Waddell
`Michael K. Leachman
`JONES WALKER LLP
`rwaddell@joneswalker.com
`mleachman@joneswalker.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`John F. Triggs
`Ryan D. Levy
`Seth R. Odgen
`William E. Seyki
`PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.
`jft@iplawgroup.com
`rdl@iplawgroup.com
`sro@iplawgroup.com
`wes@iplawgroup.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket