throbber
21657
`Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 79/Monday, April 24, 2000/Rules and Regulations
`
`TABLE 1.—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES—Continued
`
`Facility
`
`Address
`
`Waste description
`
`(A) Provide a one-time written notification to any State Regulatory Agency to which or through which
`they will transport the delisted waste described above for disposal, 60 days before beginning such ac-
`(8)Update the one-time written notification if they ship the delisted waste into a different disposal facil-
`ity.
`
`TABLE 2.—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES
`
`
`Facility
`Address
`Waste description
`
`DuraTherm, In-
`corporated.
`
`San Leon, Texas Desorber Solids,
`(at a maximum generation of 20,000 cubic yards per calendar year) generated by
`DuraTherm using the treatment process to treat the Desorber solids,
`(EPA Hazardous Waste No.
`K048, K049, KO50, and KO51 and disposed of in a subtitle D landfill.
`DuraTherm must implement the testing program found in Table 1. Wastes Excluded From Non-Specific
`Sources, for the petition to be valid.
`*
`*
`*
`
`[FR Doc. 00-10038 Filed 4—21-00; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
`
`
`FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
`COMMISSION
`
`47 CFR PART 11
`
`[DA 00-755]
`
`Emergency Alert System
`AGENCY: [’ederal Communications
`Commission.
`ACTION: Final rule.
`
`SUMMARY: This documentrevises part 11
`of the Commission’s rules governing the
`Emergency Alert System (EAS) to
`remove certain rule provisions which
`are obsolete and to make minoreditorial
`revisions.
`
`DATES: Liffective April 24, 2000.
`FOR FURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT:
`Kathy Berthot, Enforcement Bureau,
`Technical and Public Safely Division,
`(202) 418-1454.
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: Thisis a
`summaryof the Order of the
`Commission’s Managing Director, DA
`00-755, adopted on March 31, 2000,
`and released on April 4, 2000. The
`complete text of this Orderis available
`for inspection and copying during
`normal business hours in the FCC
`Reference Information Center, Courtyard
`Level, 445 12th Strect, SW, Washington,
`D.C., and also may be purchased from
`the Commission’s copycontractor,
`International Transcription Services,
`Inc., at 202-857-3800, CY—B400, 445
`12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C.
`
`The Order amendspart 11 to remove
`references to the EAS authenticatorlists,
`which have been discontinued bythe
`Commission. The EAS authenticator
`lists were lists of words distributed
`annually by the Commission to the
`White House Communications Agency
`(WHCA), the Federal Emergency
`Management Agency (FEMA), and all
`EASparticipants. The lists were used by
`EASparticipants to authenticate
`national-levcl EAS messages prior to
`activation of the EAS, The Commission
`discontinucd the EAS authenticatorlists
`in 1998, after consultation with FEMA
`and WHCA,because the new EAS
`equipment which must be used by
`broadcast stations and cable operators
`can process EAS messages automatically
`wilboul Lhe need for human
`intervention and aulhenticalion.
`Addilionally, the Order removes
`references lo the required weekly lesls
`of the old Emergency Broadcast System
`Attention Signal from the part 11 rules
`because, effective January 1, 1997,
`broadcast stations are no longer required
`to conduct those tests. Furthermore, the
`Order makes minoreditorial revisions to
`the part 11 rulesto reflect the shift of
`responsibility for the EAS from the
`Commission’s Compliance and
`Information Bureau, which has been
`eliminated, lo the recently established
`Enforcement Bureau.
`As the Order merely removes obsolete
`tule provisions and makes minor
`cditorial revisionsto the rules, the
`Commission finds good cause to
`concludethat notice and comment
`procedures are unnecessary. 5 U.S.C.
`553(b)(3)(B). Since a general notice of
`proposed rulemakingis not required,
`
`
`
`
`
`the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not
`apply.
`The actions taken in the Order have
`been analyzed with respect to the
`Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
`found lo impose no newor modified
`reporting and recordkeeping
`requirements or burdens on the public.
`List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 11
`Radio, ‘'clevision.
`Federal Communications Commission.
`
`AndrewS. Fishel,
`Managing Director.
`
`Rule Changes
`For the reasons discussed in the
`preamble, the 'ederal Communications
`Commission amends47 CFRpart 11 as
`follows:
`
`PART 11—EMERGENCY ALERT
`SYSTEM (EAS)
`
`1. The aulhorily cilalion for Part 11
`continues to read as follows:
`
`Authority: 47 1J.S.C. 151, 154(i) and (0),
`303(r), 544(g) and 606.
`§11.11
`[Amended]
`
`2. Section 11.11 is amended by
`removing foolnoles 4 and 5 in the
`Timetable for Broadcast Stalions.
`
`§11.17 [Removed]
`3. Seclian 11.17 is removed.
`
`4. Seclion 11.21 is amendedby
`revising the introductory text to read as
`follows:
`
`IBM EX. 1011
`IBM EX. 1011
`
`1 of 2
`1 of 2
`
`
`
`

`

`21658
`Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 79/Monday, April 24, 2000/ Rules and Regulations
`
`§11.21 State and local area plans and FCC
`mapbook.
`EASplans contain guidelines which
`must be followed bybroadcast and cable
`personnel, emergencyofficials and
`National Weather Service (NWS)
`personnelto activate the EAS, The plans
`include the EAS headercodes and
`messages that will be transmitted by key
`EAS sources (NP, LP, SP and SR), State
`and local plans contain unique methods
`of EAS message distribution such as the
`usc of RBDS. The plans must be
`reviewed and approved bythe Chief,
`Technical and Public Safety Division,
`Enforcement Bureau,prior to
`implementalion lo ensure thal they are
`consistent with national plans, FCC
`regulations, and EAS opcration.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`5. Section 11.41 is amended by
`revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
`§11.41 Participation in EAS.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`(c) All sources, including NN, must
`have immediate access to an Operating
`Handbook.''hey should contact the FCC
`lo ensure thal they are on lhe FCC EAS
`mailinglist.
`6. Section 11.47 is amended by
`revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
`§11.47 Optional use of other
`communications methods and systems.
`*
`x
`*
`x
`*
`
`(b) Other technologies and public
`service providers, such as DBS, low
`earth orbiting satellites, etc., that wish
`to participate in the EAS maycontact
`the FCC’s ‘l’echnical and Public Safety
`Division, Enforcement Bureau,or their
`State Emergency Communications
`Committee for information and
`guidance.
`§11.54 [Amended]
`
`7, Section 11.54 is amended by
`removing paragraph (b)(2) and
`redesignating paragraphs (b)(3) through
`(b)(15) as paragraphs(b)(2) through
`(b)(14).
`8, Section 11.55 is amended by
`revising paragraph (c)(4) to read as
`follows:
`
`§11.55 EASoperation during a State or
`Local Area emergency.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`*
`ke
`*
`Cc
`(4) Broadcaststations, cable systems
`and wireless cable systemsparticipating
`in the State or Local Area EAS must
`discontinue normal programming and
`follow the procedures in the State and
`Local arca plans. Television stations
`must comply with § 11.54(b)(6) and
`cable systems and wireless cable
`systems must comply with § 11.54(b)(7).
`
`Broadcast stations providing foreign
`language programmingshall comply
`with § 11.54(b)(8).
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`9. Section 11,61 is amended by
`removing paragraph(a)(2)(i),
`redesignating paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)
`through(a)(2)(v) as (a)(2)(i) through
`(a)(2)(iv), and revising paragraph (a)(6)
`to read as follows:
`
`§11.61 Tests of EAS procedures.
`
`(a) eK OK
`(6) EAS aclivalions and special lests,
`The EAS maybe activated for
`emergencies or special tests at the State
`or Local Area level by a broadcast
`station, cable system or wireless cable
`system instead of the monthly or weekly
`tests required by this section. To
`substitute for a monthlytest, activation
`must include transmission of the EAS
`headercodes, Attention Signal,
`emergency message and EOM code and
`comply with the visual message
`requirements in § 11.51. To substitute
`for the weekly test of the EAS header
`codes and EOM codesin paragraph
`(a)(2)() of this section, activation must
`include transmission of the EAS header
`and EOM codes. 'l'elevisionstations and
`cable systems and wireless cable
`systems shall complywith the aural and
`visual message requirements in § 11.51.
`Special EAStests at the State and Local
`Area levels may be conducted on a daily
`basis following procedures in State and
`Local Area EAS plans.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`10. Section 11.62 is amended by
`revising paragraphs (d) and (e)(2) to read
`as follows:
`
`§11.62 Closed circuit tests of national
`level EASfacilities.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`(d) Test announcements will originate
`from a point selected by the White
`House with program feed circuitry
`connected to the telephone company
`Toll Test Center al points coordinaled
`for eachtest. Participating common
`carricrs will connect, as required, the
`facilities of the radio networks and other
`test participants. Telephone companies
`are not authorized to add any
`parlicipaling independent broadcasl
`stations unless authorized by the FCC.
`Authentication will be provided to the
`Toll Test Center or other program entry
`location responsible for test
`arrangements.
`(e) wk
`eK
`OK
`(2) Recipients immediately monitor
`their radio network, andif participating,
`their television network or cable system,
`
`and checktheir wire service for the
`receipt of the CCT Activation Message.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`[FR Doc. 00—10092 Filed 4—21—00; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`National Oceanic and Atmospheric
`Administration
`
`50 CFR Part 648
`
`[Docket No. 000407096-0096-01; I.D.
`040300C]
`RIN 0648-AN51
`
`Fisheries of the Northeastern United
`States; Northeast Multispecies
`Fishery; Framework Adjustment33 to
`the Northeast Multispecies Fishery
`ManagementPlan
`AGENCY: National Marine Fishcrics
`Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
`Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
`Commerce.
`
`
`
`ACTION: Final rule and 2000 targettotal
`allowable catch (TAC) levels.
`SUMMARY: NMFSissucsthis final rule to
`establish 2000 target TACs for five
`Northeast multispecies fisheries and to
`implement measures contained in
`Framework Adjustment 33 of the
`Northeast Multispecies Fishery
`Management Plan (FMP). This final rule
`implements management measuresthat
`include the following:
`A continuation ofthe current Gulfof
`Maine (GOM)codtrip limit and the
`current GOM area closures;
`Twoconditional 1-month closed areas
`portions of Massachusctts Bay and
`Stellwagen Bank in January and Cashes
`Ledge in November), which would
`becomeeffective if preliminary landings
`hrough July 31, 2000, indicate that
`more than 1.67 million Ib (759 ml) of
`GOM codhave been landed;
`A 1-year extension of the Western
`GOMyear-round closure, which
`otherwise would expire on April 30,
`2001;
`The closure of a portion of Georges
`Bank(GB) cast and southeast of Cape
`Cod during Mayto vessels fishing for
`multispecies and the removal of a
`regulatory provision that gave the
`Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS
`(Regional Administrator), the authority
`to reducc the GB codtrip limit:
`A continuation ofthe GB cod landing
`limit;
`A haddockdaily landing limit of
`3,000 lb/days at sca (DAS) (1,360.8 kg/
`DAS) with a maximum possession limit
`of 30,000 lb (13,608 kg) per trip with
`potential increases in landing limits;
`
`2 of 2
`2 of 2
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket