`
`Paper No. 50
`Entered: September 5, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01263
`Patent 6,996,461 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KRISTEN L. DROESCH, MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, and
`TIMOTHY J. GOODSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GOODSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Limit Petition
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01263
`Patent 6,996,461 B2
`
`
`
`The Petition in this case asserted three proposed grounds of
`unpatentability:
`
`
`
`References
`
`Basis
`
`Claims Challenged
`
`1. Petit1 and Blesener2
`
`2. RSAC3 and Blesener
`
`§ 103 1, 4–6, 14, 16, 17, 19, 28, 32, 35,
`42–44, and 48
`
`§ 103 1, 4–6, 14, 16, 17, 19, 28, 32, 35,
`42–44, and 48
`
`3. RSAC, Blesener, and Petit § 103 1, 4–6, 14, 16, 17, 19, 28, 32, 35,
`42–44, and 48
`
`See Paper 2, 11.
`In our initial Decision on Institution, we instituted an inter partes
`review as to only a subset of the challenged claims based on the combination
`of Ground 3, and denied institution on the challenges of Grounds 1 and 2.
`Paper 10, 35. Subsequently, pursuant to the holding in SAS Inst., Inc. v.
`Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348, 1355–57 (2018), we modified our institution decision
`to institute on all of the challenged claims and all of the grounds presented in
`the Petition. Paper 21, 2. We also authorized supplemental briefing to
`permit the parties to address the additional grounds. Paper 23, 3–6.
`Based on the parties’ statements in briefing and at the oral argument,
`we authorized the parties to file a Joint Motion to Limit the Petition to
`withdraw Ground 2 from consideration. See Paper 48. The parties timely
`
`
`1 U.S. Patent No. 5,092,544, issued Mar. 3, 1992, Ex. 1008.
`2 Int’l Pub. No. WO 02/091013 A2, published Nov. 14, 2002, Ex. 1007.
`3 Railroad Safety Advisory Committee, Implementation of Positive Train
`Control Systems, Ex. 1005.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01263
`Patent 6,996,461 B2
`
`
`filed a Joint Motion to Limit the Petition, requesting withdrawal of Ground 2
`from consideration in this proceeding. Paper 50. After considering the Joint
`Motion, we grant the request.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Limit the Petition is
`granted.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01263
`Patent 6,996,461 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jason A. Engel
`Alan L. Barry
`Benjamin E. Weed
`Erik J. Halverson
`K&L GATES LLP
`jason.engel.ptab@klgates.com
`al.barry@klgates.com
`benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com
`erik.halverson@klgates.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Jeffrey D. Sanok
`Mark M. Supko
`Vincent J. Galluzzo
`Jacob Z. Zambrzycki
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`jsanok@crowell.com
`msupko@crowell.com
`vgalluzzo@crowell.com
`jzambrzycki@crowell.com
`
`
`4
`
`