`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 53
`Entered: October 24, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FUJIFILM CORPORATION
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01268
`Patent 7,029,774 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KOKOSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01268
`Patent 7,029,774 B1
`
`
`On October 23, 2018, we entered a Final Written Decision in this
`
`proceeding finding that Petitioner has demonstrated, by a preponderance of
`
`the evidence, that claims 15 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,029,774 B1
`
`(“the ’774 patent,” Ex. 1001) are unpatentable as anticipated by Ishikawa1,
`
`but has not demonstrated that claims 1–11 and 15–20 of the ’774 patent are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over Aonuma2 or the combined teachings of
`
`Aonuma and Abe3. Paper 52 (“Decision”). The Decision discusses or cites
`
`information that may be confidential to Petitioner. See Paper 50.
`
`Accordingly, we have entered the Final Written Decision in the Board’s E2E
`
`system as “Board and Parties Only” to afford the parties an opportunity to
`
`identify any confidential information to which we have referred in the
`
`Decision.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner are to file jointly, within ten (10)
`
`business days of the entry of this Order, a Notice identifying any
`
`confidential information mentioned in the Decision, or, in the alternative,
`
`stating that the Decision does not contain any confidential information. If
`
`any confidential information is identified, Petitioner and Patent Owner are to
`
`file jointly a proposed redacted Decision with their joint Notice.
`
`We remind the parties that documents in a proceeding may be made
`
`available to the public. 37 C.F.R. § 42.14. The parties may move to
`
`
`1 U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. US 2003/0054203 A1, published
`March 20, 2003 (Ex. 1015).
`2 Japanese Patent App. Pub. No. P2003-36520A, published Feb. 7, 2003
`(Ex. 1017).
`3 European Patent App. Pub. No. 0 494 793 A1, published July 15, 1992
`(Ex. 1013).
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01268
`Patent 7,029,774 B1
`
`expunge confidential information from the record after final judgment.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56.
`
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that, within ten (10) business days of the entry of this
`
`Order, Petitioner and Patent Owner are to file jointly a Notice that either
`
`(1) identifies any confidential information that is mentioned in the Final
`
`Written Decision in this proceeding, or (2) states that the Decision does not
`
`contain any confidential information; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, if any confidential information is
`
`identified by the parties as being mentioned in the Final Written Decision,
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner are to file jointly a proposed redacted Final
`
`Written Decision with their joint Notice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01268
`Patent 7,029,774 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`Robert C. Scheinfeld
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`eliot.williams@bakerbotts.com
`robert.scheinfeld@bakerbotts.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Matthew A. Smith
`Andrew S. Baluch
`SMITH BALUCH LLP
`smith@smithbaluch.com
`baluch@smithbaluch.com
`
`Zhuanjia Gu
`TURNER BOYD
`gu@turnerboyd.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
