`571–272–7822
`
`Paper 26
`Entered: July 18, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., NICOR INC.,
`and AMAX LIGHTING,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01280 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01285 (Patent 8,672,518 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01287 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)1,2
`____________
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, PATRICK M. BOUCHER, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order pertains to all of these cases. Therefore, we exercise our
`discretion to issue a single Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`2 IPR2018-00261 and IPR2018-00271 are joined with IPR2017-01280,
`IPR2018-00262 and IPR2018-00270 are joined with IPR2017-01285, and
`IPR2018-00263 and IPR2018-00269 are joined with IPR2017-1287.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01280 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`IPR2017-01285 (Patent 8,672,518 B2)
`IPR2017-01287 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)
`
`
`Further to our trial hearing order of June 26, 2018, in proceedings
`IPR2017-01280, IPR2017-01285, and IPR2017-01287, we supplement that
`order as follows.
`Additional Petitioners, namely Jiawei Technology (HK) Ltd., Jiawei
`Technology (USA) Ltd., and Shenzhen Jiawei Photovoltaic Lighting Co.,
`Ltd. (collectively, “Jiawei”) and Leedarson Lighting Co., Ltd., and
`Leedarson America, Inc. (collectively, “Leedarson”), requested “permission
`to attend the oral argument by phone in their roles as understudies.”
`Papers 23 (IPR2017-01280); 25 (IPR2017-01285); 21 (IPR2017-01287).
`We neglected to respond that those portions of the requests for oral
`argument and we do so now. The request by the “understudy” Petitioners to
`attend the consolidated oral hearing by phone is granted. All other aspects
`of the June 26, 2018 trial hearing order remain in effect.
`For the reasons given, it is
`ORDERED that Jiawei and Leedarson’s request to attend the
`consolidated oral hearing by phone is granted.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01280 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`IPR2017-01285 (Patent 8,672,518 B2)
`IPR2017-01287 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)
`
`PETITIONER (TCP):
`Jason G. Harp
`Steven H. Noll
`Thomas A. Rammer
`Stacie Hartman (admitted pro hac vice)
`SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
`jharp@schiffhardin.com
`snoll@schiffhardin.com
`trammer@schiffhardin.com
`shartman@schiffhardin.com
`
`PETITIONER (Jiawei):
`Mark C. Nelson
`Daniel Valenzuela
`BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
`mnelson@btlaw.com
`dvalenzuela@btlaw.com
`
`PETITIONER(Leedarson):
`Jeffery Johnson
`Don Daybell
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`3J6PTABDocket@orrick.com
`D2DPTABDocket@orrick.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Eric D. Hayes
`Garret A. Leach
`Eugene Goryunov
`Kyle M. Kantarek
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`eric.hayes@kirkland.com
`garret.leach@kirkland.com
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
