throbber
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 30:245-248 (1 993)
`
`Preliminary Reports
`
`work in progress
`
`Retrieval of Undeployed Stents
`From the Right Coronary Artery:
`Report of Two Cases
`Frank L.M.J. Veldhuijzen, CT,
`Hans J.R.M. Bonnier, MD, H. Rolf Michels, MD,
`Mamdouh I.H. El Gamal, MD, and
`Berry M. van Gelder, BE
`
`Two patients are described in whom an undeployed stent (1
`Wiktor and 1 Palmaz-Schatz) was retained in the proximal seg-
`ment of the right coronary artery during coronary angioplasty.
`In both cases the stent was caught by a technique using a
`second guidewire. The stent was removed in the first patient
`during bypass surgery; in the second patient it was removed
`from the femoral sheath. Q im wiley-u-.
`Inc.
`
`Key words: angioplasty, complication, stent
`
`INTRODUCTION
`One of the major acute complications of coronary an-
`gioplasty is coronary dissection followed by impairment
`of coronary flow and subsequent acute closure. Devel-
`opment of intracoronary stents has proven to be a means
`of alleviating acute or threatened ischemia caused by
`antecedent coronary dissection [ 13.
`Although the success rate of stent placement is rela-
`tively high, it is associated with a minor percentage of
`complications, e.g., bleeding, unsuccessful stent deploy-
`ment, and loss of stents (systemic embolization), usually
`without apparent clinical sequelae [2].
`Unlike stents lost in the systemic circulation, unde-
`ployed stents in the coronary arteries should be removed
`immediately. Bypass surgery of course is one option but
`recently we developed a technique for retrieving unde-
`ployed stents from the coronary circulation that can prob-
`ably avoid surgical intervention.
`
`From the Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven,
`The Netherlands.
`
`Received March 15, 1993; revision accepted July 9, 1993.
`
`Address reprint requests to Frank Veldhuijzen, Department of Cardi-
`ology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven,
`The Netherlands.
`
`0 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`PATIENT 1
`A 61-year-old female underwent angioplasty for a 90%
`stenosis (type B lesion) in the midsegment of the right
`coronary artery. The right coronary artery was intubated
`with a right Judkins 4 cm guiding catheter. The lesion
`was crossed with a 0.014” high torque floppy guidewire
`(Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, ACS) and subse-
`quently dilated with a 2.5 mm ACX I1 balloon (ACS).
`The balloon was inflated three times for periods ranging
`from 30 to 60 sec.
`Inflation pressure was 6-7 atm. Control angiogram
`after dilatation showed a longitudinal dissection at the
`site of the lesion. A fourth inflation with a pressure of 7
`atm. was performed for a period of 90 sec without im-
`provement. Because of impairment of coronary flow it
`was decided to implant a Palmaz-Schatz stent. Medica-
`tion was started according to the protocol.
`The 2.5 mm dilatation balloon was removed-using
`a
`DOC extension wire-while
`the guidewire was kept in
`position in the right coronary artery. A Palmaz-Schatz
`stent was mounted on a 3.0 mm ACX I1 balloon and
`advanced into the guiding catheter. After entering the
`proximal segment of the right coronary artery it was
`impossible to advance the balloon to the dissected area.
`The balloon was withdrawn into the guiding catheter and
`during this maneuver, the stent slipped off the balloon
`and remained in the proximal segment of the right cor-
`onary artery. The balloon was removed from the guiding
`catheter, while the guidewire was kept in place. A sec-
`ond guidewire (0.014” high torque standard, ACS) was
`inserted into the guiding catheter and advanced into the
`right coronary artery across the stent and the dilated seg-
`ment. Both ends of the guidewires were fixed in a
`torquer device, which was rotated approximately 15
`times, until movement and twisting of the wires was
`observed inside the coronary artery.
`We then tried to pull on the wires; it appeared that the
`stent was caught by both twisted wires because a strong
`resistance was felt; but traction with moderate force was
`unsuccessful in removing wires and stent. Forceful pull-
`ing was avoided because we feared perforation of the
`proximal right coronary artery segment. The patient was
`transferred to the operation room for emergency bypass
`surgery. After opening the ascending aorta both wires
`were visible and a gentle pull by the surgeon was enough
`to remove the stent and the wires from the right coronary
`artery without any sign of perforation (Fig. 1). Bypass
`
`Petitioner Edwards Lifesciences Corporation - Exhibit 1018 - Page 1
`
`

`

`246
`
`Veldhuijzen et al.
`
`Fig. 1. Palmaz-Schatz stent caught by two guidewires and re-
`moved during bypass surgery.
`
`surgery for the right coronary artery was performed with-
`out further complications.
`
`Fig. 2. Angiogram of the right coronary artery (patient 2), left
`anterior oblique position, showing a 70% lesion with dissection
`(arrow) in the midsegment.
`
`guidewires the stent was removed from the coronary ar-
`tery (Fig. 5). Removal from the sheath was performed
`without any problem.
`Angiography revealed a patent vessel without any vis-
`ible damage at the site of stent removal. Because flow
`was unimpaired in the right coronary artery no further
`intervention was required.
`
`PATIENT 2
`A 52-year-old male underwent repeat angioplasty of a
`lesion in the mid-segment of the right coronary artery.
`There was a 70% stenosis associated with a dissection
`from the previous PTCA (Fig. 2). Because of restenosis
`and residual dissection it was decided to implant primar-
`ily a Wiktor (Medtronic, Inc.) stent. The right coronary
`artery wiis intubated with an 8F right Judkins 4 cm guid-
`ing catheter. A 0.014” high torque floppy guidewire (Ad-
`vanced Cardiocascular Systems) crossed the lesion with
`difficulty. The balloon mounted stent could not be ad-
`vanced beyond the proximal segment of the right coro-
`nary artery. During an attempt to withdraw the balloon in
`the guiding catheter, the Wiktor stent slipped off the
`DISCUSSION
`balloon and remained in the proximal segment of the
`right coronary artery. Subsequently a DOC extension
`An increasing number of case reports describe equip-
`wire was connected to the high torque floppy guidewire
`ment used for coronary intervention and its entrapment,
`and the balloon was removed from the guiding catheter.
`fracture, and retention inside the coronary arteries
`An attempt to cross the stent with a second high torque
`[3-161. Fracture of guidewires and detachment of tips of
`floppy guidewire failed. A 0.014” Schneider guidewire
`balloons on wire have been frequently reported. The long
`could be advanced into the proximal segment of the right
`term sequelae of retained guidewire fragments in patent
`coronary artery and just passed the Wiktor stent (Fig. 3)
`coronary arteries is still uncertain. Only one report [17]
`but could not be advanced distally. A subsequent attempt
`describes diffuse narrowing of the arterial segment that
`to cross the stent with a high torque standard 0.018‘’
`contained a retained guidewire fragment from a PTCA 3
`guidewire was successful. Both guidewires were inserted
`months previously. This experience supports the general
`in a torquer device (Fig. 4) and rotated approximately 15
`opinion that is in favour of removal of undesired foreign
`times, until movement and twisting of the wires in the
`bodies from the coronary artery.
`coronary artery was observed. The guiding catheter was
`Several techniques have been reported for retrieval of
`advanced into the proximal segment of the right coronary
`angioplasty wire fragments from a coronary artery, vary-
`artery, and by a forceful pull on the guiding catheter and
`ing from commercially available systems [ 181 to home
`
`Petitioner Edwards Lifesciences Corporation - Exhibit 1018 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Stent Retrieval
`
`247
`
`Fig. 5. Wiktor stent after removal from the proximal right cor-
`onary artery.
`
`ment of undeployed, retained stents in the coronary ar-
`tery.
`Pan et al. [20] recently reported on peripheral stent
`recovery after failed intracoronary delivery, but they re-
`stricted their report to stents lost from the balloon outside
`the coronary artery. The undeployed stents in our two
`patients however were retained inside the coronary artery
`and could not be retrieved by just withdrawing the bal-
`loon, wire, and guiding catheter assembly. The tech-
`nique of stent retrieval is relatively easy. In our experi-
`ence a relatively stiff wire (high torque standard 0.014
`and 0.01 8") was required to recross the undeployed stent.
`In order to snare a stent with two wires it is essential that
`the second wire not follow the central lumen of the stent
`but crosses one of its filaments. In practice this will be
`the case because traversing the central lumen with the
`second wire is exceptional. This is an advantage in those
`cases in which the stent is difficult to see on fluoroscopy,
`such as for instance the Palmaz-Schatz stent.
`The amount of tension resulting from pulling the wires
`is difficult to quantify. In our second patient a brief
`forceful pull was sufficient to retrieve the stent from the
`coronary artery. We advise trying this first; if it fails
`sustained gentle traction for a short period of time should
`be applied followed by one or more short forceful pulls
`if necessary.
`Losing the stents in our patients was unpredictable
`from the anatomical appearance of the proximal vessel
`segment that had to be stented. There were no excessive
`bends, nor visible calcification (Fig. 2). The use of a
`delivery system [21] probably will prevent loss of stents,
`but these systems are not manufactured for all commer-
`cially available stents.
`The technique described is applicable to stents lost in
`proximal vessels without tortuosity . Retrieval of stents
`lost in proximal tortuous vessels or in distal locations
`should be attempted with extreme care. Pulling the wires
`under these conditions will stretch the proximal vessel
`segment with potential damage. Even if retrieval of an
`
`Fig. 3. Left anterior oblique view showing the undeployed, re-
`tained Wiktor stent in the proximal segment of the right coro-
`nary artery. The 0.014" high torque floppy is positioned distally
`in the right coronary artery; the second guidewire (Schneider)
`has just crossed the stent but could not be positioned distally in
`the right coronary artery.
`
`Fig. 4. Torquer device with both wires inserted.
`
`made devices [ 191. Development of intracoronary stents
`for the prevention of restenosis and treatment of acute
`closure after angioplasty is a valuable tool but has added
`one more item on the list of foreign bodies that can be
`retained inside the coronary artery. Failed delivery and
`unsuccessful deployment has been reported. Failed de-
`livery rarely resulted in clinical sequelae for the pa-
`tient-most
`stents were withdrawn-but
`some emobo-
`lized systemically during attempted withdrawal into the
`femoral sheath [l]. No reports describe details on treat-
`
`Petitioner Edwards Lifesciences Corporation - Exhibit 1018 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Veldhuijzen et at.
`248
`undeployed stent in a coronary artery is not considered,
`snaring it with two wires may be helpful in removing the
`stent during the subsequent surgical procedure.
`
`REFERENCES
`I . Schatz KA, Baim DS, Leon M, Ellis SG, Goldberg S, Hirshfeld
`JW, Cleman MW, Cabin HS, Walker C, Stagg J , Buchbinder M,
`Teirstein PS, Topol EJ, Savage M, Perez JA, Curry RC, Whit-
`worth €1, Sousa JE, Tio F, Almagor Y, Ponder R, Penn IM,
`Leonard B, Levine SL, Fish RD, Palmaz JC: Clinical experience
`with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent; initial results of a multi-
`center study. Circulation 83:148-161, 1991.
`2. Colombo A, Hall P, Thomas J, Almagor Y, Finci L: Initial ex-
`perience with the disarticulated (one-half) Palmaz-Schatz stent: a
`technical report. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 25:304-308, 1992.
`3. Steele PM, Holmes DR, Mankin H, Schaff HT: Intravascular
`retrieval of broken guidewire from the ascending aorta after per-
`cutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc
`Diagn I1:623-628, 1985.
`4. Khonsari S, Livermore J, Mahrer P, Magnusson P: Fracture and
`dislodgement of floppy guidewire during percutaneous translumi-
`nal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 58:855-856, 1986.
`5. Keltai M, Bartek I, Biro V: Guidewire snap causing left main
`coronary occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardio-
`vasc Diagn 12:324-326, 1986.
`6. Krone R: Successful percutaneous removal of retained broken
`coronary angioplasty guidewire. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 12:
`409-410, 1986.
`7. Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD, McConahay DR: Retained percu-
`taneous transluminal coronary angioplasty equipment components
`and their management. Am J Cardiol 60:1260-1264, 1987.
`8. Watson LE: Snare loop technique for removal of broken steerable
`PTCA wire. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 13:44-49, 1987.
`9. Lotan (3, Hasin Y, Stone D, Meyers S, Applebaum A, Gotsman
`M: Guidewire entrapment during PTCA: a potential dangerous
`complication. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 13:309-3 12, 1987.
`10. Stellin G, Ramondo A, Bortolotti U: Guidewire fracture: an un-
`
`usual complication of percutaneous transluminal coronary angio-
`plasty. Int J Cardiol 17:339-342, 1987.
`1 1. Rizzo T, Werres R, Ciccone J, Karanam R, Shah S: Entrapment
`of an angioplasty balloon catheter: a case report. Cathet Cardio-
`vasc Diagn 14:255-257, 1988.
`12. Mikolich JR, Hanson MW: Transcatheter retrieval of intracoro-
`nary detached angioplasty guidewire segment. Cathet Cardiovasc
`Diagn 15:44-46, 1988.
`13. Proctor MS, Loch LV: Surgical removal of guidewire fragment
`following transluminal coronary angioplasty . Ann Thorac Surg
`45 :678 -679, 1988.
`14. Sethi G, Ferguson TB, Miller G, Scott SM: Entrapment of broken
`guidewire in left main coronary artery during percutaneous trans-
`luminal coronary angioplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 47:455-457.
`1989.
`15. Serota H, Deligonul U, Lew B, Kern M, Vandomael M: Im-
`proved method for transcatheter retrieval of intracoronary de-
`tached angioplasty guidewire segments. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn
`17:248-251, 1989.
`16. Van den Brand M, de Feyter P, Sermys PW, Zijlstra F, Bos E:
`Fracture of a balloon on a wire device during coronary angio-
`plasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 16:253-257, 1989.
`17. Doorey AJ, Stillabower M: Fractured and retained guidewire
`fragment during coronary angioplasty-unforeseen
`late sequelae.
`Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 20:238-240, 1990.
`18. Mintz GS, Bemis CE, Unwala AA, Hadjimiltiades S, Kimbiris D:
`An alternative method for transcatheter retrieval of intracoronary
`angioplasty equipment fragments. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 20:
`247-250, 1990.
`19. Savas V, Schreiber T, O’Neill W: Percutaneous extraction of
`fractured guidewire from distal right coronary artery. Cathet Car-
`diovasc Diagn 22:124-126, 1991.
`20. Pan M, Medina A, Romero M, Suhez de Lezo J, Hernandez E,
`Pavlovic D, Meliin F, Marrero J, Cabrera JA: Peripheral stent
`recovery after failed intracoronary delivery. Cathet Cardiovasc
`Diagn 27:230-233, 1992.
`21. Baim DS, Bailey S, Curry C, Walker C, Schatz RA: Improved
`success and safety of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting with a new
`delivery system. Circulation 82(Suppl III):III-657, 1990.
`
`Petitioner Edwards Lifesciences Corporation - Exhibit 1018 - Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket