Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 1 of 52 Page ID #:456
`
`Wallace Wu (State Bar No. 220110)
`wallace.wu@apks.com
`Marty Koresawa (State Bar No. 291967)
`marty.koresawa@apks.com
`Allen Secretov (State Bar No. 301655)
`allen.secretov@apks.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017
`Tel: (213) 243-4000
`Fax: (213) 243-4199
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`John B. Sganga, Jr. (State Bar No. 116211)
`john.sganga@knobbe.com
`Craig S. Summers (State Bar No. 108688)
`craig.summers@knobbe.com
`Christy G. Lea (State Bar No. 212060)
`christy.lea@knobbe.com
`Joshua J. Stowell (State Bar No. 246916)
`joshua.stowell@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, California 92614
`Tel: (949) 760-0404
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
`Case No.: 8:16-CV-0730-CJC-GJS
`and
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
`CORPORATION
`
`Defendant.
`
`Hon. Cormac J. Carney
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 1 of 52
`
`Edwards Lifesciences v. Boston Scientific Scimed
`IPR2017-01294, U.S. Patent 6,371,962
`Exhibit 2003
`
`
`
`Wallace Wu (State Bar No. 220110)
`wallace.wu@apks.com
`Marty Koresawa (State Bar No. 291967)
`marty.koresawa@apks.com
`Allen Secretov (State Bar No. 301655)
`allen.secretov@apks.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017
`Tel: (213) 243-4000
`Fax: (213) 243-4199
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`John B. Sganga, Jr. (State Bar No. 116211)
`john.sganga@knobbe.com
`Craig S. Summers (State Bar No. 108688)
`craig.summers@knobbe.com
`Christy G. Lea (State Bar No. 212060)
`christy.lea@knobbe.com
`Joshua J. Stowell (State Bar No. 246916)
`joshua.stowell@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, California 92614
`Tel: (949) 760-0404
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
`Case No.: 8:16-CV-0730-CJC-GJS
`and
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
`CORPORATION
`
`Defendant.
`
`Hon. Cormac J. Carney
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 1 of 52
`
`Edwards Lifesciences v. Boston Scientific Scimed
`IPR2017-01294, U.S. Patent 6,371,962
`Exhibit 2003
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 2 of 52 Page ID #:457
`
`to the Court’s Order Granting Joint Stipulation On Scheduling
`Pursuant
`Deadlines (Dkt. No. 44), Plaintiffs Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston
`Scientific Scimed, Inc. (collectively, BSC”) and Defendant Edwards Lifesciences
`Corporation (“Edwards”) hereby file their Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`Appendices are filed herewith as follows:
` Appendix A includes claim construction issues upon which the
`parties have agreed.
`the parties proposed constructions and
` Appendix B includes
`supporting evidence for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543; 6,371,962; and
`6,712,827 to Ellis et al. (the Ellis family).
`the parties proposed constructions and
` Appendix C includes
`supporting evidence for U.S. Patent No. 7,749,234 to Euteneuer et al.
`the parties proposed constructions and
` Appendix D includes
`supporting evidence for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,203,558 and 8,709,062 to
`Dusbabek et al. (the Dusbabek family).
`the parties proposed constructions and
` Appendix E includes
`supporting evidence for U.S. Patent No. 6,915,560 to Austin.
`the parties proposed constructions and
` Appendix F includes
`supporting evidence for U.S. Patent No. 7,828,767 to Flanagan.
`In the Appendices, citations to a portion of a specific patent should be
`understood to refer also to corresponding portions of patents within the same family.
`Where a particular figure is identified, the identification should be understood to
`encompass the caption, description of the figure and any text relating to the figure.
`Similarly, where an identified portion of text refers to a figure, the identification
`should be understood to include the text as well as the referenced figure.
`Each party reserves the right to rely on expert testimony in support of its
`proposed constructions and the right to supplement its proposed constructions and
`
`1
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 2 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 3 of 52 Page ID #:458
`
`identification of intrinsic or extrinsic evidence. Each party also reserves the right to
`rely upon, comment on, or rebut any intrinsic or extrinsic evidence cited by the other
`party.
`
`Dated: April 21, 2017
`
`By: /s/ Wallace Wu
`Wallace Wu (State Bar No. 220110)
`wallace.wu@apks.com
`Marty Koresawa (State Bar No. 291967)
`marty.koresawa@apks.com
`Allen Secretov (State Bar No. 301655)
`allen.secretov@apks.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street
`Los Angeles, California 90017
`Tel: (213) 243-4000
`Fax: (213) 243-4199
`Matthew Wolf (pro hac vice)
`matthew.wolf@apks.com
`Edward Han (pro hac vice)
`ed.han@apks.com
`John Nilsson (pro hac vice)
`john.nilsson@apks.com
`Marc Cohn (pro hac vice)
`marc.cohn@apks.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Tel: (202) 942-5000
`Fax: (202) 942-5999
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`2
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 3 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 4 of 52 Page ID #:459
`
`Dated: April 21, 2017
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Brian C. Horne
`John B. Sganga, Jr. (State Bar No. 116211)
`john.sganga@knobbe.com
`Craig S. Summers (State Bar No. 108688)
`craig.summers@knobbe.com
`Christy G. Lea (State Bar No. 212060)
`christy.lea@knobbe.com
`Joshua J. Stowell (State Bar No. 246916)
`joshua.stowell@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Tel: (949) 760-0404
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`
`Brian C. Horne (State Bar No. 205621)
`Brian.horne@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`10100 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 1600
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: (310) 551-3450
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), the filing Party hereby attests that all
`signatories listed concur in this filing’s content and have authorized this filing.
`
`3
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 4 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 5 of 52 Page ID #:460
`APPENDIX A
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`Issues Upon Which The Parties Agree
`
`Exemplary Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`’827 claims 1, 16, 17
`
`vessel
`
`an artery or vein
`
`A-1
`
`Page 5 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 6 of 52 Page ID #:461
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Claim Term
`
`contracted
`state
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`’543 claims 1,
`19; ’962
`claims 1, 20,
`35
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent
`the Court
`deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“state in which
`the size of a
`structure is
`reduced.”
`
`’543 claim 1;
`’962 claim 35
`
`expandable
`inflatable
`means
`
`“structure
`capable of
`being
`expanded and
`inflated.”
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 1-
`7; 1:26-54; 1:57-
`2:9; 2:40-58;
`3:59-65.
`
`Extrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s
`Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th
`ed. (1999)
`(“contract”); The
`American
`Heritage
`Dictionary Of
`The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996)
`(“contract”)
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 1-
`7; 1:26-54; 1:57-
`
`B-1
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`state that the stent
`is left in by the
`crimper
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 8; ’543
`Amendment (1/20/98) at 7;
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:3-9;
`2:12-15; 2:31-34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58; 4:14-30;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:13-
`16; 2:19-23; 2:31-33; 2:38-41; 2:47-65;
`3:24-41; 3:42-45; 3:55-65; 4:6-34; 4:38-
`45; 4:66-5:5;
`’234 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-18; 2:29-
`57; 3:13-15; 3:39-52; 3:54-4:10; 4:42-
`62; 5:4-14; 5:22-6:22; 7:11-40
`
`a balloon that
`expands the stent
`upon inflation
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1, 3; 1:33-
`37; 1:66-2:9; 2:40-58; 2:63-67; 3:20-25;
`3:59-65;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-7; 1:16-
`32; 1:40-45; 2:1-16; 2:19-23; 2:26-33;
`
`Page 6 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 7 of 52 Page ID #:462
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`’962 claim 1
`
`expandable
`inflatable
`means
`
`“structure
`capable of
`being
`expanded and
`inflated.”
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`2:9; 2:40-58;
`3:59-65.
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 1-
`7; 1:26-54; 1:57-
`2:9; 2:40-58;
`3:59-65.
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`2:47-3:32; 3:27-40; 3:66-4:5; 4:25-35
`
`The term is subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-7; 1:16-
`32; 1:40-45; 2:1-16; 2:19-23; 2:26-33;
`2:47-3:32; 3:27-40; 3:66-4:5; 4:25-35
`
`Function: for
`expanding the stent
`from the delivery
`diameter to the
`deployment
`diameter upon
`application of
`deployment pressure
`
`Structure: a balloon
`that expands the
`stent upon inflation
`as pictured and
`described in Figs. 1-
`7 and 1:16-32, 1:40-
`45, 2:1-16, 2:19-23,
`2:26-33, 2:47-3:32,
`3:27-40, 3:66-4:5,
`4:25-35, including
`Item 14 in Figures
`1-7, having the
`shapes, structures,
`materials,
`orientation and
`
`B-2
`
`Page 7 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 8 of 52 Page ID #:463
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`
`Not indefinite
`
`Same as above
`
`’543 claim 1;
`’962 claim 35
`
`inflatable
`portion
`
`’543 claim 19
`
`inflatable
`means
`
`’543 claim 1;
`’962 claims 1,
`35
`
`mounting and
`retaining
`means for
`receiving
`
`The term
`refers to
`“expandable
`inflatable
`means.”
`Not indefinite
`
`The term
`refers to
`“expandable
`inflatable
`means.”
`The term
`“mounting and
`receiving
`means” is not
`subject to 35
`U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`relationships as
`described and
`shown.
`This claim term is
`indefinite.
`
`Same as above
`
`This claim term is
`indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 2-
`8; 1:57-2:9; 3:26-
`58; 3:66-4:37.
`
`The term is subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function: for
`holding the stent in
`place during
`crimping and the
`delivery procedure
`
`Structure: a
`mounting body as
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment (1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for Continued
`Examination (7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to Election (11/21/07) at
`4.
`’234 Amendment (3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment (4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’062 Amendment (2/22/13) at 8.
`U.S. Patent 6,077,273 Office Action
`(6/5/98) at 3-4.
`U.S. Patent 6,077,273 Amendment
`
`B-3
`
`Page 8 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 9 of 52 Page ID #:464
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`
`mounting
`body
`
`’543 claims 1,
`2, 6, 19, 20,
`24, 29; ’962
`claims 1, 2, 6,
`20, 21, 25, 30,
`35, 36
`
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 2-
`8; 1:57-2:9; 3:26-
`58; 3:66-4:37.
`
`B-4
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`pictured and
`described in Figs.
`1-8 and 3:26-38,
`3:55-58; 3:66-
`4:37,2 including:
`Item 30 in Figures
`2-5, Item 30a and
`30b in Figures 6- 7,
`Item 30a, 30b, and
`30c in Figure 8,
`having the shapes,
`structures,
`materials,
`orientation and
`relationships as
`described and
`shown.
`
`If the above
`construction is not
`adopted, the term is
`indefinite
`an enlarged
`structure to which
`the stent is crimped
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`(11/5/98) at 1-8)
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:3-9;
`2:12-15; 2:31-34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58; 4:14-30;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:13-
`16; 2:19-23; 2:31-33; 2:38-41; 2:47-65;
`3:24-41; 3:42-45; 3:55-65; 4:6-34; 4:38-
`45; 4:66-5:5
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment (1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for Continued
`Examination (7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to Election (11/21/07) at
`4.
`’234 Amendment (3/31/08) at 5.
`
`Page 9 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 10 of 52 Page ID #:465
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`the Court
`deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“structure on
`which another
`structure can
`be placed.”
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`Extrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s
`Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th
`ed. (1999)
`(“mount”); The
`American
`Heritage
`Dictionary Of
`The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996) (“mount”)
`
`’543 claim 19 mounting
`
`“mounted/mounting
`[in reference to the
`stent]” means
`“crimped/crimping”
`
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent
`the Court
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims; Figs.
`1-5, 6, 7; 1:57-
`2:9;.2:40-58;
`3:17-58; 4:14-29.
`
`Extrinsic
`
`B-5
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`’234 Amendment (4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’062 Amendment (2/22/13) at 8.
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:3-9;
`2:12-15; 2:31-34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58; 4:14-30;
`’558 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-14; 1:33-
`45; 2:46-67; 3:4-17; 3:50-4:9; 4:12-29,
`38-48, 58-67; 5:7-15; 5:49-56; 5:60-
`6:15; 6:21-28; 6:36-40; 6:50-55; 7:1-10;
`8:33-38; 8:39-59; 9:27-67; 10:8-11:3;
`11:58-65; 12:4-35; 13:21-34; 14:35-56;
`15:13-30; 15:38-60; 16:6-12; 16:28-41;
`17:21-42; 18:51-19:2; 20:4-18; 20:31-
`46; 23:65-67; 24:40-64; 25:37-48;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:13-
`16; 2:19-23; 2:31-33; 2:38-41; 2:47-65;
`3:24-41; 3:42-45; 3:55-65; 4:6-34; 4:38-
`45; 4:66-5:5;
`’234 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-18; 2:29-
`57; 3:13-15; 3:39-52; 3:54-4:10; 4:42-
`62; 5:4-14; 5:22-6:22; 7:11-40
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment (1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for Continued
`Examination (7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to Election (11/21/07) at
`4.
`’234 Amendment (3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment (4/9/09) at 5-6.
`
`Page 10 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 11 of 52 Page ID #:466
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“mounting of a
`stent” means
`“placing of a
`stent.”
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s
`Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th
`ed. (1999)
`(“mount”); The
`American
`Heritage
`Dictionary Of
`The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996) (“mount”)
`
`’962 claim 1
`
`mounted
`
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’962 Patent
`at Claims; Figs.
`1-5, 6, 7; 1:64-
`2:16; 2:47-65;
`
`“mounted/mounting
`[in reference to the
`stent]” means
`“crimped/crimping”
`
`B-6
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`’062 Amendment (2/22/13) at 8.
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:3-9;
`2:12-15; 2:31-34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58; 4:14-30;
`’558 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-14; 1:33-
`45; 2:46-3:3; 3:4-17; 3:50-4:10; 4:12-
`29, 38-48, 58-67; 5:7-15; 5:49-6:15;
`6:36-40; 6:50-55; 7:1-10; 8:33-59; 9:27-
`42; 9:43-49; 9:36-67; 9:35-56; 10:8-64;
`11:58-65; 12:4-10; 12:13-24; 13:21-29;
`14:35-56; 15:13-30; 15:38-49; 16:6-12;
`16:28-41; 17:28-35; 18:51-19:2; 20:4-
`15; 20:31-46; 22:29-45; 24:32-64;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:13-
`16; 2:19-23; 2:31-33; 2:38-41; 2:47-65;
`3:24-41; 3:42-45; 3:55-65; 4:6-34; 4:38-
`45; 4:66-5:5
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`U.S. Patent No. 5,776,141 at 14:31-58;
`U.S. Patent No. 6,325,779 at Fig. 2
`1:40-43, 2:3-5; U.S. Patent No.
`5,242,399 at 4:50-53; EP 0778012 at
`2:31-32
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment (1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for Continued
`Examination (7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to Election (11/21/07) at
`
`Page 11 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 12 of 52 Page ID #:467
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`To the extent
`the Court
`deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“when the
`stent is
`mounted”
`means “when
`the stent is
`placed.”
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`3:24-65; 4:21-34.
`
`Extrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s
`Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th
`ed. (1999)
`(“mount”); The
`American
`Heritage
`Dictionary Of
`The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996) (“mount”)
`
`loaded
`
`’543 claims 1,
`19; ’962
`claims 20, 35
`
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`
`crimped
`
`B-7
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`4.
`’234 Amendment (3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment (4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’062 Amendment (2/22/13) at 8.
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:3-9;
`2:12-15; 2:31-34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58; 4:14-30;
`’558 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-14; 1:33-
`45; 2:46-3:3; 3:4-17; 3:50-4:10; 4:12-
`29, 38-48, 58-67; 5:7-15; 5:49-6:15;
`6:36-40; 6:50-55; 7:1-10; 8:33-59; 9:27-
`42; 9:43-49; 9:36-67; 9:35-56; 10:8-64;
`11:58-65; 12:4-10; 12:13-24; 13:21-29;
`14:35-56; 15:13-30; 15:38-49; 16:6-12;
`16:28-41; 17:28-35; 18:51-19:2; 20:4-
`15; 20:31-46; 22:29-45; 24:32-64;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:13-
`16; 2:19-23; 2:31-33; 2:38-41; 2:47-65;
`3:24-41; 3:42-45; 3:55-65; 4:6-34; 4:38-
`45; 4:66-5:5;
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`U.S. Patent No. 5,776,141 at 14:31-58;
`U.S. Patent No. 6,325,779 at Fig. 2
`1:40-43, 2:3-5; U.S. Patent No.
`5,242,399 at 4:50-53; EP 0778012 at
`2:31-32
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment (1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for Continued
`
`Page 12 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 13 of 52 Page ID #:468
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`’543 claim
`19; ’962
`claim 20
`
`means for
`inflating the
`balloon
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent
`the Court
`deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“mounted
`
`The term is
`subject to 35
`U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function:
`inflating the
`balloon.
`
`Structure: an
`inflation port
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`at Claims; Figs.
`1-5, 6, 7; 1:57-
`2:9;.2:40-58;
`3:17-58; 4:14-29.
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’543 Patent
`at Claims; 2:59-
`3:5.
`
`The term is subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function: inflating
`the balloon.
`
`Structure: fluid (gas
`or liquid) from an
`inflation port
`extending from a
`
`B-8
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`Examination (7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to Election (11/21/07) at
`4.
`’234 Amendment (3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment (4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’062 Amendment (2/22/13) at 8.
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:3-9;
`2:12-15; 2:31-34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58; 4:14-30;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:13-
`16; 2:19-23; 2:31-33; 2:38-41; 2:47-65;
`3:24-41; 3:42-45; 3:55-65; 4:6-34; 4:38-
`45; 4:66-5:5;
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`U.S. Patent No. 5,776,141 at 14:31-58;
`U.S. Patent No. 5,437,083 at 1:58-2:1,
`2:16-23;
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-2; 1:33-
`37; 1:66-2:9; 2:59-3:16; 3:20-25; 3:59-
`65;
`’962 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-2; 1:40-
`45; 2:1-10; 2:55-3:23; 3:27-33; 3:66-4:5
`
`Page 13 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 14 of 52 Page ID #:469
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`’827 claim 16
`
`unexpanded
`condition
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`lumen contained in
`the catheter shaft
`and opening into
`the inflatable
`balloon as pictured
`and described in
`Figs. 1-2 and 1:33-
`37, 1:66-2:9, 2:59-
`3:16, 3:20-25, 3:59-
`65,4 including Item
`28 in Figure 2,
`having the shapes,
`structures,
`materials,
`orientation and
`relationships as
`described and
`shown.
`state that the stent
`is left in by the
`crimper
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`extending
`from a lumen
`contained in
`the catheter
`shaft and
`opening into
`the balloon,
`and
`equivalents
`thereof.
`
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent
`the Court
`deems
`construction
`necessary: “a
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’827 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 1-
`7; 1:34-62; 1:65-
`2:17; 2:47-65;
`3:66-4:5.
`
`B-9
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’827 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-2; 2:47-
`62; 3:24-41; 4:66-5:5;
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`U.S. Patent No. 6,325,779 at 1:25-33
`
`Page 14 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 15 of 52 Page ID #:470
`APPENDIX B
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,543, 6,371,962, and 6,712,827 to Ellis et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`’827 claims 1,
`2, 5, 9, 14, 16,
`17, 18, 19, 20
`
`intermediate
`layer
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`condition in
`which a
`structure has
`not been
`expanded.”
`
`No
`construction
`necessary;
`plain and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent
`the Court
`deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“middle
`layer.”
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Defendants’ Evidence
`
`a “mounting body”
`i.e., an enlarged
`structure to which
`the stent is crimped,
`that lies on the
`inner tube
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment (1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for Continued
`Examination (7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment (11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to Election (11/21/07) at
`4.
`’234 Amendment (3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment (4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’062 Amendment (2/22/13) at 8.
`’827 Patent: Abstract; Figs. 1-8; 2:11-
`17; 2:20-43; 2:56-62; 3:24-65; 4:6-35,
`38-45
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Dictionary.com, available at:
`http://www.dictionary.com/browse/layer
`(“layer”)
`Merriam-Webster, available at:
`https://www.merriam-
`webster.com/dictionary/layer (“layer”)
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., ’827 Patent
`at Claims;
`Abstract; Figs. 2-
`8; 1:65-2:17;
`3:33-65; 4:6-45.
`
`Extrinsic
`Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s
`Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th
`ed. (1999)
`(“intermediate”);
`The American
`Heritage
`Dictionary Of
`The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996)
`(“intermediate”)
`
`B-10
`
`Page 15 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 16 of 52 Page ID #:471
`APPENDIX C
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,749,234 to Euteneuer et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`’234 claims 1, 20
`
`Claim Term
`
`contracted state
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`state that the stent
`is left in by the
`crimper
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`No construction
`necessary; plain
`and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent the
`Court deems
`construction
`necessary: “state in
`which the size of a
`structure is
`reduced.”
`
`Plaintiffs’ Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’234 Patent at
`Claims; Abstract;
`Figs. 1-8, 11-21;
`1:38-63; 2:12-43;
`3:39-52; 5:15-21.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th ed.
`(1999) (“contract”);
`The American
`Heritage Dictionary
`Of The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996) (“contract”)
`
`’234 claims 1, 2, 3,
`6, 8, 18, 19, 20
`
`mounting body
`
`No construction
`necessary; plain
`and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’234 Patent at
`Claims; Abstract;
`Figs. 1-21; 2:12-56;
`3:53-4:15; 4:51-
`
`an enlarged
`structure to which
`the stent is crimped
`
`C-1
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’962 Amendment
`(11/15/00) at 8; ’543
`Amendment
`(1/20/98) at 7;
`’543 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-8;
`2:3-9; 2:12-15; 2:31-
`34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58;
`4:14-30;
`’962 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-8;
`2:13-16; 2:19-23;
`2:31-33; 2:38-41;
`2:47-65; 3:24-41;
`3:42-45; 3:55-65;
`4:6-34; 4:38-45;
`4:66-5:5;
`’234 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-18;
`2:29-57; 3:13-15;
`3:39-52; 3:54-4:10;
`4:42-62; 5:4-14;
`5:22-6:22; 7:11-40
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment
`(1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for
`Continued
`
`Page 16 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 17 of 52 Page ID #:472
`APPENDIX C
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,749,234 to Euteneuer et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`To the extent the
`Court deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“structure on which
`another structure
`can be placed.”
`
`Plaintiffs’ Evidence
`
`5:14; 5:32-6:22;
`6:40-7:40.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., Merriam-
`Webster’s Collegiate
`Dictionary, 10th ed.
`(1999) (“mount”);
`The American
`Heritage Dictionary
`Of The English
`Language, 3rd ed.
`(1996) (“mount”)
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`Examination
`(7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment
`(11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to
`Election (11/21/07)
`at 4.
`’234 Amendment
`(3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment
`(4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’062 Amendment
`(2/22/13) at 8.
`’543 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-8;
`2:3-9; 2:12-15; 2:31-
`34; 2:40-55; 3:17-38;
`3:41-44; 3:54-58;
`4:14-30;
`’558 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-14;
`1:33-45; 2:46-67;
`3:4-17; 3:50-4:9;
`4:12-29, 38-48, 58-
`67; 5:7-15; 5:49-56;
`5:60-6:15; 6:21-28;
`6:36-40; 6:50-55;
`7:1-10; 8:33-38;
`8:39-59; 9:27-67;
`10:8-11:3; 11:58-65;
`
`C-2
`
`Page 17 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 18 of 52 Page ID #:473
`APPENDIX C
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,749,234 to Euteneuer et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’ Evidence
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`’234 claim 1
`
`resiliently deforms No construction
`necessary; plain
`and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent the
`Court deems
`construction
`necessary:
`
`deforms during
`crimping and
`springs back
`toward its original
`shape
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’234 Patent at
`Claims; 5:4-14.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`See dictionary
`definitions relied on
`by Edwards
`
`C-3
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`12:4-35; 13:21-34;
`14:35-56; 15:13-30;
`15:38-60; 16:6-12;
`16:28-41; 17:21-42;
`18:51-19:2; 20:4-18;
`20:31-46; 23:65-67;
`24:40-64; 25:37-48;
`’962 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-8;
`2:13-16; 2:19-23;
`2:31-33; 2:38-41;
`2:47-65; 3:24-41;
`3:42-45; 3:55-65;
`4:6-34; 4:38-45;
`4:66-5:5;
`’234 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 1-18;
`2:29-57; 3:13-15;
`3:39-52; 3:54-4:10;
`4:42-62; 5:4-14;
`5:22-6:22; 7:11-40
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’234 Amendment
`(9/30/08) at 6.
`’234 Amendment
`(4/9/09) at 5-6.
`’234: 5:4-14;
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Dictionary.com,
`
`Page 18 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 19 of 52 Page ID #:474
`APPENDIX C
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,749,234 to Euteneuer et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`’234 claim 1
`
`circumferential
`separation
`
`Plaintiffs’ Evidence
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`separation that
`forms a circle
`around the
`mounting body
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’234 Patent at
`Claims; Abstract;
`Figs. 5, 6; 5:22-47;
`Notice of Allowance
`dated Feb. 26, 2010;
`Amendment dated
`Oct. 5, 2009.
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`“deforms with the
`ability to return
`toward an original
`shape.”
`
`No construction
`necessary; plain
`and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent the
`Court deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“separation in a
`circumferential
`surface.”
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`available at:
`http://www.
`dictionary.
`com/browse/resilient
`(“resilient”)
`Merriam-Webster,
`available at:
`https://www.merriam
`webster.
`com/dictionary/
`resilience
`(“resilience”)
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’234 Amendment
`(10/5/09) at 5.
`’234 Amendment
`(12/22/09) at 5.
`’234 Patent:
`Abstract; Figs. 5, 6,
`7, 9, 10, 12; 5:22-47;
`5:55-64; 6:1-22;
`6:49-60;
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`U.S. Patent No.
`5,824,041 at Figs. 1,
`2, 11, 6:44-67, 7:34-
`40,
`9:29-35; Merriam-
`Webster, available
`
`C-4
`
`Page 19 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 20 of 52 Page ID #:475
`APPENDIX C
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,749,234 to Euteneuer et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’ Evidence
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`
`at:
`https://www.merriam
`webster.
`com/dictionary/
`circumference
`(“circumference”)
`
`C-5
`
`Page 20 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 21 of 52 Page ID #:476
`APPENDIX D
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,203,558 and 8,709,062 to Dusbabek et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`’558 claim 1;
`
`Claim Term
`
`delivery diameter
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’558 Patent at
`Claims; Abstract;
`4:11-5:15
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`state that the stent
`is left in by the
`crimper
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`No construction
`necessary; plain
`and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`To the extent the
`Court deems
`construction
`necessary:
`“diameter prior to
`reaching a
`deployment site.”
`
`’558 claim 1
`
`expandable
`inflation means
`
`This claim
`limitation is not
`subject to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’558 Patent at
`Claims; Abstract;
`Figs. 1-8, 11-14,
`17-24, 28, 29, 31-
`56; 1:15-20; 1:24-
`3:3; 3:28-49; 4:11-
`
`The term is subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function: for
`expanding the stent
`from the delivery
`
`D-1
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’962 Amendment
`(11/15/00) at 8;
`’543 Amendment
`(1/20/98) at 7;
`’558 Patent:
`Abstract; 1:33-45;
`2:46-3:3; 3:4-17;
`3:50-4:10; 4:12-29,
`38-48, 58-67; 5:7-
`15; 5:49-6:15; 6:35-
`42; 6:50-55; 7:1-10;
`8:33-59; 9:27-42;
`9:43-49; 9:36-67;
`9:35-56; 10:8-64;
`11:58-65; 12:4-10;
`12:13-24; 13:21-29;
`14:35-56; 15:13-30;
`15:38-49; 16:6-12;
`16:28-41; 17:28-35;
`18:51-19:2; 20:4-
`15; 20:31-46;
`22:29-45; 24:32-64
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’558 Patent: Figs.
`1-14,17-21, 22-24,
`28-29, 31-37, 40-
`45, 48-56; 1:33-45,
`52-57; 2:15-22, 46-
`49; 3:39-45; 4:11-
`
`Page 21 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 22 of 52 Page ID #:477
`APPENDIX D
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,203,558 and 8,709,062 to Dusbabek et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`5:48; 8:17-38; 8:55-
`67; 9:16-25; 10:1-7;
`11:51-12:3; 11:36-
`63; 13:61-17:4;
`18:31-19:9; 20:4-
`22:45; 22:66-24:30;
`25:9-32; 25:37:49.
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`33, 40-55; 4:58-5:4;
`6:35-40; 8:18-38,
`55-66; 9:1-15, 26-
`35; 10:1-7; 13:60-
`14:2; 14:57-63;
`15:60-16:5; 16:19-
`27; 17:58-18:7;
`19:3-10, 35-43;
`20:4-30; 25:9-32
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`diameter to the
`deployment
`diameter upon
`application of
`deployment
`pressure
`
`Structure: a balloon
`that expands the
`stent upon inflation
`as pictured in Figs.
`1-14, 17-21, 22-24,
`28-29, 31-37, 40-
`45, 48-56, and
`1:33-45, 52-57.
`2:15-22, 46-49,
`3:39-45, 4:11-33,
`40-55, 4:58-5:4,
`6:35-40, 8:18-38,
`55-66, 9:1-15, 26-
`35, 10:1-7, 13:60-
`14:2, 14:57-63,
`15:60-16:5, 16:19-
`27, 17:58-18:7,
`19:3-10, 35-43.
`20:4-30. 25:9-32,
`including Item 14
`in Figures 1-14, 17-
`21, Item 114 in
`Figures 22-23, Item
`
`D-2
`
`Page 22 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 23 of 52 Page ID #:478
`APPENDIX D
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,203,558 and 8,709,062 to Dusbabek et al.
`
`Exemplary
`Claim(s)
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Proposal
`
`Plaintiffs’
`Evidence
`
`’558 claim 1;
`
`mounting and
`retaining means
`
`This claim
`limitation is not
`subject to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`E.g., ’558 Patent at
`Claims; Figs. 1-56;
`3:50-5:48; 8:38-67;
`9:26-12:35; 21:14-
`39; 22:38-44;
`22:66-23:52; 24:40-
`25:5; 25:37-48.
`
`D-3
`
`Defendants’
`Proposal
`134 in Figure 24,
`Item 214 in Figures
`28-29, 31-37, Item
`318 in Figures 38,
`40-42, Item 358 in
`Figures 43-44, Item
`378 in Figure 45,
`Item 414 in Figure
`48-56, having the
`shapes, structures,
`materials,
`orientation and
`relationships as
`described and
`shown.
`The term is subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function: for
`holding the stent in
`place during
`crimping and the
`delivery procedure
`
`Structure: a
`mounting body as
`pictured and
`described in Figs.
`1-12, 47-48, 54-56
`
`Defendants’
`Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’543 Amendment
`(1/20/98) at 6, 7.
`’543 Request for
`Continued
`Examination
`(7/31/98) at 4, 7.
`’962 Amendment
`(11/15/00) at 7, 8.
`’234 Response to
`Election (11/21/07)
`at 4.
`’234 Amendment
`(3/31/08) at 5.
`’234 Amendment
`
`Page 23 of 52
`
`
`
`Case 8:16-cv-00730-CJC-GJS Document 53 Filed 04/21/17 Page 24 of 52 Page ID #:479
`APPENDIX D
`Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
`Case No. 8:16-cv-0730-CJC-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,203,558 and 8,709,062 to D
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
