`Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`Filed: March 19, 2018
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01306
`Patent 8,775,661 B2
`____________
`
`Before GREGG I. ANDERSON, JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, and
`JASON W. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice Dana O. Burwell
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01306
`Patent 8,775,661 B2
`
`
`On January 5, 2018, Petitioner, Akamai Technologies, Inc., filed an
`Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Dana O. Burwell
`(Paper 13, “Motion,” or “Mot.”). The Motion was accompanied by a
`Declaration of Dana O. Burwell in Support of Motion for Admission Pro
`Hac Vice (Ex. 1009).
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel pro hac
`vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In authorizing
`motions for pro hac vice, we require the moving party to provide a statement
`of facts showing there is good cause for us to recognize counsel pro hac
`vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to appear in the
`proceeding.
`Upon review of the Motion and supporting evidence, we determine
`that Petitioner has demonstrated that Dana O. Burwell has sufficient legal
`and technical qualifications to represent Petitioner in the above-identified
`proceedings. We also recognize that there is a need for Petitioner to have
`him involved in this proceeding.
`Accordingly, Petitioner has established that there is good cause for
`admitting Dana O. Burwell.
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Dana O. Burwell is granted; Mr. Burwell is authorized to represent
`Petitioner as back-up counsel in the above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the proceedings; and
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01306
`Patent 8,775,661 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dana O. Burwell is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, and to
`be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in
`37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`PETITIONER:
`Grant K. Rowan
`Mary V. Sooter
`Peter Dichiara
`Zachary P. Piccolomini
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`Grant.Rowan@wilmerhale.com
`Mindy.Sooter@wilmerhale.com
`Peter.Dichiara@wilmerhale.com
`Zachary.Piccolomini@wilmerhale.com
`
`David H. Judson
`THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID H. JUDSON
`mail@davidjudson.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Barry J. Schindler
`Heath Briggs
`Lennie A. Bersh
`Vimal Kapadia
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`SchindlerB@gtlaw.com
`Limelight-iprs@gtlaw.com
`BriggsH@gtlaw.com
`BershL@gtlaw.com
`KapadiaV@gtlaw.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01306
`
`Case IPR2017-01306
`Patent 8,775,661 B2
`Patent 8,775,661 B2
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
