throbber
Paper 19
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Entered: November 22, 2017
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ST. JUDE MEDICAL, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2017-01338 (Patent 6,502,576)
`Case IPR2017-01339 (Patent 6,164,283)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before PATRICK R. SCANLON and JAMES A. WORTH,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`WORTH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Although the proceedings have not been consolidated, this Order addresses
`issues that are common to each of the above-referenced proceedings. The
`parties may use this style caption when filing a single paper in multiple
`proceedings, provided that such caption includes a footnote attesting that
`“the word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in
`the caption.”
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01338 (Patent 6,502,576)
`IPR2017-01339 (Patent 6,164,283)
`
`
`On July 20, 2017, the Board granted Patent Owner, The Regents of
`the University of California (“The Regents”), authorization to file a motion
`to dismiss based on Eleventh Amendment immunity and postponed the due
`date for the Patent Owner Preliminary Response to October 16, 2017. Paper
`7. On July 25, 2017, The Regents filed “Patent Owner’s Motion to
`Dismiss.” Paper 9. On August 1, 2017, Petitioner, St. Jude Medical, LLC
`(“St. Jude”), filed “Petitioner’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss.” Paper 13.
`On August 8, 2017, The Regents filed “Patent Owner’s Reply to Opposition
`to Motion to Dismiss.” Paper 14. The Board denied a request from St. Jude
`to file a sur-reply. Paper 17.
`On September 12, 2017, the Board granted The Regents a two-month
`extension of the due date for the Patent Owner Preliminary Response, i.e.,
`until December 16, 2017.
`On November 16, 2017, a conference call was held between Judges
`Scanlon, Worth, Woods, and counsel for the parties. The Regents requested
`a further extension of the due date for the Patent Owner Preliminary
`Response. St. Jude expressed an interest in completing these proceedings in
`advance of the trial for the parallel district court proceeding, which is
`scheduled for February, 2019. The Regents referred to its motion to dismiss.
`After considering the timing of these Board proceedings, we find a further
`two-month postponement for the Patent Owner Preliminary Response to be
`reasonable.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner Preliminary Response is due February
`16, 2018.
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01338 (Patent 6,502,576)
`IPR2017-01339 (Patent 6,164,283)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Matthew Smith
`SMITH BALUCH LLP
`smith@smithbaluch.com
`
`Zhuanjia Gu
`TURNER BOYD LLP
`gu@turnerboyd.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jonathan Lindsay
`Kainoa Asuega
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`jlindsay@crowell.com
`kasuega@crowell.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket