`Entered: December 5, 2017
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EGENERA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01340
`Patent 6,971,044 B2
`____________
`
`MELISSA A. HAAPALA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Decision on Motion
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01340
`Patent 6,971,044 B2
`
`
`
`Patent Owner has filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of James E.
`Quigley in this proceeding. Paper 10. The motion is supported by a declaration of
`Mr. Quigley. Ex. 2001. Petitioner has not entered an opposition to the motion.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit
`Mr. Quigley pro hac vice.
`
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for admission of James E. Quigley
`pro hac vice is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Quigley is to comply with the Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in
`Part 42 of the C.F.R., and to be subject to the Office’s Code of Professional
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and disciplinary jurisdiction
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01340
`Patent 6,971,044 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David L. McCombs
`Theodore M. Foster
`R. Whitman Burns
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`ipr.theo.foster@haynesboone.com
`whitman.burns.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Christopher Bovenkamp
`John Campbell
`McKOOL SMITH P.C.
`cbovenkamp@mckoolsmith.com
`jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`