throbber
Paper No. 29
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: August 30, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`Before JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM and ELIZABETH M. ROESEL,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ABRAHAM, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01389, Patent 6,896,959 B2
` Case IPR2017-01390, Patent 7,115,331 B21
`____________
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Order addresses similar issues in two cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue a single Order, to be filed in each case. The parties are
`not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01389, Patent 6,896,959 B2
`IPR2017-01390, Patent 7,115,331 B2
`Patent Owner and Petitioner each request an oral hearing pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70. IPR2017-01389, Papers 25, 26; IPR2017-1390, Papers
`25, 26. Each party requests a total of sixty (60) minutes per side for a
`combined oral argument to address the issues presented in IPR2017-01389
`and IPR2017-01390. IPR2017-01389, Papers 25, 26; IPR2017-1390, Papers
`25, 26. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the parties’ requests for
`oral argument are GRANTED.
`Each party will have 60 minutes of total argument time. Petitioner
`bears the ultimate burden of proof that the patent claims at issue in these
`reviews are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will proceed first to present
`its case with regard to whether the challenged claims are unpatentable.
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s arguments. Petitioner
`may reserve rebuttal time to respond to arguments presented by Patent
`Owner, but Petitioner may not reserve more than half of its allotted time for
`rebuttal.
`The hearing shall commence at 1:00 pm (EDT) on September 20,
`2018. The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA.
`Seating will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. The Board will
`provide a court reporter, and the transcript shall constitute the official record
`of the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits, if any, must be
`served seven business days before the hearing. Demonstrative exhibits are
`visual aids to oral argument and not evidence, and should be clearly marked
`as such. For example, each slide may be marked with the words
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01389, Patent 6,896,959 B2
`IPR2017-01390, Patent 7,115,331 B2
`“DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer.
`Demonstrative exhibits may not be used to advance arguments or introduce
`evidence not previously presented in the record. See Dell Inc. v. Acceleron,
`LLC, 884 F.3d 1364, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (noting that the “Board was
`obligated to dismiss [the petitioner’s] untimely argument . . . raised for the
`first time during oral argument”). Instead, demonstrative exhibits should
`cite to the briefs and evidence in the record. Demonstrative exhibits, marked
`as noted above, should be provided to the Board by emailing them to
`Trials@uspto.gov at least three business days before the hearing. A hard
`copy of the demonstratives should also be provided to the court reporter at
`the hearing.
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits. If such objections
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any remaining objections with the
`Board at least two business days before the oral hearing. The objections
`should identify with particularity the portions of the demonstrative exhibits
`that are subject to objection and include a one-sentence statement of the
`basis for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted.
`The Board will consider any objections and schedule a conference call if
`deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will reserve ruling on the
`objections until the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is
`not timely presented will be considered waived.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01389, Patent 6,896,959 B2
`IPR2017-01390, Patent 7,115,331 B2
`attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone
`conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`directed to the Board at 571-272-9797. Requests for audio-visual equipment
`are to be made no later than 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`request is to be sent directly to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the
`hearing.
`In light of the foregoing, it is:
`ORDERED that the oral hearing, conducted pursuant to the
`procedures outlined above, shall commence at 1:00 PM (EDT) on September
`20, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01389, Patent 6,896,959 B2
`IPR2017-01390, Patent 7,115,331 B2
`PETITIONER:
`
`Paul Ragusa
`Eliot Williams
`Robert Scheinfeld
`Robert Maier
`Jessica Lin
`BAKER BOTTS LLP
`paul.ragusa@bakerbotts.com
`eliot.williams@bakerbotts.com
`robert.scheinfeld@bakerbotts.com
`robert.maier@baterbotts.com
`jessica.lin@bakerbotts.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`John T. McKee
`Kevin P.B. Johnson
`Joseph Milowic III
`Brett N. Watkins
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`josephmilowic@quinnemanuel.com
`brettwatkins@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket