UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Ultratec, Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Sorenson IP Holdings,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR: Unassigned
`
`Patent No. 9,336,689
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MEME HILLEY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Ultratec, Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Sorenson IP Holdings,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR: Unassigned
`
`Patent No. 9,336,689
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MEME HILLEY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Meme Hilley, do hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a paralegal at Quarles & Brady LLP, attorneys for Petitioner. I
`
`make this declaration based on personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`I reviewed the docket for IPR2013-00288 (concerning U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,379,801), which shows that the final written decision of the Board was not
`
`appealed.
`
`3.
`
`I reviewed the assignment records on the PTO’s website, which shows
`
`that Sorenson IP Holdings, LLC is the current owner of U.S. Patent No. 9,336,689
`
`and that the patent and its parent applications previously were owned by Sorenson
`
`Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1003 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 9,336,689,
`
`the patent that is the subject of the present Petition.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 1004 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,881,441.
`
`Exhibit 1005 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,567,503.
`
`Exhibit 1006 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,428,702.
`
`Exhibit 1007 is a true and correct copy of the Florida State Courts
`
`System’s January 2009 “Title II Guidelines for the State Courts System of Florida”
`
`containing its “Policy on Court Real-Time Transcription Services for Persons Who
`
`are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.” The document is published on the Florida State
`
`Courts Web site, flcourts.org. As of May 4, 2017, it was available directly at
`
`2
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`http://www.flcourts.org/core/fileparse.php/243/urlt/TitleTwo.rtf or by navigating to
`
`http://flcourts.org/administration-funding/court-administration/ada-
`
`information.stml and selecting the link titled, “The Title II Guidelines.” Exhibit
`
`1007 was downloaded from this website.
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1008 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from National
`
`Association of Broadcasters Engineering Handbook (10th Ed., Taylor & Francis,
`
`2007), including the “Closed Captioning Systems” chapter by Jeff Hutchins et al.
`
`10. Exhibit 1009 is a true and correct copy of a 1996 Settlement
`
`Agreement Between the United States of America and the Florida State Courts
`
`System, including its attachment, “Policy on Court Real-Time Transcription
`
`Services for Persons Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.” The agreement and
`
`attachment are published on the website of the United States Department of
`
`Justice,
`
`justice.gov. As of May 4, 2017,
`
`it was available directly at
`
`https://www.justice.gov/crt/foia/readingroom/frequent_requests/ada_settlements/fl/
`
`fl11.txt or by navigating to https://www.justice.gov/crt/florida and selecting the
`
`link titled, “US v. Florida State Court System.” Exhibit 1009 was downloaded
`
`from this website.
`
`11. Exhibit 1010 is a true and correct copy of the Florida State Courts
`
`System’s October 2007 “Provision of Real-Time Court Reporting Services for
`
`Attorneys with Disabilities” containing
`
`its “Policy on Court Real-Time
`
`3
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Transcription Services for Persons Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.” The
`
`document is published on the Florida State Courts Web site, flcourts.org. As of
`
`May 4, 2017, it was available directly at http://jud18.flcourts.org/gen_public/
`
`pubs/bin/guidelines-realtime.rtf. Exhibit 1010 was downloaded from this website.
`
`12. Exhibit 1011 is a true and correct copy of the Final Written Decision
`
`in IPR2013-00288 (Paper 63, October 30, 2014).
`
`13. Exhibit 1012 is a true and correct copy of the Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,379,801 in in IPR2013-00288.
`
`14. Exhibit 1013 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 13/768,918.
`
`15. Exhibit 1014 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 13/768,918.
`
`16. Exhibit 1015 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 13/768,918.
`
`17. Exhibit 1016 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 13/768,918.
`
`18. Exhibit 1017 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 14/530,407.
`
`19. Exhibit 1018 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 14/530,407.
`
`4
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`20. Exhibit 1019 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 14/530,407.
`
`21. Exhibit 1020 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the file
`
`history of Application No. 14/530,407.
`
`22. Exhibit 1021 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,379,801.
`
`23. Exhibit 1022 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,909,482.
`
`24. Exhibit 1023 is a true and correct copy of the following article:
`
`Marcele M. Soviero, Captioning Could be a Boon to Many Viewers, Popular
`
`Science (Oct. 1993, Vol. 243 No. 4).
`
`25. Exhibit 1024 is a true and correct copy of the following document:
`
`Report, In the Matter of Closed Captioning and Video Description of Video
`
`Programming, FCC MM Docket No. 95-176 (July 29, 1996). As of May 4, 2017, it
`
`was directly available at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-
`
`318A1.pdf or by navigating to https://www.fcc.gov/document/closed-captioning-
`
`and-video-description-video-programming-2 and selecting the link under the
`
`“Files” heading. Exhibit 1024 was downloaded from this website.
`
`26. Exhibit 1025 is a true and correct copy of the following article:
`
`Dorothy Smith, Communication in the Courtroom: Technology is helping to
`
`provide equal access to the law, Gallaudet Today (Spring 1989).
`
`27. Exhibit 1026 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,260,011.
`
`5
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`28. Exhibit 1027 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the following
`
`book: James Martin, Design of Man-Computer Dialogues (Jan. 1, 1973).
`
`29. Exhibit 1028 is a true and correct copy of the following article: Joseph
`
`Shapiro, Technology No Longer Distances Deaf Culture (May 1, 2006). As of May
`
`4, 2017, it was available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5374451,
`
`from where it was printed.
`
`30. Exhibit 1029 is a true and correct copy of the following article: Lloyd
`
`Vries, Pagers Become Lifeline For Deaf (Nov. 21, 2003). As of May 4, 2017, it
`
`was available at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pagers-become-lifeline-for-deaf/,
`
`from where it was printed.
`
`31. Exhibit 1030 is a true and correct copy of the following article: Susan
`
`Donaldson James and Grace Huang, Deaf and Proud to Use Sign Language (Dec.
`
`12,
`
`2006). As
`
`of May
`
`4,
`
`2017,
`
`it was
`
`available
`
`at
`
`http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=2719254, from where it was printed.
`
`
`
`May 9, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Meme Hilley
`
`
`6
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1002
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 6 of 6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
