`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 33
`Entered: May 18, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC.,
`HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS (Thailand) CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NITTO DENKO CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01421
`Patent 8,895,870
`
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Decision on Motion
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01421
`Patent 8,895,870
`
`
`Patent Owner has filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of Anri
`Nakamoto in this proceeding. Paper 20. The motion is supported by a
`declaration of Mr. Nakamoto. Paper 20. Petitioner did not file an
`opposition within the one week period.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Nakamoto pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for admission of Anri
`Nakamoto pro hac vice is granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01421
`Patent 8,895,870
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jennifer Hayes
`Daniel J. Burnham
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com
`dburnham@nixonpeabody.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Alex V. Chachkes
`Donald Daybell
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`a34ptabdocket@orrick.com
`d2dptabdocket@orrick.com
`
`
`3
`
`