throbber
Paper 51
`Date: August 21, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`FOX FACTORY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SRAM, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2017-01440
`Patent 9,291,250 C1
`_______________
`
`Before MICHAEL W. KIM, FRANCES L. IPPOLITO and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`TRIAL HEARING
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01440
`Patent 9,291,250 C1
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner each requested a hearing in this proceeding
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). Papers 44, 48. The requests are granted.
`This proceeding will be heard in the afternoon of September 11, 2018,
`beginning at 1:00 p.m. Each party will have 60 minutes of total argument time.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s patent claims at
`issue are unpatentable. Also, Petitioner and Patent Owner have each filed a
`Motion to Exclude Evidence. Therefore, at oral hearing, Petitioner will proceed
`first to present its case with respect to the challenged claims and grounds with
`respect to which the Board instituted trial, and any arguments in support of its
`Motion to Exclude. Petitioner may reserve rebuttal time. Thereafter, Patent
`Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation and argue its Motion to Exclude.
`Patent Owner may also reserve rebuttal time. Petitioner may use any of its
`remaining time for rebuttal regarding the challenged claims, and for opposing
`Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude. Patent Owner may then use any of its
`remaining time for rebuttal regarding its Motion to Exclude. There is no motion to
`amend to be addressed at the hearing.
`New arguments not previously presented in the parties’ substantive papers in
`this proceeding should not be raised at oral hearing.
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the ninth
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-
`person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The
`Board will provide a court reporter for the hearings, and the reporter’s transcripts
`will constitute the official record of the hearings.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served five
`business days prior to the hearing. The parties shall confer with each other
`regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits, and file the demonstrative
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01440
`Patent 9,291,250 C1
`
`exhibits with the Board at least two business days prior to the hearing. For any
`issue that cannot be resolved after conferring with the opposing party, the parties
`may file jointly a one-page list of objections at least two business days prior to the
`hearing. The list should identify with particularity which demonstrative exhibits
`are subject to objection and include a short statement (no more than one sentence)
`of the reason for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted.
`We will consider the objections and schedule a conference call if necessary.
`Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the objections until after the hearing. Any
`objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be considered
`waived.
`The parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent
`Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, slip op. at 2–5 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper
`118), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The parties are
`reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`hearings to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcripts. The parties
`also should note that at least one member of the panel will be attending the oral
`hearing electronically from a remote location. Paper copies of the demonstrative
`exhibits may be submitted to the panel at hearing time, but are not required.
`Because of limitations of the audio transmission systems in the hearing room, the
`presenter may speak only when standing at the hearing room lectern. If the parties
`have questions as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible
`to all of the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board at (571) 272-9797.
`The Board expects lead counsel for Petitioners and Patent Owner to be
`present at the hearing, although any back-up counsel may make the actual
`presentation, in whole or in part. If lead counsel for a party will not be in
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01440
`Patent 9,291,250 C1
`
`attendance at the hearing, the Board should be notified via a joint conference call
`no later than two days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearing are to be made five days
`in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If
`the requests are not received timely, equipment may not be available on the day of
`the hearing.
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01440
`Patent 9,291,250 C1
`
`
`For Petitioner:
`Joshua Goldberg
`Joshau.goldberg@finnegan.com
`Arpita Bhattacharyya
`Arpita.chattacharyya@finnegan.com
`Daniel Klodowski
`Daniel.klodowski@finnegan.com
`
`
`For Patent Owner:
`Michael Hickey
`mhickey@lewisrice.com
`Kirk Damman
`kdamman@lewisrice.com
`Benjamin Siders
`bsiders@lewisrice.com
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket