throbber

`
`Document made
`
`available under
`
`the
`
`Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
`
`International application number: PCT/SE2010/050368
`
`International filing date:
`
`01 April 2010 (01.04.2010)
`
`Document type:
`
`Certified copy of priority document
`
`Document details:
`
`Country/Office: US
`Number:
`61/250,962
`
`Filing date:
`
`13 October 2009 (13.10.2009)
`
`Date of receipt at the International Bureau;
`
`23 April 2010 (23.04.2010)
`
`Remark:
`
`Priority document submitted or transmitted to the International Bureau in
`compliance with Rule 17.1(a) or (b)
`
`
`
`World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) - Geneva, Switzerland
`Organisation Mondiale de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OMPI) - Geneve7 Suisse
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,‘*1‘»;cw»?{-
`
`PA 7233184
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`" WEN}.
`m mmmn IH
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`April 02, 2010
`
`THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ANNEXED HERETO IS A TRUE COPY FROM
`
`THE RECORDS OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`
`OFFICE OF THOSE PAPERS OF THE BELOW IDENTIFIED PATENT
`
`APPLICATION THAT MET THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE GRANTED A
`FILING DATE UNDER 35 USC 1 11.
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER: 61/250,962
`
`FILING DATE: October 13, 2009
`
`THE COUNTRY CODE AND NUMBER OF YOUR PRIORITY
`
`APPLICATION, TO BE USED FOR FILING ABROAD UNDER THE PARIS
`
`CONVENTION, IS US61/250,962
`
`By Authority of the
`
`Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property
`and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(M
`
`T. LAWRENCE
`
`Certifying Officer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` L.amuaammmmmmmznammmamsmuuuasu
`
`
`
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Provisional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Payment Type
`
`
`
`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`Application Number:
`
`0
`
`61250962
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Title of Invention:
`Method and Arrangement in a Telecommunication System
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Robert Baldemair
`
`
`
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Steven Ware Smith
`
`Receipt Date:
`13-OCT—2009
`
`
` Application Type:
`
`Payment information:
`
`Deposit Account
`
`.
`
`.
`
`
`
`File Size(Bytes)/
`
`Multi
`
`Pages
`
`
`
`Authorized User
`
`Document
`
` "—MH w‘nuh‘n!‘ k" I [SD-r” from “‘9,
`IFW lrnaae Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 3
`
`

`

`P30197-
`US1_2009-10-13_09-3408_Pro
`isiona|_Application__As_Filed.
`pdf
`
`493589
`
`93258fl592371c430b1bd6485e66b52b41 1:
`9dlbcd
`
`Multipart Description/PDF files in .zip description
`
`3 1
`
`4
`
`
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Fee Worksheet (PTO-875)
`
`fee-info.pdf
`
`62re1fl4fa34895ed247646cf943d255aefAfi I
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 1 1 1
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1 .53(b)—(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1 .54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/E0/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 1 1 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/R0/1 05) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 4
`
`

`

`PTO/59116 (1007)
`Approved for use through OSBDIZOI 0. OMB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Offlm: US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Underth Papenvork Reduction Auto! 1995. nopersons are required to respond to a chIecIIon of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT COVER SHEET - Page 1 of 2
`This is a request for filing a PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT under 37 CFR 1.53(c).
`Express Mail Label No.
`‘
`l
`
`-
`
`
`
`Given Name (first and middle fifanyl)
`Family Name or Surname
`Residence
`Cl
`and either Slate or Forein Coun
`
`
`Baldemair
`Solna. Sweden
`Stockholm. Sweden
`
`Gerstenberger
`
`Larsson
`
`Stockholm. Sweden
`
`Sclna. Sweden
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TITLE OF THE INVENTION (500 characters max):
`
`separately numbered sheets attached hereto
`
`
`
`
` Direct all correspondence to:
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`
`The address corresponding to Customer Numben
`
`Firm or
`Individual Name
`Address
`
`on
`
`27045
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ E
`
`
`
`
`
`NCLOSED APPLICATION PARTS (check aII that apply)
`
`
`I:I Application Data Sheet. See 37 CFR 1.76
`D CDis). Number of CDs
`E Drawing(s) NumberofShaets 2
`I:I Other (specify)
`
`
`
`
`Specification (e.g. description ofthe invention) Number ofPages
`'1
`
`
`Fees Due: Filing Fee 015220 (5105 for small entity).
`If the specification and draw rigs exceed 100 sheets of paper. an applition size tee is
`also due. which is $270 ($130 for small entity) for each additional 50 sheets or fraction thereof. See 35 U.S.C. 41(a)(1)(G) and 37 CFR 1 .16(s).
`
`
`METHOD OF PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE AND APPLICATION SIZE FEE FOR THIS PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT
`Applicantclaimssmallentity status. See37 CFR 1.27.
`I:I A check or money order is enclosed to cover the filing fee and application size fee (if applicable).
`
`
`TOTAL FEE AMOUNT (S)
`Payment by credit card. Form PTO-2038 is attached
`The DirectorIs hereby authorized to charge the filing fee and application size fee (if applicable) or credit any overpayment to Deposit
`
`
`Account Number: $94M. A duplicative copy of this form is endosed for fee processing.
`USE ONLY FOR FILING A PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.51. The Information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and trth USPTO
`to process) an application. confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 3 hours to complete.
`lndudlng sathefina- preparing. and summing the completed application form to the USPTO. firm will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments
`on the amount of time you require to complete this form andJor suggeenions for reducing this burden. should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, US. Patent
`and Trademark Office. US. Department 01 Commerce. 90- BOX 1450. Alexandria. VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES 0R COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND To: Commissioner for Patents. PD. Box 1450. Alexandrla. VA 22313-1450.
`"you need assistance in comptetr’ng the form. call rename-9199 and select option 2.
`
`
`
`
` Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`PROVISIONAL APPLICATION COVER SHEET
`Page 2 of 2
`
`PTOISBnG (1 M7)
`Approved for usethrough 0613012010. OMB 0651-0032
`us. Patent and Trademark Office: US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act at 1995. no persons are required to respond to a coiledion of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`
`
` The invention was made by an agency ofthe United states Government or under a contract with an agency of the United States Government.
`No.Yes. the name of the us. Government agency and the Government contract number are:
`
`WARNING:
`Petitioner/applicant is cautioned to avoid submitting personal information in documents filed in a patent application that may
`contribute to identity thefi. Personal information such as social security numbers, bank account numbers. or credit card
`numbers (other than a check or credit card authorization form PTO-2038 submitted for payment purposes) is never required by
`the USPTO to support a petition or an application.
`If this type of personal information is included in documents submitted to
`the USPTO, petitioners/appiicants should consider redacting such personal information from the documents before submitting
`them to the USPTOr Petitioner/applicant is advised that the record of a patent applition is available to the public after
`pubtition of the application (unless a non-publication request in compliance with 37 CFR 1.213(a) is made in the application)
`or issuance of a patent. Furthermore. the record from an abandoned application may also be available to the public if the
`application is referenced in a published applitlon or an issued patent (see 37 CFR 1.14). Checks and credit rd
`authorization forms PTO-2038 submitted for payment purposes are not retained in the application file and therefore are not
`publicly available.
`..
`
`SIGNATURE %{ é .
`
`TYPED or pamreo NAME Sidney L. Weatherford
`
`TELEPHONE 972-583-8656
`
`Date Octgber 13, 2009
`
`REGISTRATION NO. 45,602
`(if appropriate)
`Docket Number: P30197-US1
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`Method and Arrangement in a Telecommunication System
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to a method and arrangement in
`
`a
`
`telecommunication system,
`
`in particular
`
`to methods
`
`and
`
`arrangements for transmission of TPC commands
`communication network.
`
`in a wireless
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`The Long-Term Evolution of the UTRAN, also denoted LTE, uses
`
`OFDM in the downlink and DPT—spread OFDM in the uplink. The
`
`basic LTE downlink physical resource can thus be seen as a
`
`time-frequency grid where each resource element corresponds
`
`to one OFDM subcarrier during one OFDM symbol
`
`interval.
`
`In
`
`the time domain,
`
`LTE downlink transmissions are organized
`
`into radio frames of 10 ms, each radio frame consisting of
`
`ten equally—sized
`
`subframes of
`
`length Tamfiwm =
`
`1 ms.
`
`Furthermore,
`
`the resource allocation in LTE is typically
`
`described in terms of
`
`resource blocks, where
`
`a
`
`resource
`
`block corresponds to one slot
`
`(0.5 ms)
`
`in the time domain
`
`and
`
`12
`
`contiguous
`
`subcarriers
`
`in the
`
`frequency domain.
`
`Resource blocks
`
`are
`
`numbered
`
`in the
`
`frequency domain,
`
`starting with 0 from one end of the system bandwidth.
`
`Downlink transmissions are dynamically scheduled,
`
`i.e.
`
`in
`
`each subframe the base station transmits control information
`
`about
`
`terminals to which data is transmitted and on which
`
`resource blocks
`
`the data is transmitted in the current
`
`downlink
`
`subframe. This
`
`control
`
`signaling is
`
`typically
`
`transmitted in the first 1, 2,
`subframe.
`
`3 or 4 OFDM symbols in each
`
`
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`receiving
`the terminal, after
`hybrid—ARQ, where
`downlink data in a subframe, attempts to decode said data
`
`attempt,
`decoding
`erroneous data.
`
`the
`
`base
`
`station can
`
`retransmit
`
`the
`
`signaling from the terminal
`Uplink control
`station consists of
`
`to the base
`
`the decoding was
`and reports to the base station whether
`successful
`(ACK) or not
`(NAK).
`In case of an unsuccessful
`
` LTE uses
`
`-
`
`0
`
`0
`
`acknowledgements
`hybrid—ARQ
`received downlink data;
`
`for
`
`the
`to
`related
`reports
`terminal
`downlink channel conditions, used as
`assistance
`for
`the
`downlink
`scheduling;
`
`scheduling requests,
`a mobile
`terminal
`resources
`for
`transmissions.
`
`indicating that
`needs
`uplink
`uplink
`data
`
`If
`
`the mobile
`
`terminal has not been assigned an uplink
`
`resource
`
`for
`
`data
`
`transmission,
`
`the
`
`L1/L2
`
`control
`
`information
`
`(e.g.
`
`channel—status
`
`reports,
`
`hybrid—ARQ
`
`acknowledgments, and scheduling requests)
`
`is transmitted in
`
`uplink resources (resource blocks) specifically assigned for
`
`uplink L1/L2 control
`
`on Physical Uplink Control CHannel
`
`(PUCCH). These resources are located at
`
`the edges of
`
`the
`
`total available cell bandwidth. Each such resource consists
`
`of 12 “subcarriers” (one resource block) within each of the
`
`two
`
`slots of
`
`an uplink subframe.
`
`In order
`
`to provide
`
`frequency diversity,
`
`these frequency resources are frequency
`
`hopping on the slot boundary,
`
`i.e. one “resource” consists
`
`of 12 subcarriers at
`
`the upper part of the spectrum within
`
`the first slot of a subframe and an equally sized resource
`
`at the lower part of the spectrum during the second slot of
`
`the subframe or vice versa. If more resources are needed for
`
`copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 8
`
`

`

`
`
`in case of very
`the uplink Ll/L2 control signaling, e.g.
`large overall
`transmission bandwidth
`supporting a
`large
`number of users, additional resources blocks can be assigned
`next to the previously assigned resource blocks.
`
`The reasons for locating the PUCCH resources at the edges of
`the overall available spectrum are two-fold:
`
`0 Together with the frequency hopping described above,
`the
`frequency diversity experienced by the control
`signaling is maximized;
`
`PUCCH at other
`the
`for
`0 Assigning uplink resources
`positions within the spectrum,
`i.e. not at
`the edges,
`would have fragmented the uplink spectrum» making it
`impossible to assign very wide transmission bandwidths
`to single mobile terminal and still retain the single—
`carrier property of the uplink transmission.
`
`The bandwidth of one resource block during one subframe is
`too large for
`the control
`signaling needs of
`a single
`terminal. Therefore,
`to efficiently exploit
`the resources
`
`can
`signaling, multiple terminals
`for control
`set aside
`share the same resource block. This is done by assigning the
`different
`terminals different orthogonal phase rotations of
`a cell-specific length-12 frequency-domain sequence and/or
`different
`orthogonal
`time—domain
`covers
`covering
`the
`subframes within a slot or subframe.
`
`In
`The LTE Rel-8 standard supports bandwidths up to 20 MHz.
`order
`to meet
`the
`upcoming
`INT-Advanced
`requirements
`bandwidths larger than 20 MHz need to be supported. However,
`one
`important
`requirement
`is
`to
`assure
`backward
`compatibility with LTE Rel-8. This
`should also include
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 9
`
`

`

`
`
`LTE~
`an
`that
`imply
`spectrum compatibility. That would
`should appear as
`a
`Advanced carrier, wider
`than 20 MHz,
`number of LTE carriers to an LTE Rel-8 terminal. Each su¢h
`carrier can be referred to as a component carrier (CC).
`In
`particular
`for early LTE-Advanced deployments
`it
`can be
`expected that
`there will be
`a
`smaller
`number of
`LTE—
`Advanced—capable
`terminals
`compared
`to many
`LTE
`legacy
`terminals. Therefore, it is necesaary to assure an efficient
`use of a wide carrier also for legacy terminals,
`i.e.
`that
`it is possible to implement carriers where legacy terminals
`can be scheduled in all parts of the wideband LTE-Advanced
`carrier. The straightforward way to obtain this would be by
`means of carrier aggregation. Carrier aggregation implies
`that an LTE-Advanced terminal can receive multiple CC, where
`the CC have, or at
`least the possibility to have,
`the same
`structure as a Rel-8 carrier.
`
`for uplink and downlink. A
`individual CC may be different
`symmetric configuration refers to the case where the number
`of
`CC
`in downlink and uplink is
`the
`same whereas
`an
`
`asymmetric configuration refers to the case that the number
`of CC is different. It is important
`to note that the number
`of CC configured in a cell may be different from the number
`of CC seen by a terminal: A terminal may for example support
`more downlink CC than uplink CC,
`even.
`though the cell
`is
`configured with the same number of uplink and downlink CC.
`
`the Physical Downlink
`on
`is done
`the CC
`Scheduling of
`(PDCCH) via downlink assignments. Control
`Control Channel
`information on the PDCCH is formatted as a Downlink Control
`
`downlink
`for
`DCI messages
`(DCI) message.
`InfOrmation
`assignments contain among others resource block assignment,
`modulation and coding scheme related parameters, hybrid—ARQ
`redundancy version, etc.
`In addition to those parameters
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 10
`
`

`

`transmission most DCI
`relate to the actual downlink.
`formats
`for downlink. assignments also contain. a bit field
`for Transmit waer Control
`(TPC)
`commands.
`These
`TPC
`commands
`are used to control
`the uplink power control
`behavior of the corresponding PUCCH that is used to transmit
`the hybrid-ARQ feedback.
`
`asymmetric
`and
`symmetric
`both
`UE perspective,
`From a
`uplink/downlink CC configura:ions are supported. For some of
`the configurations,
`one may consider
`the possibility to
`transmit the uplink control
`information on multiple PUCCH or
`multiple uplink CC. However, this option is likely to result
`in higher 08 power consumption and a dependency on specific
`UE capabilities.
`It may' also create implementation issues
`due
`to
`inter—modulation
`products,
`and would
`lead
`to
`generally higher complexity for implementation and testing.
`
`have
`no
`Therefore,
`the
`transmission
`of
`PUCCH
`should
`i.e. as
`dependency on the uplink/downlink CC configuration,
`a design principle all uplink control
`information for a 03
`should be semi-statically mapped onto one specific uplink CC
`(“anchor carrier”).
`
` that
`
`SUMMARY
`
`In case a terminal is scheduled on multiple downlink CC each
`
`a downlink assignment contains
`that contains
`DCI message
`for
`the
`corresponding
`PUCCH
`also
`a
`TPC
`command
`transmissions. However, all TPC commands refer to the same
`uplink CC (all uplink control
`information is transmitted on
`a single uplink CC). Thus,
`in the best case transmitting TPC
`within multiple
`DCI messages
`results
`in
`unnecessary
`overhead.
`In the worst case the TPC commands are different
`leading to unpredictable UE behavior.
`
`Copy provided by USPTO irom the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 11
`
`

`

`this would
`TPC bits in all but one DCI messages. However,
`increase the number of blind decodings that the terminal has
`
`to perform since a
`
`terminal
`
`is
`
`supposed to decode DCI
`
`messages with certain sizes. Removing the TPC bits in some
`
`DCI message changes their size thus adding blind decodings.
`
`Therefore, according to the basic idea of embodiments of the
`
`present invention, TPC bit fields are transmitted in all DCI
`
`messages containing downlink assignments, whereby only the
`TPC bits transmitted within one PDCCH contains a true TPC
`
`commands. The other TPC bit fields are used to signal
`other relevant information.
`
`some
`
`By this means overhead (the total number of transmitted bits
`
`is kept constant while
`
`increasing the payload size)
`
`is
`
`reduced.
`
`Furthermore
`
`the
`
`situation
`
`is
`
`avoided where
`
`contradicting TPC commands
`
`can be
`
`sent
`
`to the
`
`terminal
`
`leading to unpredictable terminal behavior. The
`
`invention
`
`also allows packing larger resource allocations/larger DCI
`formats
`into
`the
`payload
`size
`of
`smaller
`resource
`
`allocations/DCI formats thus reducing the DCI format sizes a
`
`terminal
`decodings.
`
`has
`
`to
`
`nwnitor
`
`resulting
`
`in
`
`reduced
`
`blind
`
` The straight forward solution would be to just to remove the
`
`if it has been determined 11 that multiple
`-assigning 12,
`downlink component carriers (CC) are simultaneously assigned
`
`Briefly,
`
`the present
`
`invention relates
`
`to a method and
`
`arrangement
`
`in a network node, whereof
`
`embodiments are
`
`described
`following:
`
`by means
`
`of
`
`non—exclusive
`
`examples
`
`in
`
`the
`
`A first aspect of the present
`
`invention relates to a method
`
`performed in a network unit of a telecommunication network
`
`comprising the steps of
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the lFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 12
`
`

`

`a TPC command to only one of
`Control Messages
`(DCI) messages
`conveying
`assignments;
`
`the Downlink
`the
`downlink
`
`-applying
`
`14,
`
`where
`
`appropriate,
`
`the
`
`bit
`
`fields
`
`corresponding to the TPC command
`convey other relevant information.
`
`in the other
`
`PDCCH to
`
`According to further embodiments of the present invention as
`described above, said other parameters are
`
`-indicators to PUCCH or PUSCH resources;
`
`—extensions of the resource assignment;
`
`-extension to other parameters that do not exist/are smaller
`
`in the DCI
`command.
`
`format used on that PDCCH conveying the true TPC
`
` to a terminal,
`
`According to further embodiments of the present invention as
`
`described above,
`
`the PDCCH that carries the true TPC command
`
`—is explicitly configured 13a;
`
`-is implicitly determined 13b, e.g. based on one or more of
`
`index,
`component carrier (CC)
`configured on the different CC.
`
`system bandwidth, DCI
`
`formats
`
`According
`invention,
`
`present
`the
`of
`embodiment
`another
`yet
`to
`the unused TPC bits are used to accommodate the
`
`carrier
`
`indicator
`
`for
`
`the PDCCH that do not control
`
`the
`
`component carrier on which they are sent.
`
`A second aspect of
`
`the present
`
`invention relates
`
`to a
`
`network unit 20 comprising a first circuit 21 adapted for
`
`been determined that multiple
`has
`if
`assigning,
`-
`carriers
`(CC)
`23
`are
`simultaneously
`downlink
`component
`assigned to a terminal 30, a TPC command to only one 241 of
`
`it
`
`the Downlink Control Messages
`downlink assignments;
`
`— applying, where appropriate,
`
`(DCI) messages conveying the
`
`the bit fields corresponding
`
`to the TPC command in the other DCI messages 242 to convey
`other relevant information.
`
`Copy prOVided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 13
`
`

`

`described above, said circuit 21 is adapted to select
`said other parameters
`
`for
`
`-indicators to PUCCH or PUSCH resources;
`
`—extensions of the resource assignment;
`
`According to further embodiments of the present invention as
`
`described above, a second circuit 22 connected to said first
`
`circuit 21 is adapted
`
`-to explicitly configure the PDCCH that carries the true TPC
`command 241;
`
`~to implicitly determine the PDCCH that carries the true TPC
`
`command 241, e.g. based on one or more of component carrier
`
`system bandwidth, DCI formats configured on the
`index,
`(CC)
`different CC.
`
`According
`invention,
`
`another
`yet
`to
`said first circuit
`
`present
`the
`of
`embodiment
`21
`is adapted to use the
`
`unused TPC bits to accommodate the carrier indicator for the
`
`PDCCH that do not control
`they are sent.
`
`the component carrier on which
`
`Other
`
`objects,
`
`advantages
`
`and
`
`novel
`
`features
`
`of
`
`the
`
`invention will become apparent
`
`frmn the following detailed
`
`description of the invention when considered in conjunction
`with the accompanying drawings.
`
`—extension to other parameters that do not exist/are smaller
`in the DCI
`format used on that PDCCH conveying the true TPC
`command.
`
` According to further embodiments of the present invention as
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Figure 1
`
`illustrates an example embodiment of
`
`the method
`
`according to the present invention.
`
`Copy Provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 14
`
`

`

`illustrates an example embodiment of
`
`a network
`
`unit comprising a circuit adapted for performing the method
`according to the present invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
` Figure 2
`
`In case
`
`the
`
`terminal
`
`receives
`
`downlink
`
`assignments
`
`on
`
`multiple CC,
`
`the TPC bit field transmitted on one PDCCH is
`
`used to transmit a true TPC command. The UE needs to know in
`
`which of
`
`the PDCCH the TPC bit field is the TPC command.
`
`some
`alternatively,
`configured or,
`be
`can either
`This
`implicit
`rule is used, e.g.
`the PDCCH addressing that CC
`
`with the lowest CC index contains true TPC command. Another
`
`rule would be
`
`to base the PDCCH on
`
`the downlink system
`
`bandwidth of the CC that is addressed by the PDCCH, e.g.
`
`the
`
`PDCCH that points to the CC with the lowest system bandwidth
`
`contains the true TPC command. If multiple downlink CC have
`
`the same bandwidth a combination of multiple implicit rules
`can be used.
`
`The TPC field in the other PDCCH is used to convey other
`
`information. One possibility is to use these bits to signal
`
`the PUCCH or PUSCH resources that should be used to convey
`
`the hybrid-ARQ bits of
`
`channel
`
`transmissions.
`
`the corresponding downlink shared
`
`It
`
`is even possible to combine the
`
`bits from all other PDCCH and use this wider bit field to
`
`address one large PUCCH or PUSCH resource out of a somewhat
`
`larger
`
`resource pool.
`
`It
`
`is
`
`also possible
`
`to combine
`
`implicit
`
`and explicit
`
`PUCCH or
`
`PUSCH resource signaling,
`
`e.g.
`
`some parts of the PUCCH or PUSCH resource(s) addresses
`
`are explicitly signaled and the remaining part is signaled
`via the TPC bit fields.
`
`Another' possibility is to use the free TPC bit
`
`fields to
`
`extend resource block assignments. This is especially useful
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 15
`
`

`

`if the true TPC command is sent on that PDCCH that addresses
`
`the CC with the lowest downlink system bandwidth. Without
`
`any restrictions on which downlink CC can be scheduled from
`
`which downlink CC the number of blind decoding can become
`
`very large since the terminal has to monitor possible PDCCH
`
`candidates for each downlink CC on each downlink CC. If the
`
`CC have different system bandwidths
`
`the DCI messages have
`
`different sizes resulting in an increased number of blind
`
`detections. Using the free TPC bit
`
`fields on the PDCCH
`
`addressing the wider
`
`CC
`
`to extend their
`
`resource block
`
`assignment
`
`fields
`
`(increasing relative to the
`
`smallest
`
`system bandwidth among all scheduled or configured CC) makes
`
`it possible to address the resources on the wider CC without
`
`increasing the DCI message size (relative to the DCI format
`
`that
`
`contains
`
`the
`
`true
`
`TPC
`
`command)
`
`and
`
`thus without
`
`increasing the number of blind decodings.
`
` 10
`
`A similar situation occurs
`
`if different downlink CC are
`
`requiring DCI messages
`configured with transmission modes
`with different sizes. If the true TPC command is sent on the
`
`PDCCH addressing the downlink CC that requires the smallest
`
`DCI
`
`formats the TPC bit
`
`fields on the other PDCCH can be
`
`used to convey the information of larger DCI messages within
`
`the payload size of the smaller DCI message.
`
`In this way the
`
`terminal does not have to monitor more DCI payload sizes
`
`thus not increasing the number of blind decodings.
`
`A further possibility is to use the free TPC bits on each
`
`carrier to indicate the component carrier that is addressed
`
`by the PDCCH,
`
`in case it is not
`
`the PDCCH associated with
`
`the DI. CC that carries multiple PDCCH,
`
`in case a carrier
`
`indicator is used. As an example, assuming up to 5 component
`
`carriers being configured, and a TPC bit field of size 2 per
`
`the PDCCH associated with the DL CC carrying multiple
`PDCCH,
`PDCCH for other CC would include the true TPC command. The
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 16
`
`

`

`
`
`11
`
`other four
`PDCCH would include a 2 bit carrier indicator,
`indicating which of
`the four CC that
`is controlled by the
`respective PDCCI-I.
`
`Copy provided by USPTO from the IFW Image Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 17
`
`

`

`
`
`P30197—US1
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`determining that multiple downlink
`component carriers (CC) are
`simultaneously assigned to a
`terminal
`
`
`
`12 /‘ only one of the Downlink Control
`Messages (DCI) messages
`conveying the downlink
`
`
`
`
`
` assigning a TPC command to
`assignments
`
`
`
`Explicitly configure the
`Implicitly determine the
`PDCCH that carries the
`PDCCH that carries the
`
`
`true TPC command
`true TPC command
`
`
`
`
`
`
`applying, where appropriate, the bit fields
`corresponding to the TPC command in the
`
`other PDCCH to convey other relevant
`
`
`information.
`
`
`
`14
`
`Fig. 1
`
`Conv nrovided bv USPTO from the IFW Imaae Database on 04/01/2010
`
`
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 18
`
`

`

`20
`
`23
`
` P301 97-US1
`
`2/2
`
`21
`
`‘241
`
`NI.2
`
`242
`
`Fig. 2
`
`30
`
`Copy provided hv USPTO firom the lFW lmaue Database on 04/01/2010
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1005, Page 19
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket