R1-081711
`
`
`
`
`
`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`Agenda item
`3
`Title:
` Final Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #52bis v1.0.0
`
`
`(Shenzhen, China, 31 march – 4 April, 2008)
`Document for:
` Approval
`Source:
`
`MCC Support
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fact Summary
`Meeting:
`Dates:
`Venue:
`Host:
`Attendees:
`Documents:
`
`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #52bis
`31st March through 4th April, 2008
`Intercontinental Shenzhen, CHINA
`ZTE Corporation
`199 delegates
`542 (including some withdrawn and post-meeting artefacts)
`
`Patrick Mérias
`ETSI Mobile Competence Center
`F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
`Tel: +33 4 92 94 42 06
`
`Patrick.merias@etsi.org
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 1
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`Table of contents
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`
`Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................... 4
`1. Opening of the meeting ........................................................................................................................ 6
`1.1
`Call for IPR ....................................................................................................................................................... 6
`2.
`Approval of the agenda ......................................................................................................................... 6
`3.
`Approval of the minutes from previous meeting ............................................................................... 6
`4.
`Liaison statement handling .................................................................................................................. 7
`5. Maintenance of UTRA Release 99 – Release 8 ............................................................................. 14
`6. Maintenance of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN ................................................................................... 18
`6.1
`Finalization of TS 36.211 .............................................................................................................................. 18
`6.1.1
`Downlink reference signals .................................................................................................................... 18
`6.1.2
`Uplink reference signals ......................................................................................................................... 22
`6.1.3
`Downlink Control Signaling .................................................................................................................... 23
`6.1.4
`Uplink Control Signaling ......................................................................................................................... 31
`6.1.5
`Mapping of virtual resource blocks to physical resource blocks ....................................................... 38
`6.1.6
`Remaining issues for TDD and FDD HD .............................................................................................. 39
`6.1.7
`Other remaining issues for 36.211 ........................................................................................................ 41
`6.2
`Finalization of TS 36.212 .............................................................................................................................. 41
`6.3
`Finalization of TS 36.213 .............................................................................................................................. 42
`6.3.1
`Timing synchronization ........................................................................................................................... 43
`6.3.2
`UL/DL Power Control .............................................................................................................................. 43
`6.3.3
`Inter-cell Interference Coordination ....................................................................................................... 47
`6.3.4
`RACH timing and preamble sequence selection ................................................................................ 49
`6.3.5
`UE Procedures for downlink shared channel ...................................................................................... 50
`6.3.6
`UE Procedures for uplink shared channel ........................................................................................... 56
`6.3.7
`Remaining issues for TDD and FDD HD .............................................................................................. 57
`6.3.8
`Other remaining issues for 36.213 ........................................................................................................ 58
`6.4
`Finalization of TS 36.214 .............................................................................................................................. 59
`6.5
`Finalization of TS 36.306 .............................................................................................................................. 59
`
`2 2
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 2
`
`

`

`R1-081711
`
`
`
`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`7
`Enhanced Uplink for CELL_FACH State in FDD ............................................................................ 60
`8.
`HS-PDSCH serving cell change enhancements............................................................................. 62
`9.
`Study Item on Dual-Cell HSDPA Operation ..................................................................................... 63
`10. 64QAM for 1.28 Mcps TDD HSDPA ................................................................................................. 65
`11. Enhanced CELL_FACH state in 1.28 Mcps TDD (UL/DL) ............................................................ 66
`12. Continuous Connectivity for packet data users for 1.28Mcps TDD ............................................. 67
`13. Study Item on Scope of future HSPA Evolution for 1.28Mcps TDD ............................................. 67
`14. Closing of the meeting ........................................................................................................................ 68
`Annex A: List of participants at RAN1 #51 .............................................................................................. 69
`Annex B: TSG RAN WG1 meetings in 2008 .......................................................................................... 70
`Annex C: List of CRs agreed at RAN1#51 .............................................................................................. 71
`Annex D: List of Outgoing LSs from RAN1#51 ...................................................................................... 73
`Annex E: List of Tdocs at RAN1 #51 ....................................................................................................... 75
`Annex F: List of actions ............................................................................................................................. 76
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 3
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`Executive summary
`3GPP TSG WG RAN1 #52bis meeting took place at Intercontinental Shenzhen, CHINA.
`
`The meeting started at 9:20 on Monday 31st March and finished at 17:30 on Friday 4th April 2008.
`
`
`
`The week was scheduled as follows:
`
` Monday: Common session on Agenda items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6.1, 6.1.1 and 6.1.2.
`
` Tuesday: Agenda items 6.1.6, 6.3.7, 6.3, 6.3.6 and 6.1.3.
`
` Wednesday: Agenda items 6.3.4, 6.3.2 and 6.1.4.
`
` Thursday morning: Main room (España) DVRB (AI 6.1.5), Channel coding (AI 6.2), UE categories (AI 6.5)
`chaired by Sadayuki Abeta. Breakout room (Madrid 3) HSPA FDD (AI 5) chaired by Dirk Gerstenberger.
`
` Thursday afternoon: Main room (España) CQI (AI 6.3.5) chaired by Juho Lee. Breakout room (Madrid 3)
`HSPA FDD (AI 7, 8 and 9) chaired by Dirk Gerstenberger.
` Breakout room (Madrid 8) Drafting sessions on
`TBS Table, Downlink RS issues, UL SRS
`
` Friday morning: Agenda items 6.3.3, and revisions on 4 and 5.
`10, 11, 12 and 13) chaired by Sadayuki Abeta.
`
`Breakout room (Madrid 3) HSPA TDD (AI
`
` Friday afternoon: Revisions
`
`
`
`The list of action points that required RAN1 close follow-up is listed in Annex F (end of document).
`
`
`
`The number of contribution documents for this meeting was 518, and those documents were categorized as followed.
`
`Agenda Item
`Liaison statement handling
`Maintenance of UTRA R99 – Rel8
`Maintenance of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN
`Enhanced Uplink for CELL_FACH State in FDD
`HS-PDSCH serving cell change enhancements
`Study item on Dual-Cell HSDPA Operation
`64QAM for 1.28Mcps TDD HSDPA
`Enhanced CELL_FACH in 1.28Mcps TDD (UL/DL)
`Continuous Connectivity for Packet Data users for
`1.28Mcps TDD
`Study Item on Scope of future HSPA Evolution for
`1.28Mcps TDD
`
`Input
`Document
`34
`38
`386
`17
`5
`17
`4
`7
`5
`
`Discussed
`Document
`34
`38
`130
`17
`5
`17
`4
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`5
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 4
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`The following set of documents is missing. The corresponding contributions have not been handed over by companies.
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`R1-081238
`
`Timing for Enhanced Uplink in Cell_FACH
`
`Samsung
`
`R1-081252
`
`PHICH resource allocation in TDD
`
`LG Electronics
`
`R1-081277
`
`Remaining details on UL DM RS hopping pattern generation
`
`Motorola
`
`R1-081288
`
`CCE Sizing
`
`R1-081300
`
`Remaining details on Nd=2 DVRB operation
`
`R1-081315
`
`Mapping of precoded WB CQI to non-precoded WB CQI
`
`R1-081319
`
`Disscussion on the inter-cell interference for EUL
`
`Motorola
`
`Motorola
`
`Motorola
`
`HUAWEI
`
`R1-081333
`
` CCE Size Selection and the Hashing Function
`
`Freescale Semiconductor
`
`R1-081350
`
`DTX/DRX aspect for 1.28Mcps TDD CPC
`
`TD Tech
`
`R1-081368
`
`Blind decoding for PDCCH
`
`Texas Instruments
`
`R1-081397
`
`Details of the Common and UE Specific Search spaces
`
`NEC Group
`
`R1-081505
`
`Hashing function for starting-point of UE-specific search space
`
`Philips
`
`R1-081554
`
`PMI bit length for EUTRA TDD
`
`R1-081627
`
`DVRB To PRB Mapping
`
`R1-081689
`
`Block-Code for CQI on PUSCH
`
`
`
`Via Technology
`
`ZTE
`
`Marvell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(R1-081412)
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 5
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`Opening of the meeting
`1.
`Mr. Dirk Gerstenberger (RAN1 Chairman) welcomed the participants to the 52bis RAN WG1 meeting and opened the
`meeting at 09:20.
`
`Mr. Zhisong Zuo from ZTE Corporation welcomed the delegates on behalf of the Chineese Friends of 3GPP.
`
`Call for IPR
`1.1
`The Chairman drew attention to Members’ obligations under the 3GPP Partner Organizations’ IPR policies. Every
`Individual Member organization is obliged to declare to the Partner Organization or Organizations of which it is a
`member any IPR owned by the Individual Member or any other organization which is or is likely to become
`essential to the work of 3GPP.
`
`
`The attention of the members of this Technical Specification Group is drawn to the fact that 3GPP
`Individual Members have the obligation under the IPR Policies of their respective Organizational Partners
`to inform their respective Organizational Partners of Essential IPRs they become aware of.
`
`The members take note that they are hereby invited:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`to investigate in their company whether their company does own IPRs which are, or are likely to become
`Essential in respect of the work of the Technical Specification Group.
`
`to notify the Director-General, or the Chairman of their respective Organizational Partners, of all
`potential IPRs that their company may own, by means of the IPR Statement and the Licensing declaration
`forms (e.g. see the ETSI IPR forms http://webapp.etsi.org/Ipr/).
`
`Approval of the agenda
`
`Draft Agenda for RAN1#52bis meeting
`R1-081165
`Dirk Gerstenberger (Chairman) proposed the agenda for the meeting.
`
`RAN1 Chairman
`
`
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): Scheduling for HSPA was discussed. Parallel session is foreseen by Thursday to let
`more time for preparation.
`Decision: The agenda was approved.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Approval of the minutes from previous meeting
`
`Draft report of RAN1#52 meeting
`R1-081574
`The document was presented by Patrick Mérias.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: The document is noted and approved.
`
`MCC Support
`
`(R1-081166)
`
`6 6
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 6
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Liaison statement handling
`
`R1-081711
`
`= R2-081311
`Reply LS on code rate limitations for HS-DSCH UE cat 13 and 15 RAN2, Ericsson
`R1-081168
`The document was presented by Johan Bergman from Ericsson. RAN2 agrees to implement the correction in TS 25.306 as
`proposed by RAN1.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`Response LS to RAN5 on HSPA RB and SRB configurations in
`R1-081169
`34.108
`The document was presented by Johan Bergman from Ericsson.
`
`RAN2, Ericsson
`
`= R2-081319
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`= R2-081320
`RAN2, Ericsson
`LS on new MCCH radio bearer configuration in 34.108
`R1-081170
`The document was presented by Johan Bergman from Ericsson. RAN2 has checked and confirmed the correctness of the
`layer-2 parameters of the new MCCH radio bearer configuration proposed in the CR (section 6.10.2.4.3.9) attached to the
`LS RAN2 received from RAN5.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`LS on UTRAN enhancements for the support of inter-cell
`R1-081178
`interference cancellation
`The document was presented by Sharad Sambhwani from Qualcomm.
`
`RAN3, Qualcomm
`
`= R3-080548
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): NSN mentioned the existence of contributions related to that topic for further
`discussion.
`Decision: Document is noted and Mr Chairman decided to look at them.
`
`Inter-cell Interference Cancellation in CELL_DCH and
`
`Qualcomm Europe
`R1-081357
`CELL_FACH
`The document was presented by Sharad Sambhwani from Qualcomm. The document demonstrates some use-case
`scenarios where inter-cell interference cancellation (IC-IC) may be beneficial in evolved HSPA networks and proposes one
`additional message over NBAP/RNSAP to allow the S-RNC to signal to an ICIC-capable NodeB appropriate information
`on interfering UEs that are served by neighbor NodeBs.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`System Performance of ICIC
`R1-081436
`Not treated during Monday’s session.
`
`Qualcomm Europe
`
`
`
`On the benefits of Inter-cell interference cancellation to HSPA
`R1-081428
`Nokia Siemens Networks
`
`networks
`The document was presented by Thomas Chapman from NSN and concludes that further analysis is required of the likely
`impact on RoT of terminals that have not yet been added to the active set. Also, the RX DPCCH levels typical of such UEs
`should be analyzed in order to check whether inter-cell interference cancellation is indeed likely to be feasible in such
`cases.
`
`NSN does not feel that RAN1 can yet reply to RAN3 that signaling to support inter-cell interference cancellation could be
`beneficial.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`
`7 7
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 7
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`Decision: Document is noted. The topic shall be revisited on Thursday.
`
`
`
`Thursday 3rd
`
`R1-081711
`
` (R1-081436)
`Qualcomm Europe
`System Performance of ICIC
`R1-081615
`The document was presented by Sharad Sambhwani from Qualcomm and shows simulation results of the system
`performance of HSPA networks where inter-cell interference cancellation (IC-IC) is enabled.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted. Continue discussion at next meeting.
`
`
`
`GERAN, Nokia Siemens
`R1-081167
`Reply LS on CSG related mobility (stage 2 text)
`= GP-080417
`Networks
`The document was presented by Mieszko Chmiel from NSN. In this Liaison Statement, GERAN is requesting more
`clarifications from RAN2 on:
`
` Segregation of identities between CSG cells and public E-UTRAN cells
`
` Support of handover to CSG cells
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`Reply LS on radio problem detection as part of radio link failure
`R1-081171
`handling
`The document was presented by Lars Lindbom from Ericsson
`
`RAN2, Ericsson
`
`= R2-081358
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`RAN2, Ericsson
`LS on the change rate of physical layer parameters
`R1-081172
`The document was presented by Erik Dahlman from Ericsson. Actions for RAN1 are:
`
`= R2-081362
`
` RAN2 kindly asks RAN1 to reply to the following question:
`
`What is the anticipated change rate of the aforementioned uplink control parameters (P0,NOMINAL_PUSCH, , P0,
`
`UE_PUSCH, P0, PUCCH ) and the PRACH transmit power setting parameter?
`
` RAN2 would appreciate if RAN1 could, in future updates of the draft L1parameter list to be configured by RRC,
`indicate which parameters are expected to change often (i.e. change more often than once per hour) and provide
`the expected frequency of change for those parameters.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): PC discussion is foreseen on Thursday’s session
`Decision: Document is noted. This shall be revisited in connection with PC discussion.
`
`Friday 4th
`
`Update of the parameter list is available (in R1-081645). Erik Dahlman from Ericsson suggested the LS be postponed until
`next meeting.
`
`
`
`LS on various aspects related to GERAN to E-UTRAN
`= R2-081363
`RAN2, Motorola
`R1-081173
`interworking
`The document was presented by Robert Love from Motorola where RAN2 is requesting action from GERAN on the topic
`of E-UTRA neighbour lists used for mobility from GERAN to E-UTRAN.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`8 8
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 8
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`LS on PRB usage measurements in reply to R1-080617
`R1-081174
`The document was presented by Sadayuki Abeta from NTT DoCoMo
`
`RAN2, NTT DoCoMo
`
`= R2-081368
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): NTT DoCoMo requested clarification where PRB related measurements should be
`described (RAN1 or RAN2 specifications?)
`Decision: Document is noted. RAN1 preferences are to specify these measurements in RAN2 specs.
`
`
`
`Reply LS on Signaling of additional spectrum emission
`R1-081175
`requirements
`The document was presented by Rapeepat Ratasuk from Motorola
`
`RAN3, Motorola
`
`= R3-080449
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`LS on RAN performance monitoring
`R1-081176
`The document was presented by Sadayuki Abeta from NTT DoCoMo.
`
`RAN3, NTT DoCoMo
`
`= R3-080530
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): Ongoing discussions between RAN3 and SA5
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`SA5, Nokia Siemens
`R1-081183
`LS reply on RAN Performance monitoring
`= S5-080540
`Networks
`The document was presented by Mieszko Chmiel from NSN and is a response LS from SA5 clarifying role when working
`on performance measurement definitions.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`LS on Self Configuring and Self Optimizing Network Use Cases
`R1-081177
`and Solutions TR
`The document was presented by Georg Wannemacher from T-Mobile.
`
`RAN3, T-Mobile
`
`= R3-080536
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`LS on Scale of Reported Measurement Quantities
`R1-081180
`The document was presented by Ylva Jading from Ericsson
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): No actions to RAN1
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`RAN4, Ericsson
`
`= R4-080484
`
`Response to LS on switch time requirements for LTE TDD
`R1-081181
`The document was presented by Lars Lindbom from Ericsson.
`
`RAN4, Ericsson
`
`= R4-080535
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`= R4-080541
`RAN4, NTT DoCoMo
`LS on signaling Intra/Inter-frequency measurement bandwidth
`R1-081182
`The document was presented by Sadayuki Abeta from NTT DoCoMo. As a conclusion, RAN4 asks RAN2 to develop the
`relevant RRC signaling such that the eNode B can indicate to the UE the channel bandwidth of neighbour E-UTRA cells
`
`9 9
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 9
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`that the UE is required to measure in both ACTIVE and IDLE states, such that the UE can accurately make use of a wider
`measurement bandwidth in these states.
`
`R1-081711
`
`
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`Nokia Siemens Networks,
`Comments and Simulation Results Related to RAN2 LS on
`R1-081441
`
`Nokia
`BCCH Transmission (R1-080632)
`The document was presented by Mieszko Chmiel from NSN and provides simulation results to evaluate the worst case
`number of transmissions needed for System Information delivery and proposes the following:
`
` The worst case number of BCCH transmissions in case of time consecutive and time spares system information
`transmission
`
` Time diversity is beneficial from the system information transmission point of view
`o The reception of multiple SUs in parallel, when feasible from the RAN2 point of view, introduces a
`manageable UE complexity increase comparing to the serial SU reception
`o Furthermore, if retransmissions are confined within an 80 ms window (SU-1’s TTI), the latency increase
`due to time diversity is moderate
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted. Mr Chairman decided to look at R1-081206 as proposed by Panasonic.
`
`R1-081206
`BCCH on DL-SCH
`Panasonic
`The document was presented by Hidetoshi Suzuki from Panasonic and proposes the following:
`
`
`
` The (re)transmissions of SI-1 are in the subframe #5 in every radio frame with an even SFN.
`
` Both initial transmissions and retransmissions of SIs except SI-1 are done within a single time window.
`
` A timing restriction is applied for all SIs except SI-1. The number of transmissions (including retransmissions) of
`SIs except SI-1 is limited to two per 10ms. One is within subframe #0 to #4. The other is within subframe #5 to
`#9.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted. Mr Chairman asked for off line discussion.
`
`Friday 4th
`
`Draft LS on SI-1 transmission
`R1-081607
`The document was presented by Erik Dahlman from Ericsson.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted and LS is agreed in R1-081676
`
`Ericsson
`
`
`
`
`
`LS on implications of MIMO precoding schemes on RAN4
`R1-081179
`RAN4, Nokia
`= R4-080426
`requirements
`The document was presented by Asbjörn Grovlen from Nokia and indicates three precoding features which may need to be
`re-assessed in RAN1.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`R1-081247
`
`Draft response to LS on implications of MIMO precoding
`schemes on RAN4 requirements
`
`LG Electronics, Samsung,
`ETRI
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 10
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`The document was presented by (…) from LGE and proposes a reply LS to RAN4 with following conclusion: to keep
`staying with the current working assumption of both zero/small-delay CDD, as well as the wideband precoding support
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`R1-081379
`Performance of wideband precoding and small delay CDD
`Texas Instruments
`
`The document was presented by (…) from TI and take a look at the performance of small-delay CDD and wideband
`precoding. In this document, Zero-delay CDD is also used in conjunction with wideband precoding as a reference.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`R1-081575
`Reconsideration on 2 Tx Codebook for Precoding
`NEC Group
` (R1-081556)
`The document was presented by Ng, Boon loong (…) from NEC and proposes to remove the Identity Matrix from the 2Tx
`rank-2 codebook as it does not provide any gain over the one without the first entry (as shown by simulation results in
`Section-2).
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`R1-081573
`Comments on RAN4 LS on MIMO precoding (R1-081179)
`Nortel
`
`The document was presented by Hua Xu from Nortel and as a conclusion, recommends keeping antenna selection for 2-tx
`system in LTE.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): Questions on cross polarized antenna were raised and discussed.
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`R1-081565
`
`Refinement on MIMO Precoding Schemes
`
`Ericsson, Fujitsu,
`Motorola, NEC, Nokia,
`Nokia Siemens Networks,
`NTT DoCoMo,
`Panasonic, Texas
`Instruments
`The document was presented by George Jöngren from Ericsson and is a text proposal to refine MIMO precoding schemes in 36.211.
`
`(R1-081541)
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`LGE requested to further present the following contribution:
`
`
`LG Electronics
`Further System Level Evaluation of Closed-loop MIMO
`R1-081262
`The document was presented by (…) from LGE and provides an evaluation of two closed-loop combinations under several
`channel and system scenarios. It concludes as follows:
`
` Zero-delay CDD mode is appropriate for the wideband precoding in order not to hurt the precoding gain in a high
`correlation channel.
`
` Small-delay CDD mode is beneficial for the frequency selective precoding in order to increase multi-user
`scheduling gain under high loaded cell.
`
` Timing misalignment across the transmit antennas degrades the performance of wideband precoding significantly,
`thereby requiring fine tuning of the misalignment for wideband precoding.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`As a conclusion of the LS and above set of contributions, proposal is as follow:
`
` Agree on reduction of codebook as stated in R1-081565, including removing small delay CDD. In addition
`Identity Matrix for 2 layers closed loop case for 2 TX antennas can be removed.
`
`11 11
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 11
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
` Above proposal is supported by Nokia, NSN, NTT DoCoMo, Panasonic, Ericsson, Motorola, Mitsubishi,
`Qualcomm, NEC, Huawei, TI, Interdigital, Icera, and Fujitsu. In order not to slow down the entire process, both
`LGE and Samsung finally agree with the proposal.
`
` Nortel still maintains their objection as they believe antenna selection for 2-tx system in LTE is a feature that
`should remain in the specs and requested extra time for off line discussion, and further evaluation on the
`performance impact at the system-level. Nortel argued that, although RAN4 simulation results have shown no
`performance difference, their link-level simulation results have shown a more significant performance impact in
`removing the AS codewords.
`
`Friday 4th
`
`R1-081668
`Way Forward for Antenna Selection
`Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent
`
`The document was presented by Miss Anna Tee from Nortel and explains Nortel’s recommendations in response to the LS
`from RAN4.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): Nortel confirmed they maintain their objection. As Mr Chairman proposed the topic
`being revisited at next meeting, NTT DoCoMo with others expressed their disagreement for postponing the decision.
`Vodafone, Vierzon Wireless and Alcatel-Lucent confirmed also their objection to R1-081565.
`Decision: Document is noted. As no decision could have been reached, decision shall be taken at next meeting, by vote if
`no consensus possible.
`
` Above way forward in R1-081668 is rejected by Ericsson, Nokia, NSN, NTT DoCoMo, Samsung, Panasonic,
`NEC, Qualcomm, Huawei, Fujitsu and Mitsubishi.
`
`Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent,
`Philips, Vodafone,
`Verizon, Orange, T-
`Mobile
`
`
`
`R1-081669
`
`Draft response to LS on implications of MIMO schemes on RAN4
`requirements R1-081179 (R4-080426)
`
`
`
`Recently received Incoming LS
`
`Thursday 3rd
`
`LS on RAN2 status on Enhanced uplink for CELL_FACH state in FDD RAN2, Huawei
`R1-081590
`The document was presented by (…) from Huawei.
`
`= R2-081969
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`R1-081643
`Reply LS to HS-DPCCH usage with Enhanced Uplink in Cell_FACH
`The document was presented by Karri Ranta-aho from NSN.
`
`RAN3, Nokia Siemens
`Networks
`
`= R3-080963
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`Friday 4th
`
`LS on Half-Duplex FDD
`R1-081644
`The document was presented by Ylva Jading from Ericsson.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`RAN4, Ericsson
`
`= R3-081644
`
`R1-081647
`LS on E-UTRAN Neighbour Cell list information for GERAN
`The document was presented by Prakash Bhat from Vodafone.
`
`GERAN2, Telecom Italia,
`Vodafone
`
`= G2-080231
`
`12 12
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 12
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`13 13
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 13
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`5.
`
`Maintenance of UTRA Release 99 – Release 8
`
`
`
`25.212 CR0262 (Rel-8, B) HS-SCCH orders for HS-SCCH-less
`R1-081515
`Ericsson
`
`operation
`The document was presented by Johan Bergman from Ericsson and deals with scenarios where HS-SCCH-less operation is
`configured in the UE but not needed from a network performance point of view (e.g. in low-load scenarios), the UE power
`consumption can be reduced if the serving NodeB has a possibility to deactivate (and, if needed, reactivate) HS-SCCH-less
`operation for the UE. For further description, see R1-080904.
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted.
`
`Corresponding CR to 25.214 is in R1-081618
`
`25.214 CR0483r1 (Rel-8, B) HS-SCCH orders for HS-SCCH-less
`R1-081618
`operation
`The document was presented by Johan Bergman from Ericsson.
`
`Ericsson
`
`(R1-081516)
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment): NSN expressed their doubt having such technique implemented. Question: is the CR
`really needed?
`As equivalent CRs have been presented in RAN2 with same question mark, RAN2 decision is conditioned to RAN1
`agreement.
`Another approach to the text could be made (Philips’ proposal).
`Decision: Document is noted. Discussion should go on and topic will be revisited at next meeting.
`
`
`
`R1-081424
`
`Nokia, Nokia Siemens
`25213CR0092 (Rel-7, F) Range of E-DCH amplitude ratios with
`Networks
`QPSK
`Nokia, Nokia Siemens
`25213CR0093 (Rel-8, A) Range of E-DCH amplitude ratios with
`R1-081425
`
`Networks
`QPSK
`The documents were presented by Antti Hiltunen from Nokia and clarify how high amplitude ratios UEs not sustaining
`16QAM must support.
`
`
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Documents are noted. CRs shall be revised in R1-081628 and are for email approval until Friday 11th April.
`
`
`
`25.213 CR0094r1 (Rel-7, F) Restricted Beta Factor
`R1-081617
`Combinations for UL 16QAM
`The document was presented by Johan Bergman from Ericsson
`
`Ericsson
`
`(R1-081514)
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted. The CR is agreed in principle (wording issue) in R1-081629 and shall be merged with
`Nokia, NSN CR in R1-081628.
`
`
`
`R1-081613
`
`25214CR0481R1 (Rel-7, F) CPC DTX cycle change clarification
`
`Nokia, Nokia Siemens
`Networks, Alcatel-Lucent
`Nokia, Nokia Siemens
`R1-081614
`25214CR0482R1 (Rel-8, A) CPC DTX cycle change clarification
`(R1-081427)
`Networks, Alcatel-Lucent
`The document was presented by Antti Hiltunen from Nokia and intends for better description of the Uplink DPCCH burst
`pattern when the DTX cycle changes during an Uplink DPCCH burst.
`
`(R1-081426)
`
`Discussion (Question / Comment):
`Decision: Document is noted. CRs shall be revised in R1-081630
`
`Friday 4th
`
`14 14
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1019, Page 14
`
`

`

`3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53
`Kansas City, USA, 5 – 9 May, 2008
`
`
`
`
`CPC DTX cycle change clarification
`R1-081630
`Decision: Document is agreed.
`
`
`
`R1-081711
`
`Nokia, Nokia Siemens
`Networks, Alcatel-Lucent
`
`(R1-081613)
`(R1-081614)
`
`R1-081598
`
`25.212 CR0263 (Rel-7, F) Clarification to number of HS-PDSCH
`codes in HS-SCCH less operations
`25.212 CR0264 (Rel-8, F) Clarification to number of HS-PDSCH
`R1-081599
`codes in HS-SCCH less operations
`CR category in Rel-8 shall be A instead of F.
`
`InterDigital
`Communications LLC
`InterDigital
`Communications LLC
`
`(R1-081268)
`
`(R1-081268)
`
`The document was presented by Eldad Zeira from InterDigital and is an attempt making the interpretation of the specs
`much better, regarding the number of HS-PDS