`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper: 34
`Entered: September 10, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
` HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01471 (Patent 8,412,197 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01474 (Patent 8,639,246 B2)
` Case IPR2017-01475 (Patent 8,996,003 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, and
`JOHN F. HORVATH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HORVATH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Irene I. Yang
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our discretion
`to issue one Order to be docketed in each case. The parties, however, are
`not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01471 (Patent 8,412,197 B2)
`IPR2017-01474 (Patent 8,639,246 B2)
`IPR2017-01475 (Patent 8,996,003 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner has filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of Irene I.
`Yang in each of the above-identified proceedings. Paper 37.2 Each motion
`is supported by a declaration from Ms. Yang. Ex. 2016. Patent Owner avers
`that Petitioner does not oppose the motions. Paper 37, 1.
`We have reviewed Patent Owner’s motions and Ms. Yang’s
`declarations in each of the proceedings, and determine that the requirements
`of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit Ms.
`Yang pro hac vice.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is therefore
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`Irene I. Yang in each proceeding identified above is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Yang is authorized to appear as
`back-up counsel for Patent Owner in each proceeding, but may not act as
`lead counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in each proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Yang is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations;
`
`
`2 We cite to the paper and exhibit filed in IPR2017-01471. Substantially
`similar papers and exhibits were filed in each of the inter partes review
`proceedings identified in the caption and to which this Order applies.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01471 (Patent 8,412,197 B2)
`IPR2017-01474 (Patent 8,639,246 B2)
`IPR2017-01475 (Patent 8,996,003 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Yang is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file an updated
`mandatory notice in each proceeding, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3),
`providing updated information regarding back-up counsel.
`
`PETITIONER:
`Kevin P.B. Johnson
`Marissa Ducca
`Brian Mack
`QUINN EMANUAL URQUHART & SULLIVAN
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`marissaducca@quinnemanuel.com
`brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Samuel A. Dillon
`Michael J. Bettinger
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`HuaweiSamsungIPRSidley@sidley.com
`jkushan@sidley.com
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`samuel.dillon@sidley.com
`mbettinger@sidley.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
