throbber
PCT
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCvr)
`WO 99/12587
`
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`Jntema.tional Bureau
`
`(51) International Patent Classification 6 :
`A61M 1n2
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`
`Al
`
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`18 March 1999 (18.03.99)
`
`(81) Designated States: AL, AM, AT, AU, AZ. BA, BB, BG, BR,
`BY, CA, CH, CN, CU, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, Fl, GB, GE,
`GH, GM, HR, HU, ID, IL, IS, JP, KE, KG, KP, KR, KZ,
`LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LV, MD, MG, MK, MN, MW,
`MX, NO, NZ, PL. PT, RO, RU, SD, SE, SG, SI, SK, SL,
`TJ, TM, TR, TT, UA, UG, US, UZ, YN, YU, ZW, ARIPO
`patent (GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, SD, SZ, UG, ZW), Eurasian
`patent (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European
`patent (AT, llE, CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, Fl, FR, GB, GR,
`IE, IT, LU, MC, NL, PT. SE), OAPI patent (BF, BJ, CF,
`CG, Cl, CM, GA, GN, GW, ML, MR. NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published
`With international search report.
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCf/ A U98/00725
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`7 September 1998 (07.09.98)
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`PO 9027
`
`S September 1997 (05.09.97)
`
`AU
`
`(71) Applicant~ (for ali designated States except US): CORTRONIX
`PTY. LTD. [AU/AU]; II Technology Drive, Labrador, QLD
`4215 (AU). UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY
`[AU/AU); I Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007 (AU).
`
`(72) Inventors; and
`(75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): WOODARD, John,
`Campbell [AU/AU]; 27 Wareemba Avenue, Thomleigh,
`NSW 2120 (AU). WATTERSON, Peter, Andrew [AU/AU];
`13 Driver Street, West Ryde, NSW 2114 (AU). TANSLEY,
`Geoffrey, Douglas [AU/AU]; 17 Lennox Street, Norman(cid:173)
`hurst, NSW 2076 (AU).
`
`(74) Agent: WALLINGTON- DUMMER; P.O. Box 297, Ry(cid:173)
`dalmere, NSW 1701 (AU).
`
`(54) Title: A ROTARY PUMP WITH HYDRODYNAMICALLY SUSPENDED IMPELLER
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`A pump assembly (1, 33, 200) adapted for
`continuous flow pumping of blood. In a particular fo1m
`the pump (I, 200) is a centrifugal pump wherein the
`impeller (100, 204) is entirely sealed within the pump
`housing (2, 201) and is hydrodynamically suspended
`therein as the impeller rotates within the fluid (105)
`urged by electromagnetic means extemal to the pump
`cavi ty (106, 203). Hydrodynamic suspension is assisted
`by the impeller (100, 204) having deformities therein
`such as blades (8) with tapered surfaces at leading edges
`(102, 223) and trailing edges (1 03, 224) of bottom and
`top edges (221, 222) thereof.
`
`5
`
`I
`
`I~ I
`
`PAGE 1 OF 52
`
`PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT 1112
`
`

`

`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international applications under the PCT.
`
`AL
`AM
`AT
`AU
`AZ
`BA
`BB
`BE
`BF
`BG
`BJ
`BR
`BY
`CA
`CF
`CG
`CH
`CI
`CM
`CN
`cu
`cz
`DE
`DK
`EE
`
`Albania
`Annenia
`Austria
`Australia
`Azerbaijan
`Bosnia and Herzegovina
`Barbados
`Belgium
`Burkina Faso
`Bulgaria
`Benin
`Brazil
`Belarus
`Canada
`Central African Republic
`Congo
`Switzerland
`Cote d'Tvoire
`Cameroon
`China
`Cuba
`Czech Republic
`Gennany
`Denmark
`Estonia
`
`ES
`FI
`FR
`GA
`GB
`GE
`GH
`GN
`GR
`HU
`IE
`IL
`IS
`IT
`JP
`KE
`KG
`KP
`
`KR
`KZ
`LC
`LI
`LK
`LR
`
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Ghana
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Israel
`Iceland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgyzstan
`Democratic People's
`Republic of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakstan
`Saint Lucia
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`
`LS
`LT
`LU
`LV
`MC
`MD
`MG
`MK
`
`ML
`MN
`MR
`MW
`MX
`NE
`NL
`NO
`NZ
`PL
`PT
`RO
`RU
`so
`SE
`SG
`
`Lesotho
`Lithuania
`Luxembourg
`Latvia
`Monaco
`Republic of Moldova
`Madagascar
`'Tite former Yugoslav
`Republic of Macedonia
`Mali
`Mongolia
`Mauritania
`Malawi
`Mexico
`Niger
`Netherlands
`Norway
`New Zealand
`Poland
`Portugal
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Sudan
`Sweden
`Singapore
`
`SI
`SK
`SN
`sz
`TO
`TG
`TJ
`TM
`TR
`TT
`UA
`UG
`us
`uz
`VN
`YU
`zw
`
`Slovenia
`Slovakia
`Senegal
`Swaziland
`Chad
`Togo
`Tajikistan
`Turkmenistan
`Turkey
`Trinidad and Tobago
`Ukraine
`Uganda
`United States of America
`Uzbekistan
`VietNam
`Yugoslavia
`Zimbabwe
`
`PAGE 2 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`A ROTARY PUMP WITH HYDRODYNAMICALLY SUSPENDED IMPELLER
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to rotary pumps adapted, but not
`exclusively, for use as artificial hearts or ventricular
`assist devices and,
`in particular, discloses in preferred
`forms a seal-less shaft-less pump featuring open or closed
`(shrouded) impeller blades with the edges of the blades used
`as hydrodynamic thrust bearings and with electromagnetic
`torque provided by the interaction between magnets embedded
`in the blades and a rotating current pattern generated in
`wires fixed relative to the pump housing.
`
`BACKGROUND ART
`This
`invention relates to the art of continuous or
`pulsatile
`flow
`rotary
`pumps
`and,
`in particular,
`to
`electrically driven pumps suitable for use although not
`exclusively as an artificial heart or ventricular assist
`device. For permanent implantation in a human patient, such
`pumps should ideally have the following characteristics: no
`leakage of fluids into or from the bloodstream; no wearing
`parts; minimum residence time of blood in pump to avoid
`thrombosis (clotting) ; minimum shear stress on blood to avoid
`blood cell damage such as haemolysis; maximum efficiency to
`maximise battery duration and minimise blood heating; and
`absolute reliability.
`Several of these characteristics are very difficult to
`meet in a conventional pump configuration including a seal,
`i.e. with an impeller mounted on a shaft which penetrates a
`wall of the pumping cavity, as exemplified by the blood pumps
`referred to in U.S. Pat. No. 3,957,389 to Rafferty et al.,
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,625,712
`to Wampler, and U.S. Pat. No.
`5,275,580 to Yamazaki. Two main disadvantages of such pumps
`are firstly that the seal needed on the shaft may leak,
`especially after wear, and secondly that the rotor of the
`motor providing the shaft torque remains to be supported, with
`mechanical bearings such as ball-bearings precluded due to
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2 0
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 3 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT/AU98/00725
`
`-2-
`
`Some designs, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,625,712 to
`wear.
`Wampler and U.S. Pat. No. 4, 908, 012 to Moise et al., have
`overcome these problems simultaneously by combining the seal
`and the bearing into one hydrodynamic bearing, but in order
`to prevent long residence times they have had to introduce
`means to continuously supply a blood-compatible bearing purge
`fluid via a percutaneous tube.
`In seal-less designs, blood is permitted to flow through
`the gap in the motor, which is usually of the
`DC
`type, i.e. comprising a rotor including permanent magnets and
`a stator in which an electric current pattern is made to
`rotate synchronously with the rotor.
`Such designs can be
`classified according to the means by which the rotor is
`suspended: contact bearings, magnetic bearings or hydrodynamic
`bearings, though some designs use two of these means.
`Contact or pivot bearings, as exemplified by U.S. Pat.
`No. 5527159 to Bozeman et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 53990.74 to
`Nose et al., have potential problems due to wear, and cause
`very high localised heating and shearing of the blood, which
`can cause deposition and denaturation of plasma proteins, with
`the risk of embolisation and bearing seizure.
`Magnetic bearings, as exemplified by U.S. Pat. No.
`5,350,283 to Nakazeki et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,326,344 to Bramm
`et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,779,614 to Moise et al., offer
`contactless suspension, but require rotor position measurement
`and active control of electric current for stabilisation of
`the position
`in at
`least one direction, according
`to
`Earnshaw's theorem. Position measurement and feedback control
`introduce significant complexity, increasing the failure risk.
`Power use by the control current implies reduced overall
`efficiency. Furthermore, size, mass, component count and cost
`are all increased.
`US Pat. No. 5,507,629 to Jarvik claims to have found a
`configuration circumventing Earnshaw's Theorem and
`thus
`requiring only passive magnetic bearings, but this is doubtful
`and contact axial bearings are
`included
`in any case.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 4 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-3-
`
`Similarly, passive radial magnetic bearings and a pivot point
`are employed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,503 to Yamane.
`employing
`Prior
`to
`the present
`invention,
`pumps
`hydrodynamic suspension, such as US Pat. No. 5,211,546 to
`Isaacson et al. and US Pat. No. 5,324,177 to Golding et al.,
`have used journal bearings, in which radial suspension is
`provided by the fluid motion between two cylinders in relative
`rotation, an inner cylinder lying within and slightly off axis
`to
`a
`slightly
`larger diameter outer cylinder.
`Axial
`suspension is provided magnetically in US Pat. No. 5,324,177
`and by either a contact bearing or a hydrodynamic thrust
`bearing in US Pat. No. 5,211,546.
`A purging flow is needed through the journal bearing, a
`high shear region, in order to remove dissipated heat and to
`prevent long fluid residence time.
`It would be inefficient
`to pass all the fluid through the bearing gap, of small
`cross-sectional area, as this would demand an excessive
`pressure drop across the bearing.
`Instead a leakage path is
`generally provided from the high pressure pump outlet, through
`the bearings and back to the low pressure pump inlet, implying
`a small reduction in outflow and pumping efficiency. US Pat.
`No. 5,324,177 provides a combination of additional means to
`increase the purge flow, namely helical grooves in one of the
`bearing surfaces, and a small additional set of impellers.
`US Pat. No. 5,211,546 provides 10 embodiments with
`various locations of cylindrical bearing surfaces. One of
`these embodiments,
`the third,
`features a single
`journal
`bearing and a contact axial bearing.
`Embodiments of the present invention offer a relatively
`low cost and/or relatively low complexity means of suspending
`the rotor of a seal-less blood pump,
`thereby overcoming or
`ameliorating the problems of existing devices mentioned above.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`According to one aspect of the present invention, there
`is disclosed a rotary blood pump with impeller suspended
`hydrodynamically by thrust forces generated on the edges of
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2 0
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 5 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-4-
`
`the impeller blades. The blade edges are shaped such that the
`gap between the edges and the housing at the leading edge is
`greater than at the trailing edge and thus the fluid which is
`drawn through the gap experiences a wedge shaped restriction
`which generates a thrust away from the housing, as described
`in Reynold's theory of lubrication.
`In preferred embodiments of the invention, the pump is
`of centrifugal or mixed flow type with impeller blades open
`on both the front and back faces of the housing. At least one
`face of the housing is made conical, in order that the thrust
`perpendicular to it has a radial component, which provides a
`radial restoring force
`to a
`radial displacement of
`the
`impeller axis. Similarly, an axial displacement toward either
`the front or the back face increases the thrust from that face
`and reduces the thrust from the other face. Thus the sum of
`the forces on the impeller due to inertia (within limits),
`gravity and any bulk radial or axial hydrodynamic force on the
`impeller can be countered by a restoring force from the thrust
`bearings after a small displacement of the impeller within the
`housing relative to the housing in either a radial or axial
`direction.
`In the preferred embodiment, the impeller driving torque
`derives
`from
`the magnetic
`interaction between permanent
`magnets within the blades of the impeller and oscillating
`currents in windings encapsulated in the pump housing.
`In a second embodiment of the invention, the principle
`is applied in a pump of axial
`type. Within a uniform
`cylindrical section of the pump housing, tapered blade edges
`form a radial hydrodynamic bearing.
`If the pump housing is
`made with reducing radius at the two ends,
`then the end
`hydrodynamic thrust forces have an axial component which can
`provide the axial bearing. Alternatively, magnetic forces or
`other means can provide the axial bearing.
`In a
`further broad form of
`the
`invention there is
`provided a rotary blood pump having an impeller suspended
`hydrodynamically by thrust forces generated by the impeller
`during movement in use of the impeller.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3 0
`
`3 5
`
`PAGE 6 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-5-
`
`Preferably said thrust forces are generated by blades of
`said impeller or by deformities therein.
`More preferably said thrust forces are generated by edges
`of said blades of said impeller.
`Preferably said edges of said blades are tapered.
`In an alternative preferred form said pump is of axial
`type.
`Preferably within a uniform cylindrical section of the
`pump housing, tapered blade edges form a radial hydrodynamic
`bearing.
`Preferably the pump housing is made with reducing radius
`at the two ends, and wherein the end hydrodynamic thrust
`forces have an axial component which can provide the axial
`bearing.
`Preferably magnetic forces or other means can provide the
`axial bearing.
`In a further broad form invention there is provided a
`rotary blood pump having a housing within which an impeller
`acts by
`rotation about an axis
`to cause
`a pressure
`differential between an inlet side of a housing of said pump
`and an outlet side of the housing of said pump; said impeller
`suspended hydrodynamically by thrust forces generated by the
`impeller during movement in use of the impeller.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`invention will now be
`Embodiments of
`the present
`described, with reference
`to
`the accompanying drawings,
`wherein:
`longitudinal cross-sectional view of a
`Fig. 1 is a
`preferred embodiment of the invention;
`Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken generally along
`the line z-z of Fig. 1;
`Fig. 3A is a cross-sectional view of an impeller blade
`taken generally along the line A-A of Fig. 2;
`Fig. 3B is an enlargement of the blade-pump housing
`interface portion of Fig. 3A;
`Fig. 3C is an alternative impeller blade shape;
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 7 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-6-
`
`Figs. 4A, B, C illustrate various possible locations of
`magnet material within a blade;
`Fig. 5 is a left-hand end view of a possible winding
`geometry taken generally along the line 8-8 of Fig. 1;
`Fig. 6 is a diagrammatic cross sectional view of an
`alternative embodiment of the invention as an axial pump;
`Fig .. 7 is an exploded, perspective view of a centrifugal
`pump assembly according to a
`further embodiment of
`the
`invention;
`Fig. 8 is a perspective view of the impeller of the
`assembly of Fig. 7;
`Fig. 9 is a perspective, cut away view of the impeller
`of Fig. 8 within the pump assembly of Fig. 7;
`Fig. 10 is a side section indicative view of the impeller
`of Fig. 8;
`Fig. 11 is a detailed view in side section of edge
`portions of the impeller of Fig. 10;
`Fig. 12 is a block diagram of an electronic driver
`circuit for the pump assembly of Fig. 7;
`Fig. 13 is a graph of head versus flow for the pump
`assembly of Fig. 7;
`Fig.. 14 is a graph of pump efficiency versus flow for the
`pump assembly of Fig. 7;
`Fig. 15 is a graph of electrical power consumption versus
`flow for the pump assembly of Fig. 7;
`Fig. 16 is a plan, section view of the pump assembly
`showing
`a volute arrangement according
`to a preferred
`embodiment;
`Fig. 17 is a plan, section view of a pump assembly
`showing an alternative volute arrangement;
`Fig. 18 is a plan view of an impeller according to a
`further embodiment of the invention;
`Fig. 19 is a plan view of an impeller according to a
`further embodiment of the invention;
`Fig. 20 is a perspective view of an impeller according
`to a further embodiment of the invention.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 8 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT/AU98/00725
`
`-7-
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`The pump assemblies according
`to various preferred
`embodiments
`to be described below all have particular,
`although not exclusive, application for implantation in a
`mammalian body so as to at least assist, if not take over, the
`function of
`the mammalian heart.
`In practice this is
`performed by placing the pump assembly entirely within the
`body of the mammal and connecting the pump between the left
`ventricle and the aorta so as to assist left side heart
`function. It may also be connected to the right ventricle and
`pulmonary artery to assist the right side of the heart.
`In this instance the pump assembly includes an impeller
`which is fully sealed within the pump body and so does not
`require a shaft extending through the pump body to support it.
`The impeller is suspended, in use, within the pump body by,
`at least, the operation of hydrodynamic forces imparted as a
`result of the interaction between the rotating impeller, the
`internal pump walls and the fluid which the impeller causes
`to be urged from an inlet of the pump assembly to an outlet
`thereof.
`the
`is
`invention
`the
`embodiment of
`A preferred
`centrifugal pump 1, as depicted in Figs. 1 and 2, intended for
`implantation into a human, in which case the fluid referred
`to below is blood. The pump housing 2, can be fabricated in
`two parts, a front part 3 in the form of a housing body and
`a back part 4 in the form of a housing cover, with a smooth
`join therebetween, for example at 5 in Fig. 1. The pump 1 has
`an axial inlet 6 and a tangential outlet 7. The rotating part
`100 is of very simple form, comprising only blades 8 and a
`support cone 9 to hold those blades fixed relative to each
`other. The blades may be curved as depicted in Fig. 2, or
`straight, in which case they can be either radial or tilted,
`i.e. at an angle to the radius. This rotating part 100 will
`hereafter be called the impeller 100, but it also serves as
`a bearing component and as the rotor of a motor configuration
`as to be further described below whereby a torque is applied
`by electromagnetic means to the impeller 100. Note that the
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 9 OF 52
`
`

`

`WO 99/12587
`
`PCT/AU98/00725
`
`-8-
`
`impeller has no shaft and that the fluid enters the impeller
`from the region of its axis RR.
`Some of the fluid passes in
`front of the support cone 9 and some behind it, so that the
`pump 1 can be considered of two-sided open type, as compared
`to conventional open centrifugal pumps, which are only open
`on the front side. Approximate dimensions found adequate for
`the pump 1 to perform as a ventricular assist device, when
`operating at speeds in the range 2,000 rpm to 4,000 rpm, are
`outer blade diameter 40 mm, outer housing average diameter 60
`mm, and housing axial length 40 mm.
`As the blades 8 move within the housing, some of the
`fluid passes through the gaps, much exaggerated in Figs. 1 and
`3, between the blade edges 101 and the housing front face 10
`and housing back face 11.
`In all open centrifugal pumps, the
`gaps are made small because this leakage flow lowers the pump
`hydrodynamic efficiency.
`In the pump disclosed in this
`embodiment,
`the gaps are made slightly smaller
`than is
`conventional in order that the leakage flow can be utilised
`to create a hydrodynamic bearing. For the hydrodynamic forces
`to be sufficient, the blades must also be tapered as depicted
`in Figs. 3A and 3B 1
`so that the gap 104 is larger at the
`leading edge 102 of the blade 8 than at the trailing edge 103.
`The fluid 105 which passes through the gap thus experiences
`a wedge shaped restriction which generates a
`as
`thrust 1
`described
`in Reynolds'
`theory of
`lubrication
`(see,
`for
`example 1 "Modern Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 1 Incompressible Flow",
`by N. Curle and H.J. Davies, Van Nostrand, 1968). The thrust
`is proportional to the square of the blade thickness at the
`edge, and
`thus thick blades are favoured, since if the
`proportion of the pump cavity filled by blades is constant,
`then the net thrust force will be inversely proportional to
`the number of blades. However, the blade edges can be made
`to extend as tails from thin blades as depicted in Fig. 3C in
`order to increase the blade area adjacent the walls.
`In one particular form, the tails join adjacent blades
`so as
`to form a complete shroud with wedges or tapers
`incorporated therein. An example of a shroud design as well
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 10 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT/AU98/00725
`
`-9-
`
`as other variations on the blade structure will be described
`later in this specification.
`For manufacturing simplicity, the housing front face 10
`can be made conical, with an angle of around 45° so that
`provides both axial and radial hydrodynamic forces. Other
`angles are suitable that achieve the functional requirements
`of this pump including the requirements for both axial and
`radial hydrodynamic forces.
`Other curved surfaces are possible provided both axial
`and radial hydrodynamic forces can be produces as a res~lt of
`rotation of the blades relative to the housing surfaces.
`The housing back face 11 can include a roughly conical
`extension 12 pointing into the pump cavity 106, to eliminate
`or minimise the effect of the flow stagnation point on the
`axis of the back housing.
`Alternatively extension 12 can resemble an impeller eye
`to make the flow mixed.
`for manufacturing
`embodiment,
`In
`this preferred
`simplicity and for uniformity in the flow axial direction RR,
`the housing back face 11 is made flat over the bearing
`surfaces, i.e. under the blade edges. With this the case, a
`slacker tolerance on the alignment between the axes of the
`front part 3 and back part 4 of the housing 2 is permissible.
`An alternative is to make the back face 11 conical at the
`bearing surfaces, with taper in the opposite direction to the
`front face 10, so that the hydrodynamic forces from the back
`face will also have radial components. Tighter tolerance on
`the axes alignment would then be required, and some of the
`flow would have to undergo a reversal in its axial direction.
`Again a roughly conical extension (like 12) will be needed.
`There may be some advantage in making the housing surfaces and
`blade edges non-straight, with varying tangent angle, although
`this will impose greater manufacturing complexity.
`There are several options for the shape of the taper, but
`in the preferred embodiment the amount of material removed
`simply varies linearly or approximately linearly across the
`blade. For the back face, the resulting blade edges are then
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 11 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-10-
`
`planes at a slight inclination to the back face.
`For the
`front face, the initial blade edges are curved and the taper
`only removes a relatively small amount of material so they
`still appear curved. Alternative taper shapes can include a
`step in the blade edge, though the corner in that step would
`represent a stagnation line posing a thrombosis risk.
`For a given minimum gap, at the trailing blade edge, the
`hydrodynamic force is maximal if the gap at the leading edge
`is approximately double that at the trailing edge. Thus the
`taper, which equals the leading edge gap minus the trailing
`edge gap, should be chosen to match a nominal minimum gap,
`once the impeller has shifted towards that edge. Dimensions
`which have been found to give adequate thrust forces are a
`taper of around 0.05 mm for a nominal minimum gap of around
`0.05 mm, and an average circumferential blade edge thickness
`of around 5 mm for 4 blades. For the front face, the taper
`is measured within the plane perpendicular to the axis. The
`axial length of the housing between the front and back faces
`at any position should then be made about 0.2 mm greater than
`the axial length of the blade, when it is coaxial with the
`housing,· so that the minimum gaps are both about 0. 1 mm
`axially when the impeller 100 is centrally positioned within
`the housing 2.
`Then, for example, if the impeller shifts
`axially by 0.05 mm,
`the minimum gaps will be 0.05 mm at one
`face and 0.15 mm at the other face. The thrust increases with
`decreasing gap and would be much larger from the 0.05 mm gap
`than from the 0.15 mm gap, about 14 times larger for the above
`dimensions. Thus there is a net restoring force away from the
`smaller gap.
`Similarly, for radial shifts of the impeller the radial
`component of the thrust from the smaller gap on the conical
`housing front face would offer the required restoring radial
`force or from the hub. The axial component of that force and
`its torque on the impeller would have to be balanced by an
`axial force and torque from the housing back face, and so the
`impeller will also have to shift axially and tilt its axis to
`be no longer parallel with the housing axis.
`Thus as the
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 12 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-11-
`
`person moves and the pump is accelerated by external forces,
`the
`impeller will continually shift
`its position and
`alignment, varying the gaps in such a way that the total force
`and torque on the impeller 100 match that demanded by inertia.
`The gaps are so small, however,
`that
`the variation in
`hydrodynamic efficiency will be small, and the pumping action
`of the blades will be approximately the same as when the
`impeller is centrally located.
`While smaller gaps imply greater hydrodynamic efficiency
`and greater bearing thrust forces, smaller gaps also demand
`tighter manufacturing tolerances, increase frictional drag on
`the impeller, and impose greater shear stress on the fluid.
`Taking these points in turn, for the above 0.05 mm
`and
`gaps, tolerances of around ±0. 015 mm are needed, which imposes
`some cost penalty but is achievable. A tighter tolerance is
`difficult, especially if the housing is made of a plastic,
`given the changes in dimension caused by temperature and
`possible absorption of fluid by plastic. The frictional drag
`for the above gaps produces negligible torque compared to the
`typical motor torque. Finally, to estimate the shear stress,
`consider a rotation speed of 3,000 rpm and a typical radius
`of 15 mm, at which the blade speed is 4.7 ms- 1 and the average
`velocity shear for an average gap of 0.075 mm is 6.2 x 10 4
`For blood of dynamic viscosity 3. 5 x 10- 3 kgm- 1 s- 1
`the average
`shear stress would be 220 Nm- 2
`• Other prototype centrifugal
`blood pumps with closed blades have found that slightly larger
`gaps, e.g. 0.15 mm, are acceptable for haemolysis. A major
`advantage of the open blades of the present invention is that
`a fluid element that does pass through a blade edge gap will
`have very short residence time in that gap, around 2 x 10- 3 s,
`and the fluid element will most likely be swept though the
`pump without passing another blade edge.
`To minimise the net force required of the hydrodynamic
`bearings, the net axial and radial hydrodynamic forces on the
`impeller from the bulk fluid flow should be minimised, where
`"bulk" here means other than from the bearing thrust surfaces.
`One method of minimising the bulk radial hydrodynamic
`
`,
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 13 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-12-
`
`force is to use straight radial blades so that pressure acting
`on the blade sides has virtually no radial component.
`The
`radial force on the impeller depends critically on the shape
`of the output flow collector or volute 13. The shape should
`be designed to minimise the radial impeller force over the
`desired range of
`pump speeds, without excessively lowering
`the pump efficiency. The optimal shape will have a roughly
`helical perimeter between the "tongue" and out
`The radial
`force can also be reduced by the introduction of an internal
`division in the volute 13 to create a second output flow
`collector passage, with tongue approximately diametrically
`opposite to the tongue of the first passage.
`An indicative plan view of impeller 100 relative to
`housing 2 is shown having a concentric volute 13.
`Fig. 17 illustrates the alternative volute arrangement
`comprising a split volute created by volute barrier 107 which
`causes volute 108 in a first hemisphere of the housing 2 to
`split into first half volute 109 and second half volute 110
`over the second hemisphere.
`The hemispheres are defined
`respectively on each side of a diameter of the housing 2 which
`passes through or near exit point 111 of outlet 7.
`In alternative forms concentric volutes can be utilised,
`particularly where specific speed is relatively low.
`In a further particular form a vaneless diffuser may also
`reduce the radial force.
`In regard to the bulk axial hydrodynamic axial force, if
`the blade cross-section is made uniform in the axial direction
`along the retational axis, apart from the conical front edge,
`then the pressure acting on the blade surface (excluding the
`bearing edges) will have no axial component.
`This also
`simplifies the blade manufacture. The blade support cone 9
`must then be shaped to minimise axial thrust on the impeller
`and minimise disturbance to the flow over the range of speeds,
`while maintaining sufficient strength to prevent relative
`blade movement. The key design parameter affecting the axial
`force is the angle of the cone. The cone is drawn in Fig. 1
`as having the same internal diameter as the blades, which may
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 14 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT I A U98/00725
`
`-13-
`
`aid manufacture. However, the cone could be made with larger
`or smaller internal diameter to the blades. There may be
`advantage in using a non-axisymmetric support "cone", e.g.
`with larger radius on the trailing surface of a blade than the
`radius at the leading surface of the next blade.
`If the
`blades are made with non-uniform cross section to increase
`hydrodynamic efficiency,
`then any bulk hydrodynamic axial
`force on them can be balanced by shaping the support cone to
`produce an opposite bulk hydrodynamic axial force on it.
`Careful
`design
`of
`the
`entire
`pump,
`employing
`computational fluid dynamics, is necessary to determine the
`optimal shapes of the blades 8, the volute 13, the support
`cone 9 and the housing 2, in order to maximise hydrodynamic
`efficiency while keeping the bulk fluid hydrodynamic forces,
`shear and residence times
`low. All edges and the joins
`between .the blades and the support cone should be smoothed.
`The means of providing the driving torque on the impeller
`100 of
`the preferred embodiment of
`the
`invention is to
`encapsulate permanent magnets 14
`in the blades 8 of the
`impeller 100 and to drive them with a rotating magnetic field
`pattern from oscillating currents in windings 15 and 16, fixed
`relative to the housing 2. Magnets of high remanence such as
`sintered rare-earth magnets should be used to maximise motor
`efficiency.
`The magnets should be aligned axially or
`approximately axially, with alternating polarity for adjacent
`blades. Thus there must be an even number of blades. Since
`low blade number is preferred for the bearing force, and since
`two blades would not have sufficient bearing stiffness to
`rotation about an axis through the blades and perpendicular
`to the pump housing (unless the blades are very curved), four
`blades are recommended.
`A higher number of blades, for
`example 6 or 8 will also work.
`Some possible options for locating the magnets 14 within
`the blades 8 are shown in Fig. 4. The most preferred which
`is depicted in Fig. 4A,
`for the blade to be made of magnet
`material apart from a biocompatible shell or coating to
`prevent fluid corroding the magnets and to prevent magnet
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`PAGE 15 OF 52
`
`

`

`wo 99/12587
`
`PCT/AU98/00725
`
`-14-
`
`thickness
`
`is approximately 1
`
`material (which is toxic for rare earth magnets) entering the
`blood stream. The coating should also be sufficiently durable
`especially at blade corners to withstand rubbing during
`start-up or during inadvertent bearing touch down.
`In one particular form the inside walls of the pump
`housing 2 are also coated with a biologically compatible and
`wear resistant material such as diamond coating or titanium
`nitride so that wear on both of the touching surfaces is
`minimised.
`An acceptable coating
`micron.
`A suitable impeller manufacturing method is to die-press
`the ent

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket