throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 22
` Entered: December 19, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ROQUETTE FRERES, S.A.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TATE & LYLE INGREDIENTS AMERICAS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01506
`Patent 7,608,436 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN,
`and JACQUELINE T. HARLOW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`Correction of Clerical Error in Decision to Institute
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01506
`Patent 7,608,436 B2
`
`
`
`On November 30, 2017, we entered a decision instituting trial on
`claims 1–4, 15–29, 31, and 32 of U.S. Patent No. 7,608,436 B2 (“the ‘’436
`patent). Paper 18 (“Decision” or “Dec.”). On December 14, 2017,
`Petitioner filed a Request for Rehearing of our Decision (Paper 20) that
`points out a clerical error in our Decision.
`Specifically, as Petitioner points out, on page 2 of the Decision we
`ordered trial to proceed on “claims 1–4, 15–29, 31, and 32 of the ’436
`patent” Paper 20 (citing Dec. 2). The Order section on page 14 failed to
`include claims 19–22 as provided in the holding on page 2 of the Decision.
`Accordingly, we correct that error as follows: On page 14 of the Decision,
`the indented material identified by the numeral (3) is corrected as follows:
`“(3) Whether claims 1–4, 15–29, 31, and 32 of the ’436 patent
`are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combined disclosures of
`Shah, Craig, and Cleland;”.
`No other changes are required. The institution date remains the date
`on which the Decision was entered; namely, November 30, 2017. Dec. 14.
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that the Order section of the Decision entered
`November 30, 2017 (Paper 18) is corrected to comply with this Order;
`FURTHER ORDERED that page 14 of Paper 18 is corrected to reflect
`that the ground based on obviousness over Shah (Ex. 1008), Craig (Ex.
`1009), and Cleland (Ex. 1007) shall proceed on claims 1–4, 15–29, 31,
`and 32 of the ’436 patent to comport with the holding on page 2 of the
`Decision.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01506
`Patent 7,608,436 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David L. Glandorf
`Joseph Evall
`Daniel J. Thomasch
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`dglandorf@gibsondunn.com
`jevall@gibsondunn.com
`dthomasch@gibsondunn.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Paul H. Berghoff
`James V. Suggs
`S. Richard Carden
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`Berghoff@mbhb.com
`Suggs@mbhb.com
`Carden@mbhb.com
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket