throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper: 20
` Entered: October 20, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ROQUETTE FRERES, S.A.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TATE & LYLE INGREDIENTS AMERICAS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01506, Patent 7,608,436 B2
`Case IPR2017-01507, Patent 8,057,840 B21
`____________
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN,
`and JACQUELINE T. HARLOW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Joseph Evall
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`1This decision addresses issues common to both proceedings, therefore, we
`issue a single decision that is entered in both case files. For convenience, we
`refer to papers filed in IPR2017-01506.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01506 (Patent 7,608,436 B2)
`IPR2017-01507 (Patent 8,057,840 B2)
`
`
`On September 18, 2017, Petitioner filed a motion for pro hac vice
`
`admission of Joseph Evall (Paper 9) supported by a declaration of Mr. Evall
`
`(Exhibit 1039). No opposition was filed by Patent Owner. See Paper 5, 2
`
`(citing Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639
`
`(PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (setting a one week time period for filing an
`
`opposition to a motion for pro hac vice admission)). Based on our review of
`
`Petitioner’s motion and Mr. Evall’s declaration, we determine that Petitioner
`
`establishes “good cause” for the admission.
`
`It is:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Mr. Evall is granted; Mr. Evall is authorized to represent Petitioner only as
`
`back-up counsel in the instant proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the instant proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Evall shall comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Evall shall be subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01506 (Patent 7,608,436 B2)
`IPR2017-01507 (Patent 8,057,840 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David Glandorf
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`dglandorf@gibsondunn.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Paul Berghoff
`James Suggs
`Richard Carden
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`berghoff@mbhb.com
`suggs@mbhb.com
`carden@mbhb.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket