throbber

`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 1
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 1
`
`

`

`STATEMENT OF POLICY ON
`RELEASE FOR PUBLICATION OF
`SPE CONFERENCE PAPERS
`
`ANTEC is a forum for discussions of contributions addressing the business,
`engineering and science of plastics.
`
`Selected conference papers and discussions are added to SPE literature through ‘
`publication by the Society in its established periodicals.
`
`All papers submitted to and accepted by the Society for presentation at one of its
`conferences are copyrighted by and are the property of the Society of Plastics
`Engineers. Publication rights are reserved by the Society.
`
`REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED.
`
`An abstract, not to exceed one hundred words, may be published without
`further permission from the Society provided appropriate source credit is
`given to the Society of Plastics Engineers and the conference at which the
`paper was presented.
`
`1.
`
`All papers submitted to and accepted by the Society for presentation at
`one of its conferences are copyrighted by and are the property of the
`Society of Plastics Engineers. Publication rights are reserved by the
`Society.
`
`As soon as practicable after a conference, the Society will contact all
`authors whose papers are being considered for publication in an SPE
`journal or Plastics Engineering.
`
`The Society shall not be responsible for statements or opinions expressed
`in publications, reports, papers or discussions at its meetings unless
`specifically approved by the Council.
`
`COPYRIGHT (O 1999 BY THE SOCIETY OF PLASTICS ENGINEERS,
`PO BOX 403, BROOKFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06804-0403
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 2
`
`

`

`ADVANCES IN THERMOPLASTIC ENCAPSULATION OF
`ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS
`
`Thomas D. Boyer and Mark W. Wichmann
`DuPont Engineering Polymers
`
`Abstract
`
`sensors, motor
`solenoids,
`encapsulating
`For
`recently integrated circuit
`(IC)
`components and most
`modules, manufacturers
`are
`increasingly
`choosing
`engineering
`thennoplastics
`and
`injection molding
`technology over traditional thermoset resins and processing
`methods. After
`reviewing the cost and performance
`advantages of thermoplastic encapsulation technology, this
`paper reports on recent advances that are taking the
`technology imo new areas. The advances include improved
`adhesion
`between
`encapsulated
`object
`and
`the
`encapsulating plastic, new coils that can withstand high
`voltage surges and the encapsulation of electronic circuitry
`to produce new kinds of speed sensors and novel devices
`for data storage and information retrieval.
`
`Introduction
`
`Many electrical and electronic devices are encapsulated
`to provide protection against damage by moisture,
`chemicals or solid materials. The traditional approaches
`have used varnishes or therrnoset resins in either liquid or
`solid form. In the 1990's, however, thermoplastics have
`moved into the forefront for encapsulation.
`The main reasons for the shift are that the use of
`
`thermoplastic injection molding technology results in
`lower production costs,
`improved quality and less
`undesirable environmental impact in the workplace than
`thermoset potting and molding technologies.
`
`Processing and Equipment
`
`The typical thermoplastic encapsulation process is an
`insert injection molding operation. The insert, a coil or an
`integrated circuit for example, is placed in a mold equipped
`with either fixed or retractable pins or other features to
`support
`it when molten thermoplastic is injected. The
`electrical device’s lead wires or terminals are clamped off
`from thermoplastic flow during molding.
`
`Insert injection molding is a clean, repeatable process,
`it
`lends
`itself
`to
`automation
`and
`cellular
`and
`manufacturing. The process fits well with total quality
`management (TQM). With off-the-shelf process controls
`and systematic production methods, manufacturers can
`deliver repeatable, high-quality parts.
`
`Parts come out of the tool ready for assembly. They
`generally do not require costly trimming or deflashing as
`thermoset parts do.
`
`1542 / ANTEC '99
`
`injection molding
`clamp
`horizontal
`Although
`equipment can be used for encapsulation, vertical-clamp
`machines allow easier insert placement and greater insert
`stability during mold clamping movement. For high-
`volume production, a vertical machine with a shuttle or
`rotary table is highly efficient. For example, a two-station
`table fitted with two lower mold halves allows molding at
`one station while an operator or a robot unloads finished
`parts and loads inserts at the other station.
`
`Materials
`
`thermoplastic
`to therrnoset powders,
`In contrast
`encapsulation resins are supplied in the form of dust-free
`pellets. And unlike many liquid and solid therrnoset
`materials, the thermoplastic resins release only negligible
`amounts of volatile organic compounds during processing.
`
`Thermoplastic resins are very stable and thus have
`extended shelf life. By contrast,
`thermoset potting and
`molding compounds generally deteriorate with age and
`oftenrequirerefrigeratedortemperature—controlledstorage.
`
`Two families of thermoplastic polymers are now
`widely used for encapsulation: polyarnides, which are
`commonly
`called
`nylons,
`, and
`polyesters. Most
`encapsulation resins contain glass fiber reinforcement for
`added stiffness, strength and dimensional stability. Flame-
`retardant grades are available to meet requirements for
`UL94V-0performance.
`
`Nylon, polyester and other engineering thermoplastics
`offer more impact
`resistance than typical
`thermoset
`encapsulation resins. Their toughness allows the use of
`thin-wall components and provides improved resistance to
`both vibration and impact damage.
`
`The injection molding process gives the designer the
`freedom to incorporate mounting brackets or other features
`in a single multifunctional part. This can result
`in
`assemblies with reduced part count and lower assembly
`costs. An example is the automotive sensor shown in
`Figure 1. It has insert-molded metal compression limiters,
`thus eliminating the need for a separate mounting bracket.
`
`Nylon polymers are highly valued for their toughness,
`chemical and solvent
`resistance and thermal cycling
`performance. Those most commonly used for encapsulation
`are heat-stabilized grades of nylon 66 and nylon 612 that
`are specially tailored for encapsulation molding.
`
`Encapsulation grades of nylon 66 are firmly entrenched
`as workhorse materials. With proper mold design and
`molding process controls, they give excellent results for
`most part configurations.
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 3
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 3
`
`

`

`For encapsulating sensors or integrated circuit devices,
`nylon 612 resins are often the best choice. Owing to their
`crystallization characteristics,
`they are inherently well-
`suited to relatively slow,
`low-pressure injection. Such
`process conditions are a key factor in the prevention of
`bunching of very fine magnet wire used in variable-
`reluctance sensors or displacement of delicate electronic
`circuit assemblies. Nylon 612 resins also have better
`chemical resistance and lower moisture absorption than
`nylon 66.
`
`Thermoplastic polyesters provide better heat-aging
`performance than nylon 66 or 612, and they also excel in
`stiffness, strength and low moisture absorption. The main
`thermoplastic polyester candidates for encapsulation are
`polyethylene
`terephthalate
`(PET)
`and
`polybutylene
`terephthalate (PBT). In general, PET encapsulation grades
`offer highertemperature resistance in service.
`
`The choice of a particular thermoplastic type or grade
`depends on several interrelated factors. Two key factors
`discussed here are:
`l) long-term product reliability and
`safety, including compliance with national or international
`standards; and 2) requirements for bonding between the
`encapsulation material and the ground insulation.
`
`Reliability and safety
`
`By applying sound design principles and testing
`prototypes before production, manufacturers have developed
`thennoplastic-encapsulated electrical and electronic devices
`that have proven themselves in the field.
`
`For encapsulated solenoids, transformers, motors, etc.
`requiring use of an approved electrical insulation system
`(EIS), manufacturers can turn to material systems that have
`been tested and approved according to Underwriters
`Laboratories (UL) Standard 1446 and the guidelines of
`International
`Electrotechnical
`Commission
`(IEC)
`Publication 85.
`
`The approval of an EIS involves the testing and
`evaluation of the complete assembled insulation system
`(magnet wire, coil form and encapsulation material) under
`conditions indicative of its performance throughout
`its
`projected service life.
`
`Recognition of an insulation system under either UL
`1446 or
`IEC standards requires testing under cyclic
`conditions of heat aging, cold shock, mechanical stress and
`moisture exposure followed by dielectric stress testing. EIS
`tests are very costly in both money and "time. Final
`
`High-temperature nylon (HTN) resins are available for
`applications requiring resistance to higher temperatures
`than other nylons and/or better chemical or hydrolysis
`resistance than polyesters. Typical HTN resins melt at
`about 300°C while nylon 66 melts at 255°C. One HTN
`grade has a UL electrical relative thermal index (RTI) of
`150°C, which is 10°C higher than nylon 66. HTN resins
`absorb less moisture than standard nylons and thus have
`better dimensional stability, but they retain the toughness
`and thermal cycling resistance characteristic other nylons.
`
`ANTEC ’99 / 1543
`
`recognition of a system can take 18 months, and failure to
`gain the required recognition would mean starting all over
`again
`
`It’s no wonder then that most electrical manufacturers
`choose to use systems that have already been tested and
`approved through the efforts of component material
`suppliers. The availability of EIS’s has lent solid support
`to the growth of thermoplastic encapsulation.
`
`Preapproved UL 1446/IEC 85 EIS’s using nylon 66,
`high-temperature nylon or PET as the encapsulant are
`available for Class B (130°C) service at up to 600 V.
`Class F (155°C) and Class H (180°C) 600 V systems
`using PET encapsulant
`are
`also
`available
`and in
`commercial use for encapsulation applications.
`
`It is very important to note that in all UL 1446/IEC
`85 system recognitions, a minimum thickness is specified
`for both the encapsulant and the coil form.
`
`Encapsulated automotive components such as sensors
`must withstand repeated thermal cycling in the -40 to
`+150°C range. Nylon 66 and 612 and HTN resins
`generally excel in thermal cycling performance.
`
`“Wire-friendly” grades of nylon 66 and 612 have been
`developed to meet a special need in automotive sensors.
`Their formulation contains no metal salts, which can
`contribute to electrolytic corrosion of magnet wire. Since
`corrosion of the very fine wire (AWG 35 to 45) used in
`sensors can quickly lead to failure, “wire-friendly” resins
`greatly improve reliability.
`
`Engineering for adhesion
`
`While a mechanical lock between the encapsulant and
`the insert generally provides adequate structural integrity,
`physical adhesion between them provides added protection
`against three phenomena: moisture penetration, separation
`by mechanical stress such as vibration and the formation of
`gaps that would reduce dielectric performance.
`
`The author’s studies show that three factors are critical
`
`for achieving viable adhesion through melt bonding:
`materials, coil form design and accurate melt temperature
`control in the mold.
`
`Selecting materials
`
`for adhesion
`
`Screening tests to evaluate the relative bond strength
`achieved with various glass-reinforced nylon resins show
`that
`like materials achieve better bonds than dissimilar
`ones and that nylon 612 provides the best bonds of all the
`resins evaluated. Figure 2 shows the results for several
`promising combinations of materials tested in lap shear
`and finger joints (Figures 3 and 4). Even the material with
`the lowest break strength shown in Figure 2 may provide
`adequate adhesion for many applications.
`
`Designing parts for adhesion
`
`Designing the coil form’s flanges with one or more
`reverse-tapered grooves (Figure 5) increases the reliability
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 4
`
`

`

`area would almost certainly cause failure in the 8 kV surge
`test.
`
`The bobbin for ABB’s coil has molded-in pockets for
`insulation displacement
`(IDC)
`terminals. Their design
`posed a
`tooling
`challenge
`owing
`to warpage,
`a
`characteristic of
`all
`fiber-reinforced
`therrnoplastics.
`Reasoning that warp can be controlled if not eliminated,
`the molder, Empire Precision Plastics, met the challenge
`by configuring the mold in a way that causes the pockets
`to warp into the desired shape and dimensions.
`
`When the coils are wound, the winding machine ties
`off lead wires to temporary posts molded as part of the
`bobbin’s terminal area. The posts are sheared off during
`automated insertion of insulation displacement terminals
`into the pockets.
`
`In molding the bobbins, Empire uses up-to-date
`machine and mold temperature controllers and carefully
`monitors them to maintain process temperatures within the
`range required to achieve full crystallinity throughout the
`part structure.
`
`Parts that will be encapsulated must always be molded
`with full crystallinity. If not, dimensional changes and
`deformation are likely during overmolding.
`
`of achieving a melt bond during encapsulation and
`provides a meclmnical lock as well. The taper should be
`configured as shown in Figure 5, and edge radii should be
`less than 0.13 mm (0.005 in). This configuration provides
`thin edges that, given the right materials and process
`conditions, will soften and fuse with the encapsulant melt.
`The groove surfaces that do not melt will be filled by the
`encapsulant during molding, providing a mechanical lock
`and a longer, more tortuous path for moisture to travel to
`reach the windings.
`
`To get more sealing area than that provided by a
`single groove, manufacturers have begun designing
`bobbins with multiple grooves in a stepped arrangement.
`The coil form shown in Figure 6, for example, has a
`stepped flange with two grooves.
`
`Melt
`
`temperature control
`
`Accurate control of melt temperature in the area where
`bonding is required is cnicial to the bond. This is achieved
`primarily with a combination of mold design and proper
`adjustment of mold temperature control equipment.
`
`Adhesion at
`
`the metal-plastic interface.
`
`Automotive industry studies indicate that the primary
`cause of failure of encapsulated sensors and circuitry with
`lead-frame assemblies is leakage at the plastic-to-metal
`interface. Possible solutions currently under investigation
`include use of a coating on the insert that will bond with
`the encapsulant and/or adding a material to the encapsulant
`that will adhere to the metal lead frame. Initial scouting
`shows promise that we can achieve effective adhesion in
`this critical interface area.
`
`constituents.
`
`For encapsulating the coil, ABB uses a hot runner
`mold, thus demonstrating the feasrbility of using this type
`of tool for encapsulation work.
`In a hot runner mold,
`heating elements are used to keep sprue and runner material
`in the molten state between shots rather than cooling and
`ejecting them along with finished parts. The advantage is
`the elimination of sprue and runner scrap. The challenge of
`hot runner encapsulation molding, which was met in this
`case, is that the process requires faster injection at higher
`pressure than is typically used in encapsulation molding.
`
`Cracking the high-voltage barrier
`
`The coil shown in Figure 6 is a new encapsulated
`voltage coil for electromechanical watt-hour meters from
`ABB Electric Metering and Control. Using heat-stabilized
`nylon 66 with 33% glass fiber reinforcement for its bobbin
`and encapsulation, the new coil replaces an older design
`overrnolded with therrnoset epoxy.
`
`This coil represents a milestone in the high-voltage
`performance of thennoplastic-encapsulatcd coil devices.
`Before installing the coil in a meter, ABB tests each one
`twice at 8kV with a specific wave form simulating a
`powerful lightning surge.
`
`The design of the coil bobbin, the molding techniques
`used to produce it and encapsulation techniques are all
`critical
`to the coil’s high-voltage resistance, consistent
`quality and economical cost.
`
`The bobbin is molded with a deep groove for the
`terminating lead wire. The wire’s placement in the groove
`is a key factor
`in providing sufficient
`isolation for
`satisfactory performance in ABB’s 8 kV surge test. During
`encapsulation, filling and packing of the encapsulant in the
`lead wire groove are crucial. Microvoids or gaps in that
`
`Encapsulating microelectronics
`
`Until recently, the encapsulation of integrated circuit
`(IC) devices involved potting it in a separate case with a
`liquid therrnoset
`resin. Recently, we have
`assisted
`manufacturers
`in
`adapting
`low-cost
`thermoplastic
`technology to the protection of 105.
`
`Medical records on a chip
`
`The familiar metal dog tag worn by the members of
`the US. armed forces may soon give way to a rugged
`plastic tag containing medical records on a memory chip.
`Called the Medi-Tag®,
`the new record carrier was
`developed by Data-Disk Technology Inc., Sterling, Va.
`
`The Medi-Tag® contains a flash memory chip surface-
`mounted on an integrated circuit (IC) board (Figure 7). It’s
`encapsulated with 33% glass-reinforced nylon 612 resin,
`which is ideally suited for slow, low-pressure mold filling,
`a key means of avoiding damage to the tag’s delicate
`electronic circuitry. The resin is also specially formulated
`for
`excellent
`long-term compatibility with
`circuit
`
`1544 /ANTEC ’99
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 5
`
`

`

`a variety of
`chip’s memory can include
`The
`information, including the individual’s complete medical
`history, X-rays, allergies to medications, dental records,
`etc. Medical personnel in the field or at base hospitals
`around the world will be able to read and update the record
`in the Medi-Tag® by inserting it into a slot in a standard
`PCMCIA reader attached to a personal computer.
`
`to issue a
`The US. military’s ultimate plan is
`personal infomiation carrier to all members of the active
`Armed Forces and Reserves. Another very large potential
`use involves their use by retired military personnel and
`their dependents, who look to military facilities for medical
`care.
`
`in miniature
`speed sensors
`Wheel
`A new electronic type of automotive wheel-speed sensor
`(Figure 8) promises lower costs and smaller size than
`conventional
`coil-type
`(variable
`reluctance)
`sensors.
`Developed by the Lucas-Varity Group in the UK, the new
`sensor measures just 25 mm long by 6 mm in diameter (1
`in by 1/4 in.).
`The electronic sensor is mounted on a fixed member
`
`near a rotating part fitted with magnets. It uses either the
`Hall or the magneto resistive effect to generate digital
`
`signals for controlling anti-lock braking,
`shifting or other automotive systems.
`
`transmission
`
`Conclusions
`
`engineering
`using
`technology
`Injection molding
`thermoplastics such as nylons and PET polyesters has
`emerged as the most cost-effective method of encapsulating
`coil devices such as solenoids, sensors and transformers.
`Recent advances include the encapsulation of coils that can
`withstand high-voltage testing and the encapsulation of
`electronic circuitry. The latter may herald the development
`of an array of portable new products for data storage,
`information retrieval and control.
`
`Keywords: Electrical, Electronic, Encapsulation, Sensors
`
`Overmold Adhesion Strength
`
`D Lap shearlowts
`
`§ Fingerlomts
`
`
`
`Figure I: Wheel-speed sensor with molded-in
`compression limiters.
`
`N 01o0
`
`
`
`Breakload.
`
`
`
`The sensor’s electronic components consist of an IC, a
`capacitor and possibly a diode welded to a lead frame
`(Figure 9). A major challenge in encapsulating this
`assembly is to avoid damaging or displacing the unit’s
`delimte electronic circuitry. Displacement is a critical issue
`because precise positioning of the chip within the shell is
`necessary for accurate speed sensing. The challenge is met
`with the use of a glass-reinforced nylon 612 resin. It allows
`the slow,
`low-pressure mold fill at moderate melt
`temperature which is necessary to avoid displacing or
`damaging the delicate electronic assembly.
`
`ANTEC ’99/ 1545
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mod nylon/ Mod nylon/
`Mod. nylon
`Nylon 6l2
`
`Nylon 612/
`Nylon 6l2/
`Ny on 612 Mod. nylon
`Insen/Encapsulant
`
`Nylon 66/
`Nylon 66
`
`NOIE All resrns contain 33% glass fiber reinforcement
`
`Figure 2: Overmold adhesion strength between various
`nylon resins.
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 6
`
`

`

`Figure 3: Lap shearjoim.
`
`Figure 6: Vot'rage coiffor wan-hour meters.
`Encapsulant
`
`
`
`Figure 4: Finger joint.
`
`between coilform and encapsm'am.
`
`Figure 5: Taperedflange design to improve adhesion
`
`1546 iANTEC ’99
`
`Figure 9: J’mema! components ofeieflronic- wheeI—speed
`sensor.
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 7
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1009, pg. 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket