IPR2017-01494, -01539 U.S. Patent No. 7,683,509
`
`’509 Patent
`
`’509 patent, Ex. 1001
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`’509 Patent
`
`’509 patent, Ex. 1001
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01494, -01539 Claims 1-3, 7, 14, And 15 Instituted
`
`’509 patent, claims 1-3, 7, 14, 15, Ex. 1001
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01494, -01539 U.S. Patent No. 7,683,509
`
`Claims 1, 2, 7, 14, and 15 Are Unpatentable Over:
`
`• Bramm and Watterson
`• Stephan
`• Stephan, Raible, and Neal ’554
`• Umeda, Raible, and Neal ’554
`• Umeda and Stephan
`
`Claim 3 may also be unpatentable
`
`3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Two Interpretations Of Claim 3’s ‘Separate Conduit’
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Can be formed from the same material as the monolithic
`body as long as the conduit is mechanically or physically
`separate from the monolithic body along the flow path
`
`Not formed out of the monolithic body
`
`4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Claims 1, 2, 7, 14, And 15 Are
`Unpatentable Over Bramm And Watterson
`
`Body
`
`Stator Core
`Magnet
`
`Conductor
`
`Ex. 1008, Fig. 2
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 14-16, 44-51; Paper 30, 19-22; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 55-60, 163-194
`
`5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`IV Only Challenges Whether Bramm Is “Fluid-Cooled”
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 44; Paper 30, 19-22; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 164-165
`
`6
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`To The Extent That The Preambles Are Limiting,
`Bramm Discloses A Fluid-cooled Motor
`
`Body
`
`Stator Core
`
`Magnet
`
`Fluid Flow
`
`Fluid Flow
`
`Fluid Flow
`
`Conductor
`
`Ex. 1008, Figs. 1, 2
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 44; Paper 30, 19-22; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 164-165
`
`7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`To The Extent That The Preambles Are Limiting,
`Bramm Discloses A Fluid-cooled Motor
`
`Ex. 1008, 2:62-66
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 44; Paper 30, 19-22; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 164-165
`
`8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Claims 1, 2, 14, And 15 Are Unpatentable Over Stephan
`Alone And Over Stephan, Raible, And Neal ’554
`
`Inlet
`
`Coil/Core
`
`First
`Housing Half
`
`Rotor
`
`Second
`Housing Half
`
`IPR2017-01494, Paper 3, 16-50; Paper 24, 7-19; Ex. 1114, ¶¶ 48-129
`
`9
`
`Outlet
`
`Ex. 1102, Fig. 1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`IV Only Challenges Whether Stephan Has A “Fluid Pathway”
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Interpretation Of The
`Construction Of “Pathway” Is Too Narrow
`
`IPR2017-01494, Paper 24, 7-11
`
`Ex. 1139, 32, 33
`
`11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Stephan’s Pathway Similar To The “Pathway” Or Structural
`“Channel” Of The “Pump Embodiment” Described In The ’509 Patent
`
`Monolithic Body
`
`Copper Windings
`
`Coil/Stator
`
`Rotor
`
`Fluid Pathway
`
`Impeller
`
`Second
`Housing Half
`
`Annular Fluid Pathway
`
`First
`Housing Half
`
`Annotated Fig. 1 of
`the ’737 Patent
`
`Annotated Fig. 2 of
`Stephan (Ex. 1102)
`
`IPR2017-01494, Paper 3, 16-20, 29-32, 43-46; Paper 24, 11-19
`
`12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Stephan’s Pathway Similar To The “Pathway” Or Structural
`“Channel” Of The “Pump Embodiment” Described In The ’509 Patent
`
`Fluid Pathway
`
`Annular Fluid Pathway
`
`Annotated Fig. 1 of
`the ’737 Patent
`
`Annotated Fig. 2 of
`Stephan (Ex. 1102)
`
`IPR2017-01494, Paper 3, 16-20, 29-32, 43-46; Paper 24, 11-19
`
`13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Claims 1, 2, 7, 14, And 15 Are
`Unpatentable Over Umeda, Raible, And Neal
`
`Casing Cover
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Body
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 10-13, 20-33; Paper 30, 4-18; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 49-54, 64-113
`
`14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`IV Challenges That Umeda In View Of Raible And Neal ’554
`Discloses Particular Limitations In Claims 1, 2, 7, 14, And 15
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda’s Pathway Is “In The Monolithic Body”
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 25-29; Paper 30, 4-7; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 82-93
`
`16
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda’s Fluid Pathway Is In The “Monolithic Body”
`
`Monolithic
`Body
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 25-29; Paper 30, 4-7; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 82-93
`
`17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda, As Modified, Discloses “A Monolithic
`Body Of Injection Molded Thermoplastic Material”
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 20-25; Paper 30, 7-12; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 69-81
`
`18
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Neal ’554 Discloses The Benefits Of
`Using Injection Molded Thermoplastic
`
`Resin
`
`Thermoplastics
`
`Neal ’554 teaches that
`thermoplastic is preferable
`
`Ex. 1104, 5:40-44
`
`Ex. 1014, 6:26-34
`
`IPR2017-01539, Ex. 1014, 1:62-2:2, 4:67-5:22, 5:27-49, 6:26-59, 7:43-57, 8:8-24, 9:5-20, 10:27-61,
`14:27-30, 17:53-58, 18:4-10, 21:24-46; Paper 1, 20-25; Paper 30, 7-12; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 69-81
`
`19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Neal ’554 Discloses The Benefits Of
`Using Injection Molded Thermoplastic
`
`Molding
`
`Dr. Garris Deposition
`
`Injection Molding
`
`molding
`injection
`Q. Does
`benefits over cast molding?
`
`have
`
`any
`
`Neal ’554 teaches that injection
`molding is preferable
`
`A. Well, for certain applications, it
`certainly does, absolutely.
`
`describe
`you
`Q. Could
`benefits may be?
`
`what
`
`those
`
`A. Well, I think the – you know, the –
`largest benefit of injection molding
`is
`that
`it’s
`a
`high-production
`process…
`
`Ex. 1016, 33:7-15
`
`Dr. Trumper and Dr. Garris agree that injection molding
`provides cost benefits for high production processes
`
`Ex. 2017, 38:13-39:3; Ex. 1016, 33:11-34:6
`
`IPR2017-01539, Ex. 1014, 1:62-2:2, 4:67-5:22, 5:27-49, 6:26-59, 7:43-57, 8:8-24, 9:5-20, 10:27-61,
`14:27-30, 17:53-58, 18:4-10, 21:24-46; Paper 1, 20-25; Paper 30, 7-12; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 69-81
`
`20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`It Would Have Been Obvious To Use Injection
`Molded Thermoplastic In View Of Neal ’554
`
`Monolithic
`Body
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`Umeda, Fig. 1
`
`IPR2017-01539, Ex. 1014, 1:62-2:2, 4:67-5:22, 5:27-49, 6:26-59, 7:43-57, 8:8-24, 9:5-20, 10:27-61,
`14:27-30, 17:53-58, 18:4-10, 21:24-46; Paper 1, 20-25; Paper 30, 7-12; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 69-81
`
`21
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Alleged “Thick” Portions Do Not Prevent Forming Umeda’s
`Body A From Injection Molded Thermoplastic
`
`Regions of
`thick resin
`
`Windings
`
`Heat Sink Inserts
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`IV’s Annotated Fig. 1 of
`Umeda (Ex. 1004)
`
`Regions of thick
`thermoplastic
`
`Monolithic Body
`
`Core
`
`Annotated Fig. 7 of
`Neal ’554 (Ex. 1014)
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 30, 8-12
`
`22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Alleged “Thick” Portions Do Not Prevent Forming Umeda’s
`Body A From Injection Molded Thermoplastic
`
`Regions of
`thick resin
`
`Windings
`
`Heat Pipe Inserts
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`IV’s Annotated Fig. 1 of
`Umeda (Ex. 1004)
`
`Regions of thick
`thermoplastic
`
`Monolithic Body
`
`Core
`
`Annotated Fig. 7 of the
`’509 Patent (Ex. 1001)
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 30, 8-12
`
`23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda Discloses “Substantially
`Encapsulating The At Least One Conductor”
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 20-25; Paper 30, 12-13; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 69-81
`
`24
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda’s Conductors Are Substantially Encapsulated
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Body
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 16
`
`Monolithic Body
`
`Body
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 20-25; Paper 30, 12-13; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 69-81
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1
`
`25
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda’s Monolithic Body Completely Covers The Exterior Of The Device
`Except For The At Least One Fluid Inlet And The At Least One Fluid Outlet
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 29; Paper 30, 14-18; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 94-95
`
`26
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1, Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Umeda’s Monolithic Body Completely Covers The Exterior Of The Device
`Except For The At Least One Fluid Inlet And The At Least One Fluid Outlet
`
`Monolithic
`Body
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1
`
`IPR2017-01539, Paper 1, 29; Paper 30, 14-18; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 94-95
`
`27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`IV Challenges That Umeda In View Of Stephan Discloses
`Particular Limitations In Claims 1, 2, 7, 14, And 15
`
`’509 Patent, Claim 1
`
`28
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`It Would Have Been Obvious To Use Injection
`Molded Thermoplastic In View Of Stephan
`
`Resins
`
`Thermoplastics
`
`Similar to Neal ’554, Stephan teaches using
`injection molded thermoplastics is preferred
`to encapsulate conductors in motors
`
`IPR2017-01539, Ex. 1011, [0008], [0039], [0041]; Paper 1, 34-37; Paper 30, 22-24; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 119-132
`
`29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
`
`Claims 1, 2, 7, 14, And 15 Are
`Unpatentable Over Umeda And Stephan
`
`Resins
`
`Thermoplastics
`
`Stephan teaches using injection
`molded thermoplastics to
`encapsulate conductors
`
`Monolithic
`Body
`
`Stator Core
`
`Conductor
`
`Magnet
`
`Rotor Core
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1
`
`IPR2017-01539, Ex. 1011, [0008], [0039], [0041]; Paper 1, 34-37; Paper 30, 22-24; Ex. 1002, ¶¶ 119-132
`
`30
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Toyota/Aisin Ex. 1146
`IPR2017-01494 & IPR2017-01539
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
