`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper: 60
`
`
`Entered: July 26, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01569
`Patent 8,220,543 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before HYUN J. JUNG, JEREMY M. PLENZLER, and
`JAMES J. MAYBERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Expunge
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56
`Dismissing Motions to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01569
`Patent 8,220,543 B2
`
`
`
`I. MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`On June 13, 2018, we granted a Joint Motion to Terminate. Paper 58.
`With our prior authorization, the parties subsequently filed a Joint Motion to
`Expunge the Documents under Seal. Paper 59 (“Mot.”). Specifically, the
`parties move to expunge Papers 7, 8, 9, 11, 18, 19, 20, 27, 29, 33, 40, 41, 47,
`48, 52, and 53,1 as well as Exhibits 1101, 1103, 1104, 1107, 2005, 2009,
`2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56. Mot. 2. For the
`reasons set forth below, we grant the Joint Motion to Expunge.
`Because sealed information ordinarily becomes publicly available
`after denial of a petition to institute a trial or after final judgment in a trial, a
`party wishing to preserve its confidentiality may file a motion to expunge
`the information from the record. Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`Reg. 48756, 48761 (Aug. 14, 2012); 37 C.F.R. § 42.56. However, a strong
`public policy exists for making information filed in an inter partes review
`publicly available. 37 C.F.R. § 42.14; see also 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760–61.
`The public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file
`history is balanced with the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`information. 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760.
`We did not rely on the alleged confidential information in the Papers
`and Exhibits noted above in rendering the Institution Decision, the Decision
`
`1 Paper 18 is the unredacted, confidential version of the Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response, Paper 41 is the unredacted, confidential version of
`the Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing, and Paper 48 is the unredacted,
`confidential version of the Patent Owner’s Response. Paper 53 is the
`unredacted, confidential version of the Joint Motion to Terminate. The other
`unredacted, confidential Papers noted are Motions to Seal, a Motion for
`Extension of Time, and an Opposition to that Motion for Extension of Time.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01569
`Patent 8,220,543 B2
`
`
`Denying Rehearing, or the Decision Granting the Joint Motion to Terminate.
`Papers 38, 44, 58. The redacted public versions of Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response (Paper 22), Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing
`(Paper 43), Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 51), and the Joint Motion to
`Terminate (Paper 53) provide sufficient information for the public to
`understand the procedural posture and record of this proceeding. For the
`reasons discussed below, we dismiss the motions to seal (Papers 7, 11, 20,
`33, 40, 47, 52) as moot. In addition, we agree with the parties’ reasons for
`asserting that expunging these papers and exhibits is appropriate. See Mot.
`4–11. Thus, we find the public’s interest in being able to access this
`information does not outweigh the parties’ need to protect their confidential
`information.
`Accordingly, we grant the parties’ request to expunge Papers 7, 8, 9,
`11, 18, 19, 20, 27, 29, 33, 40, 41, 47, 48, 52, and 53, and Exhibits 1101,
`1103, 1104, 1107, 2005, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014.
`
`
`II. MOTIONS TO SEAL
`Patent Owner filed Motions to Seal, requesting to seal the Papers and
`Exhibits noted above in connection with the Joint Motion to Expunge.
`Papers 7, 11, 20, 33, 40, 47, 52.2 Because we have granted the parties’
`request to expunge the Papers and Exhibits that were the subject of those
`Motions to Seal, those Motions to Seal are dismissed as moot.
`
`
`
`2 Papers 7, 11, 20, 33, 40, 47, and 52 are the confidential versions of those
`Motions to Seal.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01569
`Patent 8,220,543 B2
`
`
`
`III. ORDER
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Expunge is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Papers 7, 8, 9, 11, 18, 19, 20, 27, 29, 33,
`40, 41, 47, 48, 52, and 53, and Exhibits 1101, 1103, 1104, 1107, 2005, 2009,
`2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 are expunged from the record; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal are
`dismissed as moot.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01569
`Patent 8,220,543 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Henry A. Petri
`James P. Murphy
`POLSINELLI PC
`hpetri@polsinelli.com
`jpmurphy@polsinelli.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`Christopher Ricciuti
`Katherine Cappaert
`Marc K. Weinstein
`OBLON, MCCLELLAN, MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP
`CPDocketKiklis@oblon.com
`CPDocketRicciuti@oblon.com
`CPDocketCappaert@oblon.com
`CPDocketWeinstein@oblon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`