throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper: 40
`
`
`Entered: July 26, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01577
`Patent 8,905,133 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before PATRICK R. SCANLON, HYUN J. JUNG, and
`JEREMY M. PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Expunge
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56
`Dismissing Motions to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01577
`Patent 8,905,133 B2
`
`
`
`I. MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`On June 13, 2018, we granted a Joint Motion to Terminate. Paper 38.
`With our prior authorization, the parties subsequently filed a Joint Motion to
`Expunge the Documents under Seal. Paper 39 (“Mot.”). Specifically, the
`parties move to expunge Papers 10, 11, 18, 19, 24, 25, 31, and 32,1 as well
`as Exhibits 2005, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, and 2013, pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.56. Mot. 2. For the reasons set forth below, we grant the Joint Motion
`to Expunge.
`Because sealed information ordinarily becomes publicly available
`after denial of a petition to institute a trial or after final judgment in a trial, a
`party wishing to preserve its confidentiality may file a motion to expunge
`the information from the record. Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`Reg. 48756, 48761 (Aug. 14, 2012); 37 C.F.R. § 42.56. However, a strong
`public policy exists for making information filed in an inter partes review
`publicly available. 37 C.F.R. § 42.14; see also 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760–61.
`The public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file
`history is balanced with the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`information. 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760.
`We did not rely on the alleged confidential information in the Papers
`and Exhibits noted above in rendering the Institution Decision, the Decision
`
`
`1 Paper 11 is the unredacted, confidential version of the Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response, Paper 19 is the unredacted, confidential version of
`the Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing, and Paper 25 is the unredacted,
`confidential version of the Patent Owner’s Response. Paper 32 is the
`unredacted, confidential version of the Joint Motion to Terminate. The other
`unredacted, confidential Papers noted are Motions to Seal.
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01577
`Patent 8,905,133 B2
`
`
`Denying Rehearing, or the Decision Granting the Joint Motion to Terminate.
`Papers 16, 22, 38. The redacted public versions of Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response (Paper 13), Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing
`(Paper 21), Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 28), and the Joint Motion to
`Terminate (Paper 35) provide sufficient information for the public to
`understand the procedural posture and record of this proceeding. For the
`reasons discussed below, we dismiss the motions to seal (Papers 10, 18, 24,
`31) as moot. In addition, we agree with the parties’ reasons for asserting
`that expunging these papers and exhibits is appropriate. See Mot. 3–8.
`Thus, we find the public’s interest in being able to access this information
`does not outweigh the parties’ need to protect their confidential information.
`Accordingly, we grant the parties’ request to expunge Papers 10, 11,
`18, 19, 24, 25, 31, and 32, and Exhibits 2005, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, and
`2013.
`
`
`
`II. MOTIONS TO SEAL
`Patent Owner filed Motions to Seal, requesting to seal the Papers and
`Exhibits noted above in connection with the Joint Motion to Expunge.
`Papers 10, 18, 24, 31.2 Because we have granted the parties’ request to
`expunge the Papers and Exhibits that were the subject of those Motions to
`Seal, those Motions to Seal are dismissed as moot.
`
`
`
`2 Papers 10, 18, 24, and 31 are the confidential versions of those Motions to
`Seal.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01577
`Patent 8,905,133 B2
`
`
`
`III. ORDER
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Expunge is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Papers 10, 11, 18, 19, 24, 25, 31, and 32,
`and Exhibits 2005, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, and 2013 are expunged from the
`record; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal are
`dismissed as moot.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01577
`Patent 8,905,133 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Henry A. Petri
`James P. Murphy
`POLSINELLI PC
`hpetri@polsinelli.com
`jpmurphy@polsinelli.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`Christopher Ricciuti
`Katherine Cappaert
`Marc K. Weinstein
`OBLON, MCCLELLAN, MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP
`CPDocketKiklis@oblon.com
`CPDocketRicciuti@oblon.com
`CPDocketCappaert@oblon.com
`CPDocketWeinstein@oblon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket