throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper No. 9
`Entered: January 17, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01581
`Patent 8,151,082 B2
`____________
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, and
`CHRISTA P. ZADO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ZADO, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a)
`Granting Request to Treat Settlement Document
`as Confidential Business Information
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b); 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`
`
`On December 22, 2017, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), the parties
`filed a Joint Motion by Petitioner and Patent Owner to Terminate
`Proceeding. Paper 7, “Joint Motion.” Accompanying the Joint Motion, the
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01581
`Patent 8,121,082 B2
`
`parties filed what they assert is a true copy of a settlement agreement along
`with a Joint Request to treat the settlement agreement as confidential, to be
`kept separate from the patent file under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74. Paper 8, “Joint Request”; Ex. 21001. The filing of these papers was
`authorized in an email sent on December 22, 2017.
`The instant proceeding is still in the preliminary stages, as we have
`not yet entered a decision whether or not to institute an inter partes review.
`Under these circumstances, Petitioner has demonstrated that dismissal of its
`Petition is warranted, and we grant the parties’ Joint Motion and dismiss the
`Petition. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a) (authorizing the Board to dismiss a
`petition).
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion is granted and the Petition
`is dismissed;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request that the
`settlement agreement (Ex. 2100) be treated as business confidential
`information and kept separate from the patent file, under the provisions of
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the version of Exhibit 2100 filed on
`December 22, 2017 is expunged.
`
`
`1 The Joint Motion and Joint Request refer to Exhibit 1100; however, the
`exhibit was filed as Exhibit 2100. We refer to the Exhibit as 2100. Pursuant
`to our instructions provided in an email sent on December 28, 2017, the
`parties submitted a replacement version of Exhibit 2100 on December 28,
`2017. The version of Exhibit 2100 previously filed on December 22, 2017 is
`expunged per this Order.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01581
`Patent 8,121,082 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`W. Karl Renner
`Jeremy J. Monaldo
`Brian G. Strand
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`jjm@fr.com
`strand@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`S. Benjamin Pleune
`Christopher TL Douglas
`David S. Frist
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`ben.pleune@alston.com
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`david.frist@alston.com
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket