throbber
IPR2017-01588
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`__________________
`
`Case IPR2017-01588
`Patent No. 8,460,247
`
`__________________
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`BD 1041
`BD v. B. BRAUN
`IPR2017-01588
`
`

`

`
`
`I, William G. McElwain, declare as follows:
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01588
`McElwain Declaration
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I was admitted to the Massachusetts Bar in December of 1982, the
`
`District of Columbia Bar in March of 1986, and the Virginia Bar in
`
`October of 1989. I have been practicing law for 36 years. For more
`
`than 25 years, my practice has focused primarily on patent litigation.
`
`2. Over the course of my career, I have been counsel in dozens of patent
`
`litigations.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing in the Bars of Massachusetts, the
`
`District of Columbia, and Virginia and am admitted to practice before
`
`the U.S. District Courts for the District of Columbia, District of
`
`Maryland, and District of Massachusetts. I am also admitted to
`
`practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and
`
`the United States Supreme Court.
`
`4. My Massachusetts Bar membership number is 332510. My District of
`
`Columbia Bar membership number is 397553. My Virginia Bar
`
`membership number is 30732.
`
`5.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`

`

`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01588
`McElwain Declaration
`
`
`
`6.
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Patent Office Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials, as set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. Part 42.
`
`8.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`9.
`
`I have applied to appear pro hac vice in the following proceedings
`
`before the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the last three
`
`years: Coherus Biosciences Inc. v. AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd., Case
`
`IPR2016-00172; Coherus Biosciences Inc. v. AbbVie Biotechnology
`
`Ltd., Case IPR2016-00188; Coherus Biosciences Inc. v. AbbVie
`
`Biotechnology Ltd., Case IPR2016-00189; Boerhringer Ingelheim
`
`Int’l. GmbH v. AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd., Case IPR2016-00408; and
`
`Boerhringer Ingelheim Int’l. GmbH v. AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd.,
`
`Case IPR2016-00409.
`
`10. I am intimately familiar with the subject matter of U.S. Patent No.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`8,460,247, as I am counsel in the related district court litigation and
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01588
`McElwain Declaration
`
`
`
`appeal, B. Braun Melsungen AG v. Becton, Dickinson and Co., Civ.
`
`No. 1:16-cv-00411-RGA (D. Del.), and its appeal, B Braun Melsungen
`
`AG v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Appeal No. 2018-1497 (Fed.
`
`Cir.).
`
`11. In addition to this matter, I have represented Becton, Dickinson and
`
`Company or its affiliates in multiple patent and patent-related cases,
`
`including: B. Braun Melsungen AG v. Becton, Dickinson and Co., Civ.
`
`No. 1:16-cv-00411-RGA (D. Del.), and its appeal, B Braun Melsungen
`
`AG v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Appeal No. 2018-1497 (Fed.
`
`Cir.); Safety Syringes Inc v. Becton Dickinson, Civ. No. 3:01-cv-2031-
`
`J NLS (S.D. Cal.); MBO Laboratories. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.,
`
`Appeal Nos. 2011-1446 and 2008-1446 (Fed. Cir.); Becton Dickinson
`
`and Co. v. Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Civ. No. 1:02-cv-1694 (D.
`
`Del.), and its appeal Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare
`
`Group, Appeal No. 2009-1053 (Fed. Cir.); Retractable Technologies,
`
`Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and Co., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-00250 (E.D. Tex.),
`
`and its appeals, Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.,
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Appeal Nos. 2010-1402 and 2013-1567 (Fed. Cir.); Becton Dickinson
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01588
`McElwain Declaration
`
`
`
`and Co. v. Retractable Technologies, Inc., Civ. No. 5:07-cv-00137-
`
`ALM-CMC (E.D. Tex.); Vaillancourt v. Becton Dickinson & Co.,
`
`Appeal No. 2013-1408 (Fed. Cir.); Enzo Life Sciences Inc., v. Becton
`
`Dickinson and Co., Civ. No. 1:12-cv-00275 (D. Del.); Becton
`
`Dickinson Diagnostics Inc.; and Geneohm Sciences, Inc., Civ. No.
`
`1:12-cv-00275-LPS (D. Del.); One Stockduq Holdings, LLC v. Becton,
`
`Dickinson and Company, Civ No. 2:12-cv-03037 (W.D. Tenn.), and
`
`its appeal, One Stockduq Holdings, LLC v. Becton, Dickinson and
`
`Company, Appeal No. 15-1255 (Fed. Cir.); Antares Pharma, Inc., v.
`
`Medac Pharma, Inc. and Medac GMBH, Civ. No. 1:14-cv-00270-SLR
`
`(D. Del.).
`
`12. I am familiar with IV catheter technology as a result of my
`
`participation as counsel in prior cases related to that technology,
`
`including One Stockduq Holdings, LLC v. Becton, Dickinson and
`
`Company, Civ No. 2:12-cv-03037 (W.D. Tenn.), and its appeals, One
`
`Stockduq Holdings, LLC v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Appeal
`
`No. 15-1255 (Fed. Cir.); and Vaillancourt v. Becton Dickinson & Co.,
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Appeal No. 2013-1408 (Fed. Cir.). I am also familiar with related
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01588
`McElwain Declaration
`
`
`
`medical device technology, such as syringes, as a result of my
`
`participation as counsel in prior cases related to that technology,
`
`including Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Becton Dickinson
`
`and Co., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-250 (E.D. Tex.), and its appeals,
`
`Retractable Tech., Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., Appeal Nos.
`
`2010-1402 and 2013-1567 (Fed. Cir.). In addition, I have represented
`
`a number of life sciences and medical devices companies—Becton,
`
`Dickinson and Company, AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd., F. Hoffman-
`
`LaRoche Ltd., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others—in many patent
`
`litigation matters before federal district courts, appellate courts, and
`
`arbitration tribunals. The technology involved in these disputes
`
`includes, e.g., IV catheters, syringes, pharmaceuticals compounds, and
`
`nucleic acid detection and hybridization.
`
`13. I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge
`
`are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements and the like are punishable by
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`fine, imprisonment, or both under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01588
`McElwain Declaration
`
`
`
`United States Code.
`
`
`Dated: May 2, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted
`
`/William G. McElwain/
`William G. McElwain
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`DORR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`(202) 663-6388
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket