`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 35
`Entered: October 1, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC.,
`HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS (Thailand) CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NITTO DENKO CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01607
`Patent 8,692,126
`
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Decision on Motion
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner has filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of Ronald F.
`Lopez in this proceeding. Paper 34. The motion is supported by a
`declaration of Mr. Lopez. Paper 34, 4 (“Exhibit A”). Patent Owner did not
`file an opposition within the one week period.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01607
`Patent 8,692,126
`
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Lopez pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for admission of Ronald F. Lopez
`pro hac vice is granted.
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jennifer Hayes
`jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Dan Burnham
`dburnham@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Matthew Werber
`mwerber@nixonpeabody.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Alex Chachkes
`a34ptabdocket@orrick.com
`
`Donald Daybell
`d2dptabdocket@orrick.com
`
`K. Patrick Herman
`P52PTABDocket@orrick.com
`
`
`
`2
`
`