Case 1:15-cv-00262-SLR-SRF Document 75 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1678
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 15-262 (SLR) (SRF)
`
`)))))))))
`
`IMPROVED SEARCH LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AOL INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Improved Search LLC (“Improved Search”) and Defendant AOL Inc. (“AOL”)
`
`submit the following Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement, updating the Joint Claim
`
`Construction Statement submitted on October 4, 2016 [D.I. 51] to reflect the terms on which the
`
`parties have reached agreement, and the terms over which there remains a dispute.
`
`a.
`
`The Construction of Terms on Which the Parties Agree
`
`The parties have agreed upon the constructions of the following terms of the asserted
`
`claims:
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`receiving through an input device,
`a query /receiving from the user
`through an input device a query
`(’101 Patent, Claim 1; ’154 Patent
`Claim 1)
`
`first language
`(’101 Patent Claims 1, 2, 4, 25, 27,
`28; ’154 Patent, Claims 1, 7)
`
`3. content word
`(’101 Patent, Claim 1; ’154 Patent,
`Claims 1, 7)
`
`receiving on a user’s computer a query
`from an input device connected to that
`computer
`
`language in which the query is entered
`by a user
`
`a word other than a preposition, article,
`or pronoun
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1006, p.1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 15-262 (SLR) (SRF)
`
`)))))))))
`
`IMPROVED SEARCH LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AOL INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Improved Search LLC (“Improved Search”) and Defendant AOL Inc. (“AOL”)
`
`submit the following Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement, updating the Joint Claim
`
`Construction Statement submitted on October 4, 2016 [D.I. 51] to reflect the terms on which the
`
`parties have reached agreement, and the terms over which there remains a dispute.
`
`a.
`
`The Construction of Terms on Which the Parties Agree
`
`The parties have agreed upon the constructions of the following terms of the asserted
`
`claims:
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`receiving through an input device,
`a query /receiving from the user
`through an input device a query
`(’101 Patent, Claim 1; ’154 Patent
`Claim 1)
`
`first language
`(’101 Patent Claims 1, 2, 4, 25, 27,
`28; ’154 Patent, Claims 1, 7)
`
`3. content word
`(’101 Patent, Claim 1; ’154 Patent,
`Claims 1, 7)
`
`receiving on a user’s computer a query
`from an input device connected to that
`computer
`
`language in which the query is entered
`by a user
`
`a word other than a preposition, article,
`or pronoun
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1006, p.1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00262-SLR-SRF Document 75 Filed 01/26/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1679
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`4. search in the second
`language/searching in the second
`language
`(’101 Patent, Claim 1; ’154 Patent,
`Claims 1, 7)
`
`5. advertising cues
`(’154 Patent, Claims 1, 7)
`
`6. “means to send the search results
`and the matching advertising cues
`to the user’s computer screen”
`(’154 Patent, Claim 7)
`
`searching using only words in the
`second language including words from
`other languages that are used in the
`second language
`
`advertisements, as well as signals or
`references that direct a user to an
`advertisement
`
`Means Plus Function
`Function: to send the search results and
`the matching advertising cues to the
`user’s computer screen
`Structure: server and/or browser or
`equivalents
`
`
`
`
`
`b.
`
`Proposed Constructions of Disputed Terms
`
`The Parties’ proposed constructions of disputed terms are provided in the chart below.
`
`Claim Term, Phrase or
`Clause
`
`Improved Search’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`AOL’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`1. Translating
`(’101 Patent, Claims 1,
`25; ’154 Patent, Claims
`1, 7)
`
`2. second language
`(’101 Patent, Claims 1,
`5, 24, 27, 28; ’154
`Patent, Claims 1, 7)
`
`3. contextual search /
`contextually searching
`(‘101 Patent, Claims 1,
`24, 25; ’154 Patent
`Claims 1, 7)
`
`changing text from one
`language into an equivalent
`text in a different language
`
`language different from the
`first language, including
`different dialects of the first
`language
`
`identification of/identifying
`relevant documents from the
`domain-unlimited set of
`documents available on the
`World Wide Web, based on
`words contained in the
`documents.
`
`changing text from one
`language into an equivalent
`text in a different language
`pre-selected by the user
`
`language different from the
`first language
`
`identification of relevant
`documents based on words
`contained in those documents
`
`2
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1006, p.2
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00262-SLR-SRF Document 75 Filed 01/26/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1680
`
`Claim Term, Phrase or
`Clause
`
`Improved Search’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`AOL’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`4. dialectal
`standardization /
`dialectally
`standardizing /
`dialectally standardized
`(’101 Patent, Claim 1;
`’154 Patent, Claims 1,
`7)
`
`5. means for receiving
`from the user through
`an input device a query
`in the first language
`(’154 Patent, Claim 7)
`
`6. dialectal controller for
`dialectally
`standardizing a content
`word extracted from the
`query
`(’154 Patent, Claim 7)
`
`7. means to search the
`database of the
`advertising cues based
`on the relevancy to the
`translated content word
`(’154 Patent, Claim 7)
`
`to map keywords from
`different styles and dialects
`into standard and less
`ambiguous keywords
`
`changing a word to a more
`standard and less ambiguous
`word in a different dialect of
`the same language, if such a
`word is identified
`
`Means Plus Function:
`Indefinite (no disclosed
`structure)
`
`Means Plus Function:
`Indefinite (no disclosed
`structure)
`
`Means Plus Function:
`Indefinite (no disclosed
`structure)
`
`Means Plus Function:
`Function: receiving from the
`user through an input device a
`query in a first language
`Structure: Keyboard or
`equivalents
`
`This term is not governed by
`35 U.S.C. § 112(6). If it is
`ruled to be so governed,
`Improved Search submits that
`the following structures
`provide the function of
`“dialectally standardizing a
`content word extracted from
`the query”:
`Server or equivalents
`
`Means Plus Function:
`Function: to search the
`database of the advertising
`cues based on the relevancy to
`the translated content word
`Structure: Server or
`equivalents
`
`3
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1006, p.3
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00262-SLR-SRF Document 75 Filed 01/26/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1681
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`/s/Michael J. Farnan
`
`
`
`
`Brian E. Farnan (#4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (#5165)
`919 North Market Street
`12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 777-0300
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Robert Yorio
`CARR & FERRELL LLP
`120 Constitution Drive
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 812-3400
`
`January 26, 2017
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld
`
`
`
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Kevin Hardy
`Samuel Bryant Davidoff
`Melissa B. Collins
`Sanjiv P. Laud
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 434-5000
`
`4
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1006, p.4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
