throbber
Paper 27
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: September 6, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01619
`Case IPR2017-01620
` (Patent 8,489,868 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`AARON W. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses an issue that is identical in both cases. We exercise
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in both cases. The parties, however,
`are not authorized to use this style heading.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01619; IPR2017-01620
`(Patent 8,489,868 B2)
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner each requested a hearing in the above
`
`proceedings pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). See Papers 23, 24. The
`
`requests are granted.
`
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on
`
`September 17, 2018, and will be conducted at the USPTO Headquarters,
`
`Madison Building East, Ninth Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`
`Virginia, 22314. The hearing will be open to the public for in-person
`
`attendance that will be accommodated on a first come, first serve basis.
`
`Notwithstanding Patent Owner’s request to have separate hearings in
`
`which each party is permitted an hour per hearing of argument time, we
`
`determine that the issues in the two cases overlap significantly and that a
`
`single hearing would be the most appropriate way to address all issues and
`
`avoid duplicative arguments and inefficiencies. Accordingly, we shall hold
`
`a single hearing where each party will have ninety (90) minutes of total time
`
`to present arguments.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the challenged
`
`claims are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will proceed first to present
`
`its case as to the challenged claims, and may reserve rebuttal time. Patent
`
`Owner then will respond to Petitioner’s presentation. Petitioner then may
`
`use the rest of its time to respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all
`
`matters.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at
`
`least seven business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed with the
`
`Board no later than five business days prior to the hearing date. The parties
`
`must initiate a conference call with the Board at least three business days
`
`prior to the hearing to resolve any dispute over the propriety of each party’s
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01619; IPR2017-01620
`(Patent 8,489,868 B2)
`
`demonstrative exhibits. The parties are directed to St. Jude Med.,
`
`Cardiology Div., Inc. v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Mich., Case
`
`IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), regarding the appropriate
`
`content of demonstrative exhibits. See also CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich
`
`Patent Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper
`
`118) (explaining that the Board has the discretion to limit the parties’
`
`demonstratives to pages in the record should there be no easy resolution to
`
`objections over demonstratives).
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the
`
`hearing, although any back-up counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for any party will not be in attendance at
`
`the hearing, the Board should be notified via a joint conference call no later
`
`than two days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`
`hearing transcript will be entered in the record of this proceeding.
`
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearing are to be made
`
`five days in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. If the requests are not received timely, equipment may
`
`not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01619; IPR2017-01620
`(Patent 8,489,868 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph E. Palys
`Phillip Citroën
`John Holley
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`phillipcitroen@paulhastings.com
`johnholley@paulhastings.com
`PH-Google-BBIPR@paulhastings.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Ching-Lee Fukuda
`Samuel A. Dillon
`Sharon Lee
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`clfukuda@sidley.com
`samuel.dillon@sidley.com
`sharon.lee@sidley.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket