throbber
Paper: 22 ___
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Entered: September 13, 2018
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SATCO PRODUCTS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2017-01638 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01639 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, PATRICK M. BOUCHER, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearings
`35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner each request oral hearings pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). See IPR2017-01638, Papers 21, 22; IPR2017-01639,
`Papers 20, 21. The requests are granted.
`In accordance with the parties’ requests, each side will have
`30 minutes to present its arguments in each case. Petitioner bears the
`ultimate burden of proof that the challenged claims are unpatentable. See
`35 U.S.C. § 316(e). At each hearing, Petitioner will proceed first to present
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01638 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)
`IPR2017-01639 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`
`its case as to the challenged claims and may reserve rebuttal time. Patent
`Owner then will respond to Petitioner’s case and may reserve a brief sur-
`rebuttal time. After that, Petitioner may use the rest of its time to respond to
`Patent Owner’s presentation, and Patent Owner may use the rest of its time
`to respond to Petitioner’s rebuttal presentation.
`The hearings will begin at 1:00 pm ET on Wednesday,
`September 19, 2018, starting with IPR2017-01638 and then moving to
`IPR2017-01639. The hearings will be open to the public for in-person
`attendance on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany
`Street, Alexandria, Virginia. One or more judges of the panel may attend
`remotely. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
`served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearings, and
`the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearings. If
`the parties have any concern about disclosing confidential information, they
`are to contact the Board at least three days before the hearings to discuss the
`matter.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at
`least three business days prior to the hearings. The parties shall meet and
`confer regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits, and the parties
`shall file demonstrative exhibits with the Board at least two business days
`prior to the hearings. If any issues regarding demonstratives remain
`unresolved after the parties meet and confer, the parties shall file jointly a
`one-page list of objections at least two business days prior to the hearings.
`The list should identify with particularity which demonstrative exhibits are
`subject to objection and include a short statement (no more than one
`sentence) of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01638 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)
`IPR2017-01639 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`
`explanation is permitted. We will consider the objections and schedule a
`conference call if necessary. Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the
`objections until the hearings or after the hearings. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be considered
`waived. Each party also shall provide a hard copy of its demonstrative
`exhibits to the court reporter at the hearing.
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division,
`Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, No. IPR2013-
`00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), regarding the appropriate content
`of demonstrative exhibits. The parties are reminded that the presenter must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) referenced during the hearings to ensure the clarity and
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner to be
`present at the hearings, though any back-up counsel may make the actual
`presentation, in whole or in part. If lead counsel for any party will not be in
`attendance at the hearings, the Board should be notified via a joint
`conference call no later than two days prior to the hearings to discuss the
`matter.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearing are to be made two
`days in advance of the date of the hearings. The requests must be sent to
`Trials@uspto.gov. If the requests are not received timely, equipment may
`not be available on the day of the hearings.
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01638 (Patent 8,201,968 B2)
`IPR2017-01639 (Patent 8,967,844 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Timothy M. Nitsch
`Robert S. Rigg
`tnitsch@vedderprice.com
`rrigg@vedderprice.com
`VEDDER PRICE P.C.
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Garret Leach
`Garret.leach@kirkland.com
`
`Eric Hayes
`Eric.hayes@kirkland.com
`
`Eugene Goryunov
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`
`Kyle Kantarek
`Kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket