throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 14
`Entered: November 21, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RAVIN CROSSBOWS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PRECISION SHOOTING EQUIPMENT, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01640
`Patent 8,240,299 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before BARRY L. GROSSMAN, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and
`SCOTT C. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`Granting Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement
`as Business Confidential Information
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b); 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`Granting Joint Motion to Expunge
`37 C.F.R. § 42.7(a)
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01640
`Patent 8,240,299 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to our e-mail authorizations on October 13, 2017,
`
`November 7, 2017, and November 20, 2017, Petitioner, Ravin Crossbows,
`
`LLC, and Patent Owner, Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc., filed a
`
`corrected Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding (Paper 10, “Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate”) and a Joint Motion to File Settlement Agreement as
`
`Confidential Business Information (Paper 13, “Joint Motion re Business
`
`Confidential”). Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the parties also filed what
`
`they represent is a true copy of their written settlement agreement (Paper 11,
`
`“Settlement Agreement”). The Settlement Agreement is also referred to as
`
`“Exhibit R1019.” See Joint Motion to Terminate, 4–5. There is no
`
`Exhibit R1019 in the record of this proceeding. Accordingly, we refer to
`
`Paper 11 as the Settlement Agreement. The Parties also filed a Joint Motion
`
`to Expunge the originally filed documents (Papers 7, 8, and 9), which refer
`
`in error to a related proceeding.
`
`In this proceeding, a Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,240,299 B2 (“the ’299 patent”) was filed on June 19, 2017 (“the
`
`Petition”). See Papers 1, 5. We have not rendered a decision on institution
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`In the Joint Motion to Terminate, the parties indicate that they have
`
`reached an agreement regarding all of their disputes involving
`
`the ’299 patent. Joint Motion to Terminate, 3–5. The parties’ settlement
`
`includes dismissing a related district court proceeding between the parties
`
`involving the ’299 patent. Id. at 2–3. The parties certify that the Settlement
`
`Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the
`
`parties, and that there are no other collateral agreements or understandings
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01640
`Patent 8,240,299 B2
`
`made in connection with, or in contemplation of, terminating this inter
`
`partes review. Id. at 4–5.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” The
`
`parties indicate that termination as to both parties is appropriate here. As the
`
`parties note, we have not rendered a Final Written Decision on the merits.
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, 4. Furthermore, we have not issued a decision
`
`on institution in this proceeding. In view of the circumstances presented in
`
`this proceeding, we agree that termination is appropriate. Indeed, there are
`
`strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between the parties to a
`
`proceeding. Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756,
`
`48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Accordingly, we determine that it is appropriate to
`
`terminate this proceeding without rendering a final written decision. See 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Expunge Paper Nos. 7, 8 and 9
`
`(Paper 12) is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion (Paper 13) that the
`
`Settlement Agreement (Paper 11) be treated as business confidential
`
`information and kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 8,240,299 B2,
`
`under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is
`
`granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`(Paper 10) is granted, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01640
`Patent 8,240,299 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Derek Vandenburgh
`dvandenburgh@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`Jonathan Carpenter
`jcarpenter@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`Iain McIntyre
`imcintyre@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Marvin Glazer
`mglazer@cvglaw.com
`
`William Cahill
`cahill@cvglaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket