`
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`QUANTUM STREAM INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`———————
`Case IPR2017-01672
`U.S. Patent No. 9,047,626
`_____________________
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceedings
`IPR2017-01672 (Patent 9,047,626)
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner Unified Patents Inc. (“Unified
`
`
`
`Patents”) and Patent Owner Quantum Stream Inc. (“Quantum Stream”)
`
`(collectively, the “Parties”) jointly request termination of the instant Inter Partes
`
`Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,047,626 (“the ’626 Patent”). The filing of this request
`
`was authorized by Maria Vignone, via e-mail dated July 12, 2018.
`
`The Parties have settled their dispute with respect to the ’626 Patent and
`
`have reached agreement to terminate this Inter Partes Review. The Settlement
`
`Agreement between Unified Patents and Quantum Stream has been made in
`
`writing, and a true and correct copy shall be filed with this Office as business
`
`confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). See Exhibit 1018. There
`
`are no collateral agreements or understandings made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of this proceeding.
`
`Therefore, Petitioner and Patent Owner respectfully request termination of
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2017-01672.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`July 13, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/David L. McCombs/
`David L. McCombs
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 32,271
`
`/Gregory S. Gewirtz/
`Gregory S. Gewirtz
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 36,522
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceedings
`IPR2017-01672 (Patent 9,047,626)
`PETITIONER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`EX1001 U.S. Patent 9,047,626 to Akadiri
`
`EX1002
`
`Prosecution File History of U.S. Patent 9,047,626 (“’626 PH”)
`
`EX1003
`
`EX1004
`
`Excerpts from Prosecution File History of U.S. Patent 8,315,949
`(“’949 PH”)
`Prosecution File History of U.S. Provisional Appl. 60/155,015
`
`EX1005 Declaration of Dr. Kevin C. Almeroth Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68
`
`EX1006 WO 97/19560 to Arazi et al.
`
`EX1007 WO 98/28906 to Rosser
`
`EX1008 US Patent 6,698,020 to Zigmond et al.
`
`EX1009 US Patent 5,887,133 to Brown et al.
`
`EX1010 US Patent 6,615,039 to Eldering
`
`EX1011
`
`Prosecution File History of U.S. Provisional Appl. 60/133,398
`
`EX1012 US Patent 6,820,277 to Eldering et al.
`
`EX1013
`
`Prosecution File History of U.S. Provisional Appl. 60/130,102
`
`EX1014
`
`Prosecution File History of U.S. Provisional Appl. 60/183,411
`
`EX1015 US Patent 6,487,538 to Gupta et al.
`
`EX1016 US Patent 6,324,519 to Eldering ’519
`
`v. Charter
`Inc.
`and Order, Quantum Stream
`EX1017 Opinion
`Communications, Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-01696 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1,
`2018)
`Settlement Agreement (Parties and Board Only)
`
`EX1018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2017-01672
`U.S. Patent No. 9,047,626
`
`
`§§§§§
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Unified Patents Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, that service
`was made on the Patent Owner as detailed below.
`Date of service July 13, 2018
`
`Manner of service Electronic Service by E-Mail
`
`Documents served Joint Motion to Terminate Proceedings
`Exhibit 1018
`
`Persons served Gregory Gewirtz (GGewirtz.ipr@ldlkm.com)
`Jonathan David (JDavid.ipr@ldlkm.com)
`
`
`
`/Raghav Bajaj/
`Raghav Bajaj
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 66,630
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
