throbber
Paper 24
`Entered: September 5, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571–272–7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SPTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PLASMA-THERM LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01674
`Patent 8,802,545 B2
`____________
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON, ELIZABETH M. ROESEL, and
`AMANDA F. WIEKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WIEKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Oral Argument
`35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01674
`Patent 8,802,545 B2
`
`
`On January 11, 2018, we instituted an inter partes review proceeding
`as to claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 8,802,545 B2. Paper 7. The
`Scheduling Order (Paper 8) for this proceeding provided that an oral hearing
`would be conducted if a hearing is requested by the parties and granted by
`the Board. Both parties request oral argument, pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.70(a). Papers 21, 23. The parties’ requests are granted.
`The hearing will commence at 10:00 AM Eastern Time on
`October 10, 2018, and will be open to the public for in-person attendance on
`the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
`served basis. We will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Petitioner requests forty-five (45) minutes of oral argument time.
`Paper 21. Patent Owner also requests forty-five (45) minutes of oral
`argument time. Paper 23. We have reviewed the issues that the parties
`intend to address in this proceeding and, consistent with the parties’
`requests, we determine that each party will be accorded forty-five (45)
`minutes of total argument time.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the challenged
`claims are unpatentable. 35 U.S.C. § 316(e). Petitioner, therefore, will open
`the hearing by presenting its case regarding the challenged claims and Patent
`Owner’s proposed substitute claims. After Petitioner’s presentation, Patent
`Owner may respond to Petitioner’s argument. Petitioner may reserve time
`for rebuttal, out of its allotted time, to respond to argument presented by
`Patent Owner. Patent Owner may also reserve time for sur-rebuttal, out of
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01674
`Patent 8,802,545 B2
`
`its allotted time, to respond to argument presented by Petitioner in its
`rebuttal.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits, if any, must
`be served no later than seven (7) business days before the hearing date.
`They shall be filed with the Board no later than five (5) business days before
`the hearing date. Demonstrative exhibits are merely a visual aid for use
`at the hearing and not evidence, and should be clearly marked as such.
`For example, each slide may be marked with the words
`“DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer.
`Demonstrative exhibits shall not introduce new arguments or evidence. The
`parties shall meet and confer to discuss any objections to demonstrative
`exhibits at least three (3) business days before the hearing. If any issues
`regarding demonstratives remain unresolved after the parties meet and
`confer, the parties shall file jointly a one-page list of objections to the
`demonstrative exhibits at least two (2) business days before the hearing. For
`each objection, the list must identify with particularity the demonstratives
`subject to the objection and include a short, one-sentence statement
`explaining the objection. We will consider the objections and schedule a
`conference call if necessary. For further guidance on what constitutes an
`appropriate demonstrative exhibit, the parties are directed to CBS Interactive
`Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct.
`23, 2013) (Paper 118).
`We take this opportunity to remind the parties that each presenter
`must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by
`slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity
`and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01674
`Patent 8,802,545 B2
`
`
`Requests for special accommodations or audio-visual equipment
`are to be made at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing
`date. Such requests must be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the requests are
`not received timely, requested accommodations and/or equipment may not
`be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Adam C. Volentine
`Josh Povsner
`Volentine, Whitt & Francos PLLC
`avolentine@volentine.com
`jpovsner@volentine.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Harvey S. Kauget
`Ryan M. Corbett
`Burr & Forman LLP
`hkauget@burr.com
`rcorbett@burr.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket